Literature DB >> 15758007

Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients.

Nils Kucher1, Sophia Koo, Rene Quiroz, Joshua M Cooper, Marilyn D Paterno, Boris Soukonnikov, Samuel Z Goldhaber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prophylaxis against deep-vein thrombosis in hospitalized patients remains underused. We hypothesized that the use of a computer-alert program to encourage prophylaxis might reduce the frequency of deep-vein thrombosis among high-risk hospitalized patients.
METHODS: We developed a computer program linked to the patient database to identify consecutive hospitalized patients at risk for deep-vein thrombosis in the absence of prophylaxis. The program used medical-record numbers to randomly assign 1255 eligible patients to an intervention group, in which the responsible physician was alerted to a patient's risk of deep-vein thrombosis, and 1251 patients to a control group, in which no alert was issued. The physician was required to acknowledge the alert and could then withhold or order prophylaxis, including graduated compression stockings, pneumatic compression boots, unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or warfarin. The primary end point was clinically diagnosed, objectively confirmed deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism at 90 days.
RESULTS: More patients in the intervention group than in the control group received mechanical prophylaxis (10.0 percent vs. 1.5 percent, P<0.001) or pharmacologic prophylaxis (23.6 percent vs. 13.0 percent, P<0.001). The primary end point occurred in 61 patients (4.9 percent) in the intervention group, as compared with 103 (8.2 percent) in the control group; the Kaplan-Meier estimates of the likelihood of freedom from deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism at 90 days were 94.1 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 92.5 to 95.4 percent) and 90.6 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 88.7 to 92.2 percent), respectively (P<0.001). The computer alert reduced the risk of deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism at 90 days by 41 percent (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.43 to 0.81; P=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The institution of a computer-alert program increased physicians' use of prophylaxis and markedly reduced the rates of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism among hospitalized patients at risk. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15758007     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa041533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  200 in total

Review 1.  Changing clinical practice through patient specific reminders available at the time of the clinical encounter: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tim A Holt; Margaret Thorogood; Frances Griffiths
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  ASCO Clinical Practice Guidelines and Beyond.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Preventing venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: can we do better?

Authors:  Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Benchmarking electronic medical records initiatives in the US: a conceptual model.

Authors:  Carlos Palacio; Jeffrey P Harrison; David Garets
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Impact of a student-supported pharmacy assessment program on venous thromboembolism prophylaxis rates in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Laura E Butkievich; Zachary A Stacy; Michael W Daly; Way Y Huey; Charles T Taylor
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Randomized clinical trial of a customized electronic alert requiring an affirmative response compared to a control group receiving a commercial passive CPOE alert: NSAID--warfarin co-prescribing as a test case.

Authors:  Brian L Strom; Rita Schinnar; Warren Bilker; Sean Hennessy; Charles E Leonard; Eric Pifer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Rationale supporting an "opt-out" policy for pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients.

Authors:  Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Frequency of thromboprophylaxis and incidence of in-hospital venous thromboembolism in a cohort of emergency department patients.

Authors:  Alan E Jones; Zachary Fordham; Vasilios Yiannibas; Charles L Johnson; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  National and Regional Trends in Deep Vein Thrombosis Hospitalization Rates, Discharge Disposition, and Outcomes for Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Karl E Minges; Behnood Bikdeli; Yun Wang; Robert R Attaran; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines in elderly patients with hospital acquired venous thromboembolism: a case control study.

Authors:  Jason Suh; Amishi Desai; Anish Desai; Josephine Dela Cruz; Anusiyanthan Mariampillai; Alexander Hindenburg
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.