Literature DB >> 22204723

Low-molecular-weight heparin and mortality in acutely ill medical patients.

Ajay K Kakkar1, Claudio Cimminiello, Samuel Z Goldhaber, Rajiv Parakh, Chen Wang, Jean-François Bergmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although thromboprophylaxis reduces the incidence of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients, an associated reduction in the rate of death from any cause has not been shown.
METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to assess the effect of subcutaneous enoxaparin (40 mg daily) as compared with placebo--both administered for 10±4 days in patients who were wearing elastic stockings with graduated compression--on the rate of death from any cause among hospitalized, acutely ill medical patients at participating sites in China, India, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, the Philippines, and Tunisia. Inclusion criteria were an age of at least 40 years and hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure, severe systemic infection with at least one risk factor for venous thromboembolism, or active cancer. The primary efficacy outcome was the rate of death from any cause at 30 days after randomization. The primary safety outcome was the rate of major bleeding during and up to 48 hours after the treatment period.
RESULTS: A total of 8307 patients were randomly assigned to receive enoxaparin plus elastic stockings with graduated compression (4171 patients) or placebo plus elastic stockings with graduated compression (4136 patients) and were included in the intention-to-treat population. The rate of death from any cause at day 30 was 4.9% in the enoxaparin group as compared with 4.8% in the placebo group (risk ratio, 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 1.2; P=0.83). The rate of major bleeding was 0.4% in the enoxaparin group and 0.3% in the placebo group (risk ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.7 to 3.1; P=0.35).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of enoxaparin plus elastic stockings with graduated compression, as compared with elastic stockings with graduated compression alone, was not associated with a reduction in the rate of death from any cause among hospitalized, acutely ill medical patients. (Funded by Sanofi; LIFENOX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00622648.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22204723     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  40 in total

Review 1.  Thrombosis and cancer.

Authors:  Annie Young; Oliver Chapman; Carole Connor; Christopher Poole; Peter Rose; Ajay K Kakkar
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Interventional trials with anticoagulants in acutely ill medical patients: a methodological pitfall?

Authors:  Francesco Violi; Ludovica Perri; Lorenzo Loffredo
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Canadian consensus recommendations on the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Part 1: prophylaxis.

Authors:  J C Easaw; M A Shea-Budgell; C M J Wu; P M Czaykowski; J Kassis; B Kuehl; H J Lim; M MacNeil; D Martinusen; P A McFarlane; E Meek; O Moodley; S Shivakumar; V Tagalakis; S Welch; P Kavan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in elderly patients with multimorbidity.

Authors:  Maura Marcucci; Alfonso Iorio; Alessandro Nobili; Mauro Tettamanti; Luca Pasina; Codjo Djignefa Djade; Alessandra Marengoni; Francesco Salerno; Salvatore Corrao; Pier Mannuccio Mannucci
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 5.  Management of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Prophylaxis in Trauma Patients.

Authors:  Shahram Paydar; Golnar Sabetian; Hosseinali Khalili; Javad Fallahi; Mohammad Tahami; Bizhan Ziaian; Hamid Reza Abbasi; Shahram Bolandparvaz; Fariborz Ghaffarpasand; Zahra Ghahramani
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2016-01

6.  Mind the gap: venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients hospitalized with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  John I Allen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines in elderly patients with hospital acquired venous thromboembolism: a case control study.

Authors:  Jason Suh; Amishi Desai; Anish Desai; Josephine Dela Cruz; Anusiyanthan Mariampillai; Alexander Hindenburg
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized medical patients.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Mary Cushman; Allison E Burnett; Susan R Kahn; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Frederick A Spencer; Suely M Rezende; Neil A Zakai; Kenneth A Bauer; Francesco Dentali; Jill Lansing; Sara Balduzzi; Andrea Darzi; Gian Paolo Morgano; Ignacio Neumann; Robby Nieuwlaat; Juan J Yepes-Nuñez; Yuan Zhang; Wojtek Wiercioch
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

9.  Evaluating the safety and effectiveness of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Denise Kelley; Lauren Thornton Jones; Jun Wu; Nicole Bohm
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 10.  Nadroparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in nonsurgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Walter Ageno; Jacqueline Bosch; Michel Cucherat; John W Eikelboom
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.