Literature DB >> 27749154

Portable Myoelectric Brace Use Increases Upper Extremity Recovery and Participation But Does Not Impact Kinematics in Chronic, Poststroke Hemiparesis.

Nienke W Willigenburg1,2, Michael P McNally3, Timothy E Hewett4,5, Stephen J Page6.   

Abstract

The authors examined the efficacy of an 8-week regimen combining repetitive task-specific practice (RTP) with a myoelectric brace (RTP+Myomo) on paretic upper extremity (UE; use in valued activities, perceived recovery, and reaching kinematics) in 12 subjects (4 men; M age = 53.5 years; mean time poststroke = 61.7 months). Seven subjects were administered RTP+Myomo therapy, and 5 were administered RTP only. Both groups participated in individualized, 45-min therapy sessions occurring 3 days/week over an 8-week period. The arm, hand ability, activities of daily living, and perceptions of recovery subscales of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS), as well as UE reaching kinematics, assessed before and after the intervention. Subjects in the RTP+Myomo group showed greater improvements on all SIS subscales, with the recovery scale reaching statistical significance (p = .03). Subjects in the RTP-only group showed a greater increase in hand velocity in the reach up task (p = .02), but no changes were observed in the range of shoulder flexion or elbow extension during reaching. None of the changes in kinematic outcome measures significantly correlated with any of the changes in SIS subscales. RTP integrating myoelectric bracing may be more beneficial than RTP only in improving self-reported function and perceptions of overall recovery. The authors observed no changes in the range of elbow extension, and no relationship between self-reported improvements and changes in reaching kinematics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hemiplegia; kinematics; neurorehabilitation; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27749154      PMCID: PMC5470353          DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2016.1152220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  26 in total

1.  Kinematic motion analysis and muscle activation patterns of continuous reaching in survivors of stroke.

Authors:  Crystal L Massie; Matthew P Malcolm; David P Greene; Raymond C Browning
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 2.  Plasticity.

Authors:  Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2006-10

3.  Gains in upper extremity function after stroke via recovery or compensation: Potential differential effects on amount of real-world limb use.

Authors:  Peter S Lum; Sara Mulroy; Richard L Amdur; Philip Requejo; Boris I Prilutsky; Alexander W Dromerick
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.119

Review 4.  What are the "ingredients" of modified constraint-induced therapy? An evidence-based review, recipe, and recommendations.

Authors:  Stephen J Page; Shaun Boe; Peter Levine
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 5.  Mental practice: applying motor PRACTICE and neuroplasticity principles to increase upper extremity function.

Authors:  Stephen J Page; Heather Peters
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Validity of movement pattern kinematics as measures of arm motor impairment poststroke.

Authors:  Sandeep K Subramanian; Juri Yamanaka; Gevorg Chilingaryan; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.

Authors:  P W Duncan; D Wallace; S M Lai; D Johnson; S Embretson; L J Laster
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months.

Authors:  A Heller; D T Wade; V A Wood; A Sunderland; R L Hewer; E Ward
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Electromyography-controlled exoskeletal upper-limb-powered orthosis for exercise training after stroke.

Authors:  Joel Stein; Kailas Narendran; John McBean; Kathryn Krebs; Richard Hughes
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.159

10.  Intensive sensorimotor arm training mediated by therapist or robot improves hemiparesis in patients with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Bruce T Volpe; Daniel Lynch; Avrielle Rykman-Berland; Mark Ferraro; Michael Galgano; Neville Hogan; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.919

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke.

Authors:  Jan Mehrholz; Marcus Pohl; Thomas Platz; Joachim Kugler; Bernhard Elsner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-03

2.  Feasibility and clinical experience of implementing a myoelectric upper limb orthosis in the rehabilitation of chronic stroke patients: A clinical case series report.

Authors:  Jessica P McCabe; Dennyse Henniger; Jessica Perkins; Margaret Skelly; Curtis Tatsuoka; Svetlana Pundik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Myoelectric Arm Orthosis in Motor Learning-Based Therapy for Chronic Deficits After Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Svetlana Pundik; Jessica McCabe; Margaret Skelly; Ahlam Salameh; Jonathan Naft; Zhengyi Chen; Curtis Tatsuoka; Stefania Fatone
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.003

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.