Literature DB >> 18184932

Intensive sensorimotor arm training mediated by therapist or robot improves hemiparesis in patients with chronic stroke.

Bruce T Volpe1, Daniel Lynch, Avrielle Rykman-Berland, Mark Ferraro, Michael Galgano, Neville Hogan, Hermano I Krebs.   

Abstract

Investigators have demonstrated that a variety of intensive movement training protocols for persistent upper limb paralysis in patients with chronic stroke (6 months or more after stroke) improve motor outcome. This randomized controlled study determined in patients with upper limb motor impairment after chronic stroke whether movement therapy delivered by a robot or by a therapist using an intensive training protocol was superior. Robotic training (n = 11) and an intensive movement protocol (n = 10) improved the impairment measures of motor outcome significantly and comparably; there were no significant changes in disability measures. Motor gains were maintained at the 3-month evaluation after training. These data contribute to the growing awareness that persistent impairments in those with chronic stroke may not reflect exhausted capacity for improvement. These new protocols, rendered by either therapist or robot, can be standardized, tested, and replicated, and potentially will contribute to rational activity-based programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18184932      PMCID: PMC4943019          DOI: 10.1177/1545968307311102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  32 in total

Review 1.  Cellular and molecular mechanisms of neural repair after stroke: making waves.

Authors:  S Thomas Carmichael
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.422

2.  Early and repetitive stimulation of the arm can substantially improve the long-term outcome after stroke: a 5-year follow-up study of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Hilde Feys; Willy De Weerdt; Geert Verbeke; Gail Cox Steck; Chris Capiau; Carlotte Kiekens; Eddy Dejaeger; Gustaaf Van Hoydonck; Guido Vermeersch; Patrick Cras
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Motions or muscles? Some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery.

Authors:  Neville Hogan; Hermano I Krebs; Brandon Rohrer; Jerome J Palazzolo; Laura Dipietro; Susan E Fasoli; Joel Stein; Richard Hughes; Walter R Frontera; Daniel Lynch; Bruce T Volpe
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2006 Aug-Sep

4.  Increasing productivity and quality of care: robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation.

Authors:  H I Krebs; B T Volpe; M L Aisen; N Hogan
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

5.  Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct.

Authors:  R J Nudo; B M Wise; F SiFuentes; G W Milliken
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The application of physiological principles to stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  B Bobath
Journal:  Practitioner       Date:  1979-12

7.  A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research.

Authors:  R C Lyle
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.479

8.  Stochastic estimation of arm mechanical impedance during robotic stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jerome J Palazzolo; Mark Ferraro; Hermano Igo Krebs; Daniel Lynch; Bruce T Volpe; Neville Hogan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.

Authors:  H S Jørgensen; H Nakayama; H O Raaschou; J Vive-Larsen; M Støier; T S Olsen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Leonard E Kahn; Michele L Zygman; W Zev Rymer; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  73 in total

1.  A comparison of motor adaptations to robotically facilitated upper extremity task practice demonstrated by children with cerebral palsy and adults with stroke.

Authors:  Qinyin Qiu; Sergei Adamovich; Soha Saleh; Ian Lafond; Alma S Merians; Gerard G Fluet
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Home-based therapy programmes for upper limb functional recovery following stroke.

Authors:  Fiona Coupar; Alex Pollock; Lynn A Legg; Catherine Sackley; Paulette van Vliet
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-05-16

3.  Breaking it down is better: haptic decomposition of complex movements aids in robot-assisted motor learning.

Authors:  Julius Klein; Steven J Spencer; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  An economic analysis of robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke.

Authors:  Todd H Wagner; Albert C Lo; Peter Peduzzi; Dawn M Bravata; Grant D Huang; Hermano I Krebs; Robert J Ringer; Daniel G Federman; Lorie G Richards; Jodie K Haselkorn; George F Wittenberg; Bruce T Volpe; Christopher T Bever; Pamela W Duncan; Andrew Siroka; Peter D Guarino
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  New Directions in Treatments Targeting Stroke Recovery.

Authors:  David J Lin; Seth P Finklestein; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Current Trends in Robot-Assisted Upper-Limb Stroke Rehabilitation: Promoting Patient Engagement in Therapy.

Authors:  Amy A Blank; James A French; Ali Utku Pehlivan; Marcia K O'Malley
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2014-09

7.  Vagus nerve stimulation delivered during motor rehabilitation improves recovery in a rat model of stroke.

Authors:  Navid Khodaparast; Seth A Hays; Andrew M Sloan; Tabbassum Fayyaz; Daniel R Hulsey; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Robotics: A Rehabilitation Modality.

Authors:  Hermano Igo Krebs; Bruce T Volpe
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2015-10-13

Review 9.  Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective.

Authors:  Vincent S Huang; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Effects of intensive arm training with the rehabilitation robot ARMin II in chronic stroke patients: four single-cases.

Authors:  Patricia Staubli; Tobias Nef; Verena Klamroth-Marganska; Robert Riener
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.