Literature DB >> 23396369

What are the "ingredients" of modified constraint-induced therapy? An evidence-based review, recipe, and recommendations.

Stephen J Page1, Shaun Boe, Peter Levine.   

Abstract

Modified constraint induced movement therapy (mCIT) increases paretic upper extremity use and movement in all phases of stroke. Although fundamental to its appropriate implementation, specific details on day to day implementation on this promising family of therapies have not heretofore been published. Consequently, some integral behavioral facets of mCIT may be overlooked, while other approaches may be easily mistaken to constitute mCIT, during attempts to implement the therapy. The purpose of this paper is to review mCIT, and to provide the clinician-reader with a detailed description of the "ingredients" of mCIT and their rationale, including clinical examples of these components. It is expected that a more complete understanding of the components comprising this promising approach will overcome knowledge barriers associated with its appropriate use, and encourage better patient management in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23396369     DOI: 10.3233/RNN-120264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  10 in total

1.  Retention of the spacing effect with mental practice in hemiparetic stroke.

Authors:  Stephen J Page; Erinn M Hade; Juan Pang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Portable Myoelectric Brace Use Increases Upper Extremity Recovery and Participation But Does Not Impact Kinematics in Chronic, Poststroke Hemiparesis.

Authors:  Nienke W Willigenburg; Michael P McNally; Timothy E Hewett; Stephen J Page
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Examining the use of constraint-induced movement therapy in canadian neurological occupational and physical therapy.

Authors:  Alana Fleet; Marion Che; Marilyn Mackay-Lyons; Diane Mackenzie; Stephen Page; Gail Eskes; Alison McDonald; Joy Boyce; Shaun Boe
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  Mental practice--triggered electrical stimulation in chronic, moderate, upper-extremity hemiparesis after stroke.

Authors:  Stephen J Page; Peter Levine; Valerie Hill
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

5.  Matching Task Difficulty to Patient Ability During Task Practice Improves Upper Extremity Motor Skill After Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Michelle L Woodbury; Kelly Anderson; Christian Finetto; Andrew Fortune; Blair Dellenbach; Emily Grattan; Scott Hutchison
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 6.  Moving Forward by Stimulating the Brain: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Post-Stroke Hemiparesis.

Authors:  Heather T Peters; Dylan J Edwards; Susan Wortman-Jutt; Stephen J Page
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Combined Action Observation and Motor Imagery Neurofeedback for Modulation of Brain Activity.

Authors:  Christopher L Friesen; Timothy Bardouille; Heather F Neyedli; Shaun G Boe
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  The Effects of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on Functions of Cerebral Palsy Children.

Authors:  Ali Reza Jamali; Malek Amini
Journal:  Iran J Child Neurol       Date:  2018

Review 9.  Time to reconcile research findings and clinical practice on upper limb neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Leonardo Boccuni; Lucio Marinelli; Carlo Trompetto; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; José María Tormos Muñoz
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 10.  Dose and timing in neurorehabilitation: prescribing motor therapy after stroke.

Authors:  Catherine E Lang; Keith R Lohse; Rebecca L Birkenmeier
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.283

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.