Literature DB >> 27747877

Behavioral pharmacology of the odor span task: Effects of flunitrazepam, ketamine, methamphetamine and methylphenidate.

Mark Galizio1, Brooke April1, Melissa Deal1, Andrew Hawkey1, Danielle Panoz-Brown1, Ashley Prichard1, Katherine Bruce1.   

Abstract

The Odor Span Task is an incrementing non-matching-to-sample procedure that permits the study of behavior under the control of multiple stimuli. Rats are exposed to a series of odor stimuli and selection of new stimuli is reinforced. Successful performance thus requires remembering which stimuli have previously been presented during a given session. This procedure has been frequently used in neurobiological studies as a rodent model of working memory; however, only a few studies have examined the effects of drugs on performance in this task. The present experiments explored the behavioral pharmacology of a modified version of the Odor Span Task by determining the effects of stimulant drugs methylphenidate and methamphetamine, NMDA antagonist ketamine, and positive GABAA modulator flunitrazepam. All four drugs produced dose-dependent impairment of performances on the Odor Span Task, but for methylphenidate and methamphetamine, these occurred only at doses that had similar effects on performance of a simple odor discrimination. Generally, these disruptions were based on omission of responding at the effective doses. The effects of ketamine and flunitrazepam were more selective in some rats. That is, some rats tested under flunitrazepam and ketamine showed decreases in accuracy on the Odor Span Task at doses that did not affect simple discrimination performance. These selective effects indicate disruption of within-session stimulus control. Overall, these findings support the potential of the Odor Span Task as a baseline for the behavioral pharmacological analysis of remembering.
© 2016 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990NMDA antagonist; Odor Span Task; non-matching-to-sample; flunitrazepam; ketamine; methamphetamine; methylphenidate; positive GABAAzzm321990 modulator

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27747877      PMCID: PMC5821115          DOI: 10.1002/jeab.224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  31 in total

1.  Cortical cholinergic inputs mediate processing capacity: effects of 192 IgG-saporin-induced lesions on olfactory span performance.

Authors:  J Turchi; M Sarter
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Animal cognition and the rat olfactory system.

Authors:  B Slotnick
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 3.  Animal models of working memory: a review of tasks that might be used in screening drug treatments for the memory impairments found in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Paul A Dudchenko; John Talpos; Jared Young; Mark G Baxter
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Effects of dizocilpine (MK801) on olfactory span in rats.

Authors:  Dave A MacQueen; Laura Bullard; Mark Galizio
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Titrating-delay matching-to-sample in the pigeon.

Authors:  Brian D Kangas; Manish Vaidya; Marc N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Olfactory Stimulus Control and the Behavioral Pharmacology of Remembering.

Authors:  Mark Galizio
Journal:  Behav Anal (Wash D C)       Date:  2016-03-17

7.  NMDA antagonists produce site-selective impairment of accuracy in a delayed nonmatch-to-sample task in rats.

Authors:  C B Willmore; K L LaVecchia; J L Wiley
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  The odour span task: a novel paradigm for assessing working memory in mice.

Authors:  Jared W Young; Lorraine E Kerr; John S Kelly; Hugh M Marston; Christopher Spratt; Keith Finlayson; John Sharkey
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  Working memory in the odor span task: effects of chlordiazepoxide, dizocilpine (MK801), morphine, and scopolamine.

Authors:  Mark Galizio; Melissa Deal; Andrew Hawkey; Brooke April
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors and AMPA receptors in medial prefrontal cortex are necessary for odor span in rats.

Authors:  Don A Davies; Quentin Greba; John G Howland
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  5 in total

1.  Validation of the human odor span task: effects of nicotine.

Authors:  David A MacQueen; David J Drobes
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Odor span task in dogs (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  Sarah Krichbaum; Bart Rogers; Emma Cox; L Paul Waggoner; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Effects of NMDA antagonist dizocilpine (MK-801) are modulated by the number of distractor stimuli in the rodent odor span task of working memory.

Authors:  Mark Galizio; Melissa Deal; Michael Mathews; Danielle Panoz-Brown; Ashley Prichard; Katherine E Bruce
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Effects of N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists ketamine, methoxetamine, and phencyclidine on the odor span test of working memory in rats.

Authors:  Michael J Mathews; Ralph N Mead; Mark Galizio
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Amnestic drugs in the odor span task: Effects of flunitrazepam, zolpidem and scopolamine.

Authors:  Mark Galizio; Michael Mathews; Madeleine Mason; Danielle Panoz-Brown; Ashley Prichard; Paul Soto
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.877

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.