Literature DB >> 27743793

Identifying chemicals of concern in hydraulic fracturing fluids used for oil production.

William T Stringfellow1, Mary Kay Camarillo2, Jeremy K Domen2, Whitney L Sandelin2, Charuleka Varadharajan3, Preston D Jordan3, Matthew T Reagan3, Heather Cooley4, Matthew G Heberger4, Jens T Birkholzer3.   

Abstract

Chemical additives used for hydraulic fracturing and matrix acidizing of oil reservoirs were reviewed and priority chemicals of concern needing further environmental risk assessment, treatment demonstration, or evaluation of occupational hazards were identified. We evaluated chemical additives used for well stimulation in California, the third largest oil producing state in the USA, by the mass and frequency of use, as well as toxicity. The most frequently used chemical additives in oil development were gelling agents, cross-linkers, breakers, clay control agents, iron and scale control agents, corrosion inhibitors, biocides, and various impurities and product stabilizers used as part of commercial mixtures. Hydrochloric and hydrofluoric acids, used for matrix acidizing and other purposes, were reported infrequently. A large number and mass of solvents and surface active agents were used, including quaternary ammonia compounds (QACs) and nonionic surfactants. Acute toxicity was evaluated and many chemicals with low hazard to mammals were identified as potentially hazardous to aquatic environments. Based on an analysis of quantities used, toxicity, and lack of adequate hazard evaluation, QACs, biocides, and corrosion inhibitors were identified as priority chemicals of concern that deserve further investigation. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocides; Corrosion inhibitors; Hydraulic fracturing; Oil production; Produced water; Well stimulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27743793     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.09.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  10 in total

1.  High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Identification of Novel Surfactant-Derived Sulfur-Containing Disinfection Byproducts from Gas Extraction Wastewater.

Authors:  Hannah K Liberatore; Danielle C Westerman; Joshua M Allen; Michael J Plewa; Elizabeth D Wagner; Amy M McKenna; Chad R Weisbrod; James P McCord; Richard J Liberatore; David B Burnett; Leslie H Cizmas; Susan D Richardson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  Impact of upstream oil extraction and environmental public health: A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Jill E Johnston; Esther Lim; Hannah Roh
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  Chemical Exposures, Health, and Environmental Justice in Communities Living on the Fenceline of Industry.

Authors:  Jill Johnston; Lara Cushing
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2020-03

4.  Biological effects of inhaled hydraulic fracturing sand dust VII. Neuroinflammation and altered synaptic protein expression.

Authors:  Krishnan Sriram; Gary X Lin; Amy M Jefferson; Walter McKinney; Mark C Jackson; Amy Cumpston; Jared L Cumpston; James B Cumpston; Howard D Leonard; Michael Kashon; Jeffrey S Fedan
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 5.  Critical evaluation of human health risks due to hydraulic fracturing in natural gas and petroleum production.

Authors:  Klaus-Michael Wollin; G Damm; H Foth; A Freyberger; T Gebel; A Mangerich; U Gundert-Remy; F Partosch; C Röhl; T Schupp; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Biological effects of inhaled hydraulic fracturing sand dust. I. Scope of the investigation.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Fedan
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Comparison of chemical-use between hydraulic fracturing, acidizing, and routine oil and gas development.

Authors:  William T Stringfellow; Mary Kay Camarillo; Jeremy K Domen; Seth B C Shonkoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Spatial Modeling to Identify Sociodemographic Predictors of Hydraulic Fracturing Wastewater Injection Wells in Ohio Census Block Groups.

Authors:  Genevieve S Silva; Joshua L Warren; Nicole C Deziel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Community-Based Health and Exposure Study around Urban Oil Developments in South Los Angeles.

Authors:  Bhavna Shamasunder; Ashley Collier-Oxandale; Jessica Blickley; James Sadd; Marissa Chan; Sandy Navarro; Michael Hannigan; Nicole J Wong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Flaring from Unconventional Oil and Gas Development and Birth Outcomes in the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas.

Authors:  Lara J Cushing; Kate Vavra-Musser; Khang Chau; Meredith Franklin; Jill E Johnston
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.