Literature DB >> 22645815

Aquatic and terrestrial organic matter in the diet of stream consumers: implications for mercury bioaccumulation.

Timothy D Jardine1, Karen A Kidd, Joseph B Rasmussen.   

Abstract

The relative contribution of aquatic vs. terrestrial organic matter to the diet of consumers in fluvial environments and its effects on bioaccumulation of contaminants such as mercury (Hg) remain poorly understood. We used stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen in a gradient approach (consumer isotope ratio vs. periphyton isotope ratio) across temperate streams that range in their pH to assess consumer reliance on aquatic (periphyton) vs. terrestrial (riparian vegetation) organic matter, and whether Hg concentrations in fish and their prey were related to these energy sources. Taxa varied in their use of the two sources, with grazing mayflies (Heptageniidae), predatory stoneflies (Perlidae), one species of water strider (Metrobates hesperius), and the fish blacknose dace (Rhinichthys atratulus) showing strong connections to aquatic sources, while Aquarius remigis water striders and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) showed a weak link to in-stream production. The aquatic food source for consumers, periphyton, had higher Hg concentrations in low-pH waters, and pH was a much better predictor of Hg in predatory invertebrates that relied mainly on this food source vs. those that used terrestrial C. These findings suggest that stream biota relying mainly on dietary inputs from the riparian zone will be partially insulated from the effects of water chemistry on Hg availability. This has implications for the development of a whole-system understanding of nutrient and material cycling in streams, the choice of taxa in contaminant monitoring studies, and in understanding the fate of Hg in stream food webs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22645815     DOI: 10.1890/11-0874.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  11 in total

1.  Environmental, geographic and trophic influences on methylmercury concentrations in macroinvertebrates from lakes and wetlands across Canada.

Authors:  Meredith G Clayden; Karen A Kidd; John Chételat; Britt D Hall; Edenise Garcia
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Use of Stable Isotopes in Benthic Organic Material as a Baseline for Estimating Fish Trophic Positions in Lakes.

Authors:  James L Lake; Jonathan R Serbst; Anne Kuhn; Nathan J Smucker; Phillip Edwards; Alan Libby; Michael Charpentier; Kenneth Miller
Journal:  Can J Fish Aquat Sci       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.595

3.  Fracked ecology: Response of aquatic trophic structure and mercury biomagnification dynamics in the Marcellus Shale Formation.

Authors:  Christopher James Grant; Allison K Lutz; Aaron D Kulig; Mitchell R Stanton
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Factors affecting MeHg bioaccumulation in stream biota: the role of dissolved organic carbon and diet.

Authors:  Hannah J Broadley; Kathryn L Cottingham; Nicholas A Baer; Kathleen C Weathers; Holly A Ewing; Ramsa Chaves-Ulloa; Jessica Chickering; Adam M Wilson; Jenisha Shrestha; Celia Y Chen
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Influence of a chlor-alkali superfund site on mercury bioaccumulation in periphyton and low-trophic level fauna.

Authors:  Kate L Buckman; Mark Marvin-DiPasquale; Vivien F Taylor; Ann Chalmers; Hannah J Broadley; Jennifer Agee; Brian P Jackson; Celia Y Chen
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Timber harvest alters mercury bioaccumulation and food web structure in headwater streams.

Authors:  James J Willacker; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Brandon M Kowalski; Robert J Danehy; Allyson K Jackson; Evan M Adams; David C Evers; Chris S Eckley; Michael T Tate; David P Krabbenhoft
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Dissolved organic carbon modulates mercury concentrations in insect subsidies from streams to terrestrial consumers.

Authors:  Ramsa Chaves-Ulloa; Brad W Taylor; Hannah J Broadley; Kathryn L Cottingham; Nicholas A Baer; Kathleen C Weathers; Holly A Ewing; Celia Y Chen
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.657

8.  Mercury bioaccumulation in Southern Appalachian birds, assessed through feather concentrations.

Authors:  Rebecca Hylton Keller; Lingtian Xie; David B Buchwalter; Kathleen E Franzreb; Theodore R Simons
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Do low-mercury terrestrial resources subsidize low-mercury growth of stream fish? Differences between species along a productivity gradient.

Authors:  Darren M Ward; Keith H Nislow; Carol L Folt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Influence of dietary carbon on mercury bioaccumulation in streams of the Adirondack Mountains of New York and the Coastal Plain of South Carolina, USA.

Authors:  Karen Riva-Murray; Paul M Bradley; Lia C Chasar; Daniel T Button; Mark E Brigham; Barbara C Scudder Eikenberry; Celeste A Journey; Michelle A Lutz
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.