| Literature DB >> 27743116 |
Marcus R Makowski1,2,3,4,5, Christian H P Jansen1, Ullrich Ebersberger6, Tobias Schaeffter1,2,3,4, Reza Razavi1,2,3,4, Massimo Mangino7,8, Tim D Spector6, Rene M Botnar1,2,3,4, Gerald F Greil9,10,11,12.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of BMI on late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) of the coronary artery wall in identical monozygous twins discordant for BMI. Coronary LGE represents a useful parameter for the detection and quantification of atherosclerotic coronary vessel wall disease.Entities:
Keywords: 3D-IR-TFE; Coronary; MRI; Twin; Vessel wall scan
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27743116 PMCID: PMC5635090 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4616-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Radiol ISSN: 0938-7994 Impact factor: 5.315
Characteristics of the trial participants
| Characteristics | Twin group 1 | Twin group 2 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Low BMI | High BMI | ||
| Age - yrs | |||
| Mean | 58 | 58 | 1 |
| Range | 37–70 | 37–70 | |
| Female - no. (%) | 13 (100) | 13 (100) | 1 |
| Body mass index | |||
| Mean | 29.6 | 35.8 | <0.001 |
| Range | 20.1–40.5 | 26.3–52.5 | |
| Framingham risk score | |||
| Mean | 13.4 | 16.4 | 0.02 |
| Range | 5–18 | 10–20 | |
| Blood pressure - mm Hg | |||
| Systolic | |||
| Mean | 137 | 145 | 0.19 |
| Range | 113–173 | 120–180 | |
| Diastolic | |||
| Mean | 79 | 86 | 0.24 |
| Range | 65–98 | 67–107 | |
| Current Ssmoker - no. (%) | 0 (0) | 1 (8) | |
| HDL cholesterol - mmol/l | |||
| Mean | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.32 |
| Range | 0.7–2.3 | 0.8–1.7 | |
| Total cholesterol - mmol/l | |||
| Mean | 5.4 | 6.5 | 0.01 |
| Range | 2.8–7.3 | 4.7–7.6 | |
The mean and range of relevant factors are given for all twins, for the twin group with low BMI and for the twin group with high BMI. Differences between these two groups are also reported.
Fig. 1MRI pulse diagram for the visualization and quantification of the contrast agent in the coronary wall. a coronary navigator-gated, vector ECG-triggered, fat-suppressed T1-weighted, three-dimensional gradient-echo inversion recovery sequence (3D-IR-TFE) was performed prior to and 30 to 40 minutes after the administration of Gd-DTPA (0.2 mmol/kg). Image acquisition was performed in mid-diastole. Additionally, to compensate for breathing, navigator gating and tracking was performed
Fig. 2Segmental model for the assessment of coronary enhancement. Coronary arteries were subdivided into eight segments. For an accurate identification of the segments, the segments were pre-defined according to distance from the coronary origin in the aortic root. The right coronary artery (RCA, a) was analyzed in 3 segments (1–3), the left coronary artery (LCA, b) within the left main artery (1 segment, 5), the left anterior descending (2 segments, 6, 7), and the circumflex artery (2 segments, 11, 13)
Fig. 3Assessment of coronary enhancement after the administration of Gd-DTPA in monozygous twins. a–d: Fusion images (a, c) of coronary MRAs with matched vessel wall scans. Typical example of the enhancement pattern (b, d) in the left and right coronary artery in twins with a low BMI after administration of the Gd-DTPA. Only a mild signal enhancement can be appreciated in the left and right coronary artery. e–h: Example of coronary enhancement in twins with a high BMI on fused images (e, g) as well as inversion recovery images (f, h). A relatively strong coronary enhancement can be observed in the proximal right and left coronary artery (red arrow)
Fig. 4Comparison of number of coronary segments with enhancement after administration of the contrast agent. The group with the high BMI showed a significantly increased number of coronary segments per subject with gadolinium enhancement compared to the twin group with the low BMI
Fig. 5Comparison of coronary contrast to noise ratios (CNRs) after administration of the contrast agent. The group with the high BMI showed a significantly increased CNR following the administration of the contrast agent compared to the twin group with the low BMI. Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation