Literature DB >> 27742670

Screening Men at Increased Risk for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Model Estimates of Benefits and Harms.

Roman Gulati1, Heather H Cheng2, Paul H Lange3, Peter S Nelson2, Ruth Etzioni2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for PSA screening in subgroups with increased risk of prostate cancer diagnosis due to race or genotype are underdeveloped. Our goal was to investigate types of increased prostate cancer risk and implications for targeted screening.
METHODS: We investigated computer simulation of subgroups with average and hypothetical increased risk(s) of onset of latent disease, progression, and/or cancer-specific death. For each subgroup, we predicted lifetime probabilities of overdiagnosis and life saved under more and less intensive PSA screening strategies. An application estimated risks of onset among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in the Identification of Men with a genetic predisposition to ProstAte Cancer: Targeted screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and controls (IMPACT) study using maximum likelihood.
RESULTS: Our simulations implied PSA screening can save more lives among subgroups with increased risk than with average risk, but more intensive screening did not always improve harm-benefit trade-offs. IMPACT data were consistent with increased risks of onset among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers [HR = 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63-1.59 and HR = 1.81; 95% CI, 1.14-2.78, respectively]. Our analysis suggests screening BRCA2 mutation carriers earlier and more frequently than the average-risk population, but a lower PSA threshold for biopsy is unlikely to improve outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Effective screening in men with increased prostate cancer risk depends on the manner in which the risk is increased. More intensive screening is not always optimal. IMPACT: Guidelines for screening men at increased prostate cancer risk should consider the mechanism inducing the increased risk. Although the benefit of screening may be greater in men with increased risks, more intensive screening is not always appropriate. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(2); 222-7. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27742670      PMCID: PMC5296376          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  30 in total

1.  Screening sensitivity and sojourn time from breast cancer early detection clinical trials: mammograms and physical examinations.

Authors:  Y Shen; M Zelen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Calibrating disease progression models using population data: a critical precursor to policy development in cancer control.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Lurdes Inoue; Jeffrey Katcher; William Hazelton; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Hereditary prostate cancer: epidemiologic and clinical features.

Authors:  B S Carter; G S Bova; T H Beaty; G D Steinberg; B Childs; W B Isaacs; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy versus external-beam radiotherapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephen A Boorjian; R Jeffrey Karnes; Rosalia Viterbo; Laureano J Rangel; Eric J Bergstralh; Eric M Horwitz; Michael L Blute; Mark K Buyyounouski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer incidence trends.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; David F Penson; Julie M Legler; Dante di Tommaso; Rob Boer; Peter H Gann; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-07-03       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Hans Garmo; Jennifer R Rider; Kimmo Taari; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Anders Spångberg; Ove Andrén; Juni Palmgren; Gunnar Steineck; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Effect of BRCA Mutations on Metastatic Relapse and Cause-specific Survival After Radical Treatment for Localised Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Elena Castro; Chee Goh; Daniel Leongamornlert; Ed Saunders; Malgorzata Tymrakiewicz; Tokhir Dadaev; Koveela Govindasami; Michelle Guy; Steve Ellis; Debra Frost; Elizabeth Bancroft; Trevor Cole; Marc Tischkowitz; M John Kennedy; Jacqueline Eason; Carole Brewer; D Gareth Evans; Rosemarie Davidson; Diana Eccles; Mary E Porteous; Fiona Douglas; Julian Adlard; Alan Donaldson; Antonis C Antoniou; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Douglas F Easton; David Olmos; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Targeted prostate cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from the initial screening round of the IMPACT study.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Bancroft; Elizabeth C Page; Elena Castro; Hans Lilja; Andrew Vickers; Daniel Sjoberg; Melissa Assel; Christopher S Foster; Gillian Mitchell; Kate Drew; Lovise Mæhle; Karol Axcrona; D Gareth Evans; Barbara Bulman; Diana Eccles; Donna McBride; Christi van Asperen; Hans Vasen; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Janneke Ringelberg; Cezary Cybulski; Dominika Wokolorczyk; Christina Selkirk; Peter J Hulick; Anders Bojesen; Anne-Bine Skytte; Jimmy Lam; Louise Taylor; Rogier Oldenburg; Ruben Cremers; Gerald Verhaegh; Wendy A van Zelst-Stams; Jan C Oosterwijk; Ignacio Blanco; Monica Salinas; Jackie Cook; Derek J Rosario; Saundra Buys; Tom Conner; Margreet G Ausems; Kai-ren Ong; Jonathan Hoffman; Susan Domchek; Jacquelyn Powers; Manuel R Teixeira; Sofia Maia; William D Foulkes; Nassim Taherian; Marielle Ruijs; Apollonia T Helderman-van den Enden; Louise Izatt; Rosemarie Davidson; Muriel A Adank; Lisa Walker; Rita Schmutzler; Kathy Tucker; Judy Kirk; Shirley Hodgson; Marion Harris; Fiona Douglas; Geoffrey J Lindeman; Janez Zgajnar; Marc Tischkowitz; Virginia E Clowes; Rachel Susman; Teresa Ramón y Cajal; Nicholas Patcher; Neus Gadea; Allan Spigelman; Theo van Os; Annelie Liljegren; Lucy Side; Carole Brewer; Angela F Brady; Alan Donaldson; Vigdis Stefansdottir; Eitan Friedman; Rakefet Chen-Shtoyerman; David J Amor; Lucia Copakova; Julian Barwell; Veda N Giri; Vedang Murthy; Nicola Nicolai; Soo-Hwang Teo; Lynn Greenhalgh; Sara Strom; Alex Henderson; John McGrath; David Gallagher; Neil Aaronson; Audrey Ardern-Jones; Chris Bangma; David Dearnaley; Philandra Costello; Jorunn Eyfjord; Jeanette Rothwell; Alison Falconer; Henrik Gronberg; Freddie C Hamdy; Oskar Johannsson; Vincent Khoo; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Jan Lubinski; Ulrika Axcrona; Jane Melia; Joanne McKinley; Anita V Mitra; Clare Moynihan; Gad Rennert; Mohnish Suri; Penny Wilson; Emma Killick; Sue Moss; Rosalind A Eeles
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Inherited DNA-Repair Gene Mutations in Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Colin C Pritchard; Joaquin Mateo; Michael F Walsh; Navonil De Sarkar; Wassim Abida; Himisha Beltran; Andrea Garofalo; Roman Gulati; Suzanne Carreira; Rosalind Eeles; Olivier Elemento; Mark A Rubin; Dan Robinson; Robert Lonigro; Maha Hussain; Arul Chinnaiyan; Jake Vinson; Julie Filipenko; Levi Garraway; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Saud AlDubayan; G Celine Han; Mallory Beightol; Colm Morrissey; Belinda Nghiem; Heather H Cheng; Bruce Montgomery; Tom Walsh; Silvia Casadei; Michael Berger; Liying Zhang; Ahmet Zehir; Joseph Vijai; Howard I Scher; Charles Sawyers; Nikolaus Schultz; Philip W Kantoff; David Solit; Mark Robson; Eliezer M Van Allen; Kenneth Offit; Johann de Bono; Peter S Nelson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  12 in total

1.  Prostate Cancer Incidence 5 Years After US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations Against Screening.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; MaryBeth B Culp; Jiemin Ma; Farhad Islami; Stacey A Fedewa
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Is prostate cancer different in black men? Answers from 3 natural history models.

Authors:  Alex Tsodikov; Roman Gulati; Tiago M de Carvalho; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Rachel A Hunter-Merrill; Angela B Mariotto; Harry J de Koning; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Clarifying the Trade-Offs of Risk-Stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Study.

Authors:  Nathaniel Hendrix; Roman Gulati; Boshen Jiao; A Karim Kader; Stephen T Ryan; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Prostate Cancer Screening Guidelines for Black Men: Spotlight on an Empty Stage.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Yaw A Nyame
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Screening the active compounds of Phellodendri Amurensis cortex for treating prostate cancer by high-throughput chinmedomics.

Authors:  Xian-Na Li; Aihua Zhang; Meijia Wang; Hui Sun; Zhidong Liu; Shi Qiu; Tianlei Zhang; Xijun Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Prostate cancer screening-when to start and how to screen?

Authors:  Kimia Kohestani; Marina Chilov; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-02

Review 7.  Stopping screening, when and how?

Authors:  Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-02

8.  Cost-effectiveness and Benefit-to-Harm Ratio of Risk-Stratified Screening for Breast Cancer: A Life-Table Model.

Authors:  Nora Pashayan; Steve Morris; Fiona J Gilbert; Paul D P Pharoah
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 31.777

9.  High-dose vitamin D supplementation to prevent prostate cancer progression in localised cases with low-to-intermediate risk of progression on active surveillance (ProsD): protocol of a phase II randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Visalini Nair-Shalliker; David P Smith; Val Gebski; Manish I Patel; Mark Frydenberg; John W Yaxley; Robert Gardiner; David Espinoza; Michael G Kimlin; Michael Fenech; David Gillatt; Henry Woo; Bruce K Armstrong; Krishan Rasiah; Nader Awad; James Symons; Howard Gurney
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Polygenic risk-tailored screening for prostate cancer: A benefit-harm and cost-effectiveness modelling study.

Authors:  Tom Callender; Mark Emberton; Steve Morris; Ros Eeles; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Paul D P Pharoah; Nora Pashayan
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.