Literature DB >> 36201663

Multiscale Methane Measurements at Oil and Gas Facilities Reveal Necessary Frameworks for Improved Emissions Accounting.

Jiayang Lyra Wang1, William S Daniels2, Dorit M Hammerling2, Matthew Harrison3, Kaylyn Burmaster3, Fiji C George4, Arvind P Ravikumar5.   

Abstract

Methane mitigation from the oil and gas (O&G) sector represents a key near-term global climate action opportunity. Recent legislation in the United States requires updating current methane reporting programs for oil and gas facilities with empirical data. While technological advances have led to improvements in methane emissions measurements and monitoring, the overall effectiveness of mitigation strategies rests on quantifying spatially and temporally varying methane emissions more accurately than the current approaches. In this work, we demonstrate a quantification, monitoring, reporting, and verification framework that pairs snapshot measurements with continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) to reconcile measurements with inventory estimates and account for intermittent emission events. We find that site-level emissions exhibit significant intraday and daily emission variations. Snapshot measurements of methane can span over 3 orders of magnitude and may have limited application in developing annualized inventory estimates at the site level. Consequently, while official inventories underestimate methane emissions on average, emissions at individual facilities can be higher or lower than inventory estimates. Using CEMS, we characterize distributions of frequency and duration of intermittent emission events. Technologies that allow high sampling frequency such as CEMS, paired with a mechanistic understanding of facility-level events, are key to an accurate accounting of short-duration, episodic, and high-volume events that are often missed in snapshot surveys and to scale snapshot measurements to annualized emissions estimates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRV framework; certification; continuous monitoring systems; methane emissions; oil and gas

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36201663      PMCID: PMC9583612          DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c06211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   11.357


  23 in total

1.  Eight-Year Estimates of Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations in Western Canada Are Nearly Twice Those Reported in Inventories.

Authors:  Elton Chan; Douglas E J Worthy; Douglas Chan; Misa Ishizawa; Michael D Moran; Andy Delcloo; Felix Vogel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Aerial Interyear Comparison and Quantification of Methane Emissions Persistence in the Bakken Formation of North Dakota, USA.

Authors:  Jacob G Englander; Adam R Brandt; Stephen Conley; David R Lyon; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Projecting the Temporal Evolution of Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Basins.

Authors:  Felipe J Cardoso-Saldaña; David T Allen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Modeling air emissions from complex facilities at detailed temporal and spatial resolution: The Methane Emission Estimation Tool (MEET).

Authors:  Daniel Zimmerle; Gerald Duggan; Timothy Vaughn; Clay Bell; Christopher Lute; Kristine Bennett; Yosuke Kimura; Felipe J Cardoso-Saldaña; David T Allen
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Where the Methane Is-Insights from Novel Airborne LiDAR Measurements Combined with Ground Survey Data.

Authors:  David R Tyner; Matthew R Johnson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Spatiotemporal Variability of Methane Emissions at Oil and Natural Gas Operations in the Eagle Ford Basin.

Authors:  Tegan N Lavoie; Paul B Shepson; Maria O L Cambaliza; Brian H Stirm; Stephen Conley; Shobhit Mehrotra; Ian C Faloona; David Lyon
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain.

Authors:  Ramón A Alvarez; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; David T Allen; Zachary R Barkley; Adam R Brandt; Kenneth J Davis; Scott C Herndon; Daniel J Jacob; Anna Karion; Eric A Kort; Brian K Lamb; Thomas Lauvaux; Joannes D Maasakkers; Anthony J Marchese; Mark Omara; Stephen W Pacala; Jeff Peischl; Allen L Robinson; Paul B Shepson; Colm Sweeney; Amy Townsend-Small; Steven C Wofsy; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Super-emitters in natural gas infrastructure are caused by abnormal process conditions.

Authors:  Daniel Zavala-Araiza; Ramón A Alvarez; David R Lyon; David T Allen; Anthony J Marchese; Daniel J Zimmerle; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Quantifying methane emissions from the largest oil-producing basin in the United States from space.

Authors:  Yuzhong Zhang; Ritesh Gautam; Sudhanshu Pandey; Mark Omara; Joannes D Maasakkers; Pankaj Sadavarte; David Lyon; Hannah Nesser; Melissa P Sulprizio; Daniel J Varon; Ruixiong Zhang; Sander Houweling; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; Ramon A Alvarez; Alba Lorente; Steven P Hamburg; Ilse Aben; Daniel J Jacob
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Temporal variability largely explains top-down/bottom-up difference in methane emission estimates from a natural gas production region.

Authors:  Timothy L Vaughn; Clay S Bell; Cody K Pickering; Stefan Schwietzke; Garvin A Heath; Gabrielle Pétron; Daniel J Zimmerle; Russell C Schnell; Dag Nummedal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.