Literature DB >> 27739635

Quantifying functional connectivity in multi-subject fMRI data using component models.

Kristoffer H Madsen1,2, Nathan W Churchill2,3, Morten Mørup2.   

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is increasingly used to characterize functional connectivity between brain regions. Given the vast number of between-voxel interactions in high-dimensional fMRI data, it is an ongoing challenge to detect stable and generalizable functional connectivity in the brain among groups of subjects. Component models can be used to define subspace representations of functional connectivity that are more interpretable. It is, however, unclear which component model provides the optimal representation of functional networks for multi-subject fMRI datasets. A flexible cross-validation approach that assesses the ability of the models to predict voxel-wise covariance in new data, using three different measures of generalization was proposed. This framework is used to compare a range of component models with varying degrees of flexibility in their representation of functional connectivity, evaluated on both simulated and experimental resting-state fMRI data. It was demonstrated that highly flexible subject-specific component subspaces, as well as very constrained average models, are poor predictors of whole-brain functional connectivity, whereas the best-generalizing models account for subject variability within a common spatial subspace. Within this set of models, spatial Independent Component Analysis (sICA) on concatenated data provides more interpretable brain patterns, whereas a consistent-covariance model that accounts for subject-specific network scaling (PARAFAC2) provides greater stability in functional connectivity relationships between components and their spatial representations. The proposed evaluation framework is a promising quantitative approach to evaluating component models, and reveals important differences between subspace models in terms of predictability, robustness, characterization of subject variability, and interpretability of the model parameters. Hum Brain Mapp 38:882-899, 2017.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  brain connectivity; decomposition; functional magnetic resonance imaging; independent component analysis; resting-state

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27739635      PMCID: PMC6866892          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  49 in total

1.  Generalizable patterns in neuroimaging: how many principal components?

Authors:  L K Hansen; J Larsen; F A Nielsen; S C Strother; E Rostrup; R Savoy; N Lange; J Sidtis; C Svarer; O B Paulson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Template based rotation: a method for functional connectivity analysis with a priori templates.

Authors:  Aaron P Schultz; Jasmeer P Chhatwal; Willem Huijbers; Trey Hedden; Koene R A van Dijk; Donald G McLaren; Andrew M Ward; Sarah Wigman; Reisa A Sperling
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks.

Authors:  Michael D Fox; Abraham Z Snyder; Justin L Vincent; Maurizio Corbetta; David C Van Essen; Marcus E Raichle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A unified framework for group independent component analysis for multi-subject fMRI data.

Authors:  Ying Guo; Giuseppe Pagnoni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Group information guided ICA for fMRI data analysis.

Authors:  Yuhui Du; Yong Fan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Functional connectivity: the principal-component analysis of large (PET) data sets.

Authors:  K J Friston; C D Frith; P F Liddle; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 8.  Small-world brain networks.

Authors:  Danielle Smith Bassett; Ed Bullmore
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.519

9.  Classification of schizophrenia patients based on resting-state functional network connectivity.

Authors:  Mohammad R Arbabshirani; Kent A Kiehl; Godfrey D Pearlson; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Which fMRI clustering gives good brain parcellations?

Authors:  Bertrand Thirion; Gaël Varoquaux; Elvis Dohmatob; Jean-Baptiste Poline
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  7 in total

1.  Perspectives on Machine Learning for Classification of Schizotypy Using fMRI Data.

Authors:  Kristoffer H Madsen; Laerke G Krohne; Xin-Lu Cai; Yi Wang; Raymond C K Chan
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Exploring individual and group differences in latent brain networks using cross-validated simultaneous component analysis.

Authors:  Nathaniel E Helwig; Matthew A Snodgress
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Taking the 4D Nature of fMRI Data Into Account Promises Significant Gains in Data Completion.

Authors:  Irina Belyaeva; Suchita Bhinge; Qunfang Long; Tülay Adali
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  Unraveling Diagnostic Biomarkers of Schizophrenia Through Structure-Revealing Fusion of Multi-Modal Neuroimaging Data.

Authors:  Evrim Acar; Carla Schenker; Yuri Levin-Schwartz; Vince D Calhoun; Tülay Adali
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Covariance and Correlation Analysis of Resting State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Acquired in a Clinical Trial of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction and Exercise in Older Individuals.

Authors:  Abraham Z Snyder; Tomoyuki Nishino; Joshua S Shimony; Eric J Lenze; Julie Loebach Wetherell; Michelle Voegtle; J Philip Miller; Michael D Yingling; Daniel Marcus; Jenny Gurney; Jerrel Rutlin; Drew Scott; Lisa Eyler; Deanna Barch
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Tracing Evolving Networks Using Tensor Factorizations vs. ICA-Based Approaches.

Authors:  Evrim Acar; Marie Roald; Khondoker M Hossain; Vince D Calhoun; Tülay Adali
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 7.  Functional Connectivity Methods and Their Applications in fMRI Data.

Authors:  Yasaman Shahhosseini; Michelle F Miranda
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.524

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.