Literature DB >> 27729357

A Tissue Systems Pathology Test Detects Abnormalities Associated with Prevalent High-Grade Dysplasia and Esophageal Cancer in Barrett's Esophagus.

Rebecca J Critchley-Thorne1, Jon M Davison2, Jeffrey W Prichard3, Lia M Reese4, Yi Zhang4, Kathleen Repa4, Jinhong Li3, David L Diehl3, Nirag C Jhala5, Gregory G Ginsberg5, Maureen DeMarshall5, Tyler Foxwell2, Blair A Jobe6, Ali H Zaidi6, Lucas C Duits7, Jacques J G H M Bergman7, Anil Rustgi5, Gary W Falk5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a need for improved tools to detect high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in patients with Barrett's esophagus. In previous work, we demonstrated that a 3-tier classifier predicted risk of incident progression in Barrett's esophagus. Our aim was to determine whether this risk classifier could detect a field effect in nondysplastic (ND), indefinite for dysplasia (IND), or low-grade dysplasia (LGD) biopsies from Barrett's esophagus patients with prevalent HGD/EAC.
METHODS: We performed a multi-institutional case-control study to evaluate a previously developed risk classifier that is based upon quantitative image features derived from 9 biomarkers and morphology, and predicts risk for HGD/EAC in Barrett's esophagus patients. The risk classifier was evaluated in ND, IND, and LGD biopsies from Barrett's esophagus patients diagnosed with HGD/EAC on repeat endoscopy (prevalent cases, n = 30, median time to HGD/EAC diagnosis 140.5 days) and nonprogressors (controls, n = 145, median HGD/EAC-free surveillance time 2,015 days).
RESULTS: The risk classifier stratified prevalent cases and non-progressor patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk classes [OR, 46.0; 95% confidence interval, 14.86-169 (high-risk vs. low-risk); P < 0.0001]. The classifier also provided independent prognostic information that outperformed the subspecialist and generalist diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: A tissue systems pathology test better predicts prevalent HGD/EAC in Barrett's esophagus patients than pathologic variables. The results indicate that molecular and cellular changes associated with malignant transformation in Barrett's esophagus may be detectable as a field effect using the test. IMPACT: A tissue systems pathology test may provide an objective method to facilitate earlier identification of Barrett's esophagus patients requiring therapeutic intervention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(2); 240-8. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27729357      PMCID: PMC5296366          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  31 in total

1.  Age and sex differences in the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma: results from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Registry (1973-2008).

Authors:  L N Mathieu; N F Kanarek; H-L Tsai; C M Rudin; M V Brock
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 2.  A genetic explanation of Slaughter's concept of field cancerization: evidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  Boudewijn J M Braakhuis; Maarten P Tabor; J Alain Kummer; C René Leemans; Ruud H Brakenhoff
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic surveillance of non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Louisa G Gordon; George C Mayne; Nicholas G Hirst; Timothy Bright; David C Whiteman; David I Watson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Reproducibility of the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett esophagus: a reaffirmation.

Authors:  E Montgomery; M P Bronner; J R Goldblum; J K Greenson; M M Haber; J Hart; L W Lamps; G Y Lauwers; A J Lazenby; D N Lewin; M E Robert; A Y Toledano; Y Shyr; K Washington
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Fields of aberrant CpG island hypermethylation in Barrett's esophagus and associated adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  C A Eads; R V Lord; S K Kurumboor; K Wickramasinghe; M L Skinner; T I Long; J H Peters; T R DeMeester; K D Danenberg; P V Danenberg; P W Laird; K A Skinner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Prospective multivariate analysis of clinical, endoscopic, and histological factors predictive of the development of Barrett's multifocal high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  A P Weston; A S Badr; R S Hassanein
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Durability and predictors of successful radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Sarina Pasricha; William J Bulsiewicz; Kelly E Hathorn; Srinadh Komanduri; V Raman Muthusamy; Richard I Rothstein; Herbert C Wolfsen; Charles J Lightdale; Bergein F Overholt; Daniel S Camara; Evan S Dellon; William D Lyday; Atilla Ertan; Gary W Chmielewski; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Nicholas J Shaheen; Gary W Falk; Prasad G Iyer; Lauren B Gerson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  The Presence of Genetic Mutations at Key Loci Predicts Progression to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Swathi Eluri; William R Brugge; Ebubekir S Daglilar; Sara A Jackson; Mindi A Styn; Keith M Callenberg; Derek C Welch; Todd M Barr; Lucas C Duits; Jacques J Bergman; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Massimiliano di Pietro; Krish Ragunath; Yeng Ang; Jin-Yong Kang; Peter Watson; Nigel Trudgill; Praful Patel; Philip V Kaye; Scott Sanders; Maria O'Donovan; Elizabeth Bird-Lieberman; Pradeep Bhandari; Janusz A Jankowski; Stephen Attwood; Simon L Parsons; Duncan Loft; Jesper Lagergren; Paul Moayyedi; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; John de Caestecker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  15 in total

1.  Predictors of Progression in Barrett's Esophagus with Low-Grade Dysplasia: Results from a Multicenter Prospective BE Registry.

Authors:  Rajesh Krishnamoorthi; Jason T Lewis; Murli Krishna; Nicholas J Crews; Michele L Johnson; Ross A Dierkhising; Brenda F Ginos; Kenneth K Wang; Herbert C Wolfsen; David E Fleischer; Francisco C Ramirez; Navtej S Buttar; David A Katzka; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Point-Counterpoint: Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus, Is It Worthwhile?

Authors:  Fouad Otaki; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Current state of prognostication, therapy and prospective innovations for Barrett's-related esophageal adenocarcinoma: a literature review.

Authors:  Sumeet K Mittal; Joe Abdo; Malika P Adrien; Binyam A Bayu; Jay R Kline; Molly M Sullivan; Devendra K Agrawal
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-08

4.  Prediction of Progression in Barrett's Esophagus Using a Tissue Systems Pathology Test: A Pooled Analysis of International Multicenter Studies.

Authors:  Prasad G Iyer; D Chamil Codipilly; Apoorva K Chandar; Siddharth Agarwal; Kenneth K Wang; Cadman L Leggett; Laureano Rangel Latuche; Phillip J Schulte
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 13.576

Review 5.  Advanced Imaging for Barrett's Esophagus and Early Neoplasia: Surface and Subsurface Imaging for Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Mansoureh Mkarimi; Hiroshi Mashimo
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-10-09

Review 6.  Biomarkers of Barrett's Esophagus: From the Laboratory to Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Vani J A Konda; Rhonda F Souza
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Best Practices in Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Joseph R Triggs; Gary W Falk
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2020-10-21

8.  Independent Blinded Validation of a Tissue Systems Pathology Test to Predict Progression in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Jon M Davison; John Goldblum; Udhayvir Singh Grewal; Kevin McGrath; Kenneth Fasanella; Christopher Deitrick; Aaron D DeWard; Emily A Bossart; Stephen L Hayward; Yi Zhang; Rebecca J Critchley-Thorne; Prashanthi N Thota
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 12.045

Review 9.  Epidemiology of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Implications for Screening and Surveillance.

Authors:  Michael B Cook; Aaron P Thrift
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2020-10-21

10.  Predicting Progression in Barrett's Esophagus: Is the Holy Grail Within Reach?

Authors:  Yi Qin; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 12.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.