Mansoureh Mkarimi1, Hiroshi Mashimo2. 1. VA Boston Healthcare, Harvard Medical School, 1400 VFW Parkway, West Roxbury, MA, 02132, USA. 2. VA Boston Healthcare, Harvard Medical School, 1400 VFW Parkway, West Roxbury, MA, 02132, USA. hmashimo@hms.harvard.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Esophageal adenocarcinoma bears one of the fastest rising incidence of any cancers and generally arises in the setting of gastroesophageal reflux and Barrett's esophagus. However, early detection of neoplasia can be challenging since most patients are asymptomatic until they progress to more advanced and less curable stages, and early dysplastic lesions can be small, multifocal, and difficult to detect. Clearly, new imaging tools are needed in light of sampling error associated with random biopsies, the current standard of practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Advances in endoscopic imaging including virtual chromoendoscopy, confocal laser endomicroscopy, and subsurface imaging with optical coherence tomography have ushered in a new era for detecting subtle neoplastic lesions. Moreover, in light of esophagus-sparing treatments for neoplastic lesions, such tools are likely to guide ablation and follow-up management. While there is no ideal single imaging modality to facilitate improved detection, staging, ablation, and follow-up of patients with dysplastic Barrett's esophagus, new advances in available technology, the potential for multimodal imaging, and the use of computer-aided diagnosis and biomarkers all hold great promise for improving detection and treatment.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Esophageal adenocarcinoma bears one of the fastest rising incidence of any cancers and generally arises in the setting of gastroesophageal reflux and Barrett's esophagus. However, early detection of neoplasia can be challenging since most patients are asymptomatic until they progress to more advanced and less curable stages, and early dysplastic lesions can be small, multifocal, and difficult to detect. Clearly, new imaging tools are needed in light of sampling error associated with random biopsies, the current standard of practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Advances in endoscopic imaging including virtual chromoendoscopy, confocal laser endomicroscopy, and subsurface imaging with optical coherence tomography have ushered in a new era for detecting subtle neoplastic lesions. Moreover, in light of esophagus-sparing treatments for neoplastic lesions, such tools are likely to guide ablation and follow-up management. While there is no ideal single imaging modality to facilitate improved detection, staging, ablation, and follow-up of patients with dysplastic Barrett's esophagus, new advances in available technology, the potential for multimodal imaging, and the use of computer-aided diagnosis and biomarkers all hold great promise for improving detection and treatment.
Authors: Ralf Kiesslich; Liebwin Gossner; Martin Goetz; Alexandra Dahlmann; Michael Vieth; Manfred Stolte; Arthur Hoffman; Michael Jung; Bernhard Nafe; Peter R Galle; Markus F Neurath Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2006-07-13 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Beau A Standish; Kenneth K C Lee; Adrian Mariampillai; Nigel R Munce; Michael K K Leung; Victor X D Yang; I Alex Vitkin Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2010-01-13 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Val J Lowe; Fargol Booya; J G Fletcher; Mark Nathan; Eric Jensen; Brian Mullan; Eric Rohren; Maurits J Wiersema; Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros; Joseph A Murray; Mark S Allen; Michael J Levy; Jonathan E Clain Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Prateek Sharma; Alexander R Meining; Emmanuel Coron; Charles J Lightdale; Herbert C Wolfsen; Ajay Bansal; Monther Bajbouj; Jean-Paul Galmiche; Julian A Abrams; Amit Rastogi; Neil Gupta; Joel E Michalek; Gregory Y Lauwers; Michael B Wallace Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Tsung-Han Tsai; Chao Zhou; Yuankai K Tao; Hsiang-Chieh Lee; Osman O Ahsen; Marisa Figueiredo; Tejas Kirtane; Desmond C Adler; Joseph M Schmitt; Qin Huang; James G Fujimoto; Hiroshi Mashimo Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 9.427