Literature DB >> 27727019

Validation of a Clinical-Grade Assay to Measure Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Marica Grskovic1, David J Hiller2, Lane A Eubank2, John J Sninsky2, Cindy Christopherson2, John P Collins2, Kathryn Thompson2, Mindy Song2, Yue S Wang2, David Ross2, Mitchell J Nelles2, James P Yee2, Judith C Wilber2, Maria G Crespo-Leiro3, Susan L Scott2, Robert N Woodward2.   

Abstract

The use of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a biomarker in transplant recipients offers advantages over invasive tissue biopsy as a quantitative measure for detection of transplant rejection and immunosuppression optimization. However, the fraction of donor-derived cfDNA (dd-cfDNA) in transplant recipient plasma is low and challenging to quantify. Previously reported methods to measure dd-cfDNA require donor and recipient genotyping, which is impractical in clinical settings and adds cost. We developed a targeted next-generation sequencing assay that uses 266 single-nucleotide polymorphisms to accurately quantify dd-cfDNA in transplant recipients without separate genotyping. Analytical performance of the assay was characterized and validated using 1117 samples comprising the National Institute for Standards and Technology Genome in a Bottle human reference genome, independently validated reference materials, and clinical samples. The assay quantifies the fraction of dd-cfDNA in both unrelated and related donor-recipient pairs. The dd-cfDNA assay can reliably measure dd-cfDNA (limit of blank, 0.10%; limit of detection, 0.16%; limit of quantification, 0.20%) across the linear quantifiable range (0.2% to 16%) with across-run CVs of 6.8%. Precision was also evaluated for independently processed clinical sample replicates and is similar to across-run precision. Application of the assay to clinical samples from heart transplant recipients demonstrated increased levels of dd-cfDNA in patients with biopsy-confirmed rejection and decreased levels of dd-cfDNA after successful rejection treatment. This noninvasive clinical-grade sequencing assay can be completed within 3 days, providing the practical turnaround time preferred for transplanted organ surveillance.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27727019     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  59 in total

Review 1.  Liquid biopsies: donor-derived cell-free DNA for the detection of kidney allograft injury.

Authors:  Michael Oellerich; Karen Sherwood; Paul Keown; Ekkehard Schütz; Julia Beck; Johannes Stegbauer; Lars Christian Rump; Philip D Walson
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 2.  Personalized treatment in heart transplantation.

Authors:  Kiran K Khush
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 3.  Transplant genetics and genomics.

Authors:  Joshua Y C Yang; Minnie M Sarwal
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Cell-Free DNA and Active Rejection in Kidney Allografts.

Authors:  Roy D Bloom; Jonathan S Bromberg; Emilio D Poggio; Suphamai Bunnapradist; Anthony J Langone; Puneet Sood; Arthur J Matas; Shikha Mehta; Roslyn B Mannon; Asif Sharfuddin; Bernard Fischbach; Mohanram Narayanan; Stanley C Jordan; David Cohen; Matthew R Weir; David Hiller; Preethi Prasad; Robert N Woodward; Marica Grskovic; John J Sninsky; James P Yee; Daniel C Brennan
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 5.  Advances in Detection of Kidney Transplant Injury.

Authors:  Sanjeeva Herath; Jonathan Erlich; Amy Y M Au; Zoltán H Endre
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.074

6.  Applying rigor and reproducibility standards to assay donor-derived cell-free DNA as a non-invasive method for detection of acute rejection and graft injury after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Sean Agbor-Enoh; Ilker Tunc; Iwijn De Vlaminck; Ulgen Fideli; Andrew Davis; Karen Cuttin; Kenneth Bhatti; Argit Marishta; Michael A Solomon; Annette Jackson; Grace Graninger; Bonnie Harper; Helen Luikart; Jennifer Wylie; Xujing Wang; Gerald Berry; Charles Marboe; Kiran Khush; Jun Zhu; Hannah Valantine
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 7.  Blood-based immunological monitoring after heart transplant. Current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Jignesh K Patel
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-03-02

Review 8.  Myriad Applications of Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Precision Organ Transplant Monitoring.

Authors:  Philip Burnham; Kiran Khush; Iwijn De Vlaminck
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2017-09

Review 9.  Molecular Diagnostic Testing in Cardiac Transplantation.

Authors:  Kiran Khush; Shirin Zarafshar
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Haplotype Counting for Sensitive Chimerism Testing: Potential for Early Leukemia Relapse Detection.

Authors:  Marija Debeljak; Evelina Mocci; Max C Morrison; Aparna Pallavajjalla; Katie Beierl; Marie Amiel; Michaël Noë; Laura D Wood; Ming-Tseh Lin; Christopher D Gocke; Alison P Klein; Ephraim J Fuchs; Richard J Jones; James R Eshleman
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.