Literature DB >> 27726264

Structural brain connectivity and cognitive ability differences: A multivariate distance matrix regression analysis.

Vicente Ponsoda1, Kenia Martínez1,2, José A Pineda-Pardo3, Francisco J Abad1, Julio Olea1, Francisco J Román1,4, Aron K Barbey4, Roberto Colom1.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging research involves analyses of huge amounts of biological data that might or might not be related with cognition. This relationship is usually approached using univariate methods, and, therefore, correction methods are mandatory for reducing false positives. Nevertheless, the probability of false negatives is also increased. Multivariate frameworks have been proposed for helping to alleviate this balance. Here we apply multivariate distance matrix regression for the simultaneous analysis of biological and cognitive data, namely, structural connections among 82 brain regions and several latent factors estimating cognitive performance. We tested whether cognitive differences predict distances among individuals regarding their connectivity pattern. Beginning with 3,321 connections among regions, the 36 edges better predicted by the individuals' cognitive scores were selected. Cognitive scores were related to connectivity distances in both the full (3,321) and reduced (36) connectivity patterns. The selected edges connect regions distributed across the entire brain and the network defined by these edges supports high-order cognitive processes such as (a) (fluid) executive control, (b) (crystallized) recognition, learning, and language processing, and (c) visuospatial processing. This multivariate study suggests that one widespread, but limited number, of regions in the human brain, supports high-level cognitive ability differences. Hum Brain Mapp 38:803-816, 2017.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive differences; multivariate distance matrix regression; structural connectivity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27726264      PMCID: PMC6866971          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  35 in total

Review 1.  How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging?

Authors:  Craig M Bennett; Michael B Miller
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 2.  The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates.

Authors:  Andrea E Cavanna; Michael R Trimble
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Big Correlations in Little Studies: Inflated fMRI Correlations Reflect Low Statistical Power-Commentary on Vul et al. (2009).

Authors:  Tal Yarkoni
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-05

Review 4.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.

Authors:  Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Functional connectivity mapping of the human precuneus by resting state fMRI.

Authors:  Sheng Zhang; Chiang-shan R Li
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A sensitive period for language in the visual cortex: distinct patterns of plasticity in congenitally versus late blind adults.

Authors:  Marina Bedny; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Swethasri Dravida; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 7.  Multiple testing corrections, nonparametric methods, and random field theory.

Authors:  Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  A multivariate distance-based analytic framework for connectome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Zarrar Shehzad; Clare Kelly; Philip T Reiss; R Cameron Craddock; John W Emerson; Katie McMahon; David A Copland; F Xavier Castellanos; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Volumetry of striatum and pallidum in man--anatomy, cytoarchitecture, connections, MRI and aging.

Authors:  J Brabec; J Krásený; P Petrovický
Journal:  Sb Lek       Date:  2003

10.  Statistical properties of multivariate distance matrix regression for high-dimensional data analysis.

Authors:  Matthew A Zapala; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  6 in total

1.  Unique Mapping of Structural and Functional Connectivity on Cognition.

Authors:  Joelle Zimmermann; John D Griffiths; Anthony R McIntosh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Graph Matching Based Connectomic Biomarker with Learning for Brain Disorders.

Authors:  Rui Sherry Shen; Jacob A Alappatt; Drew Parker; Junghoon Kim; Ragini Verma; Yusuf Osmanlıoğlu
Journal:  Uncertain Safe Util Mach Learn Med Imaging Graph Biomed Image Anal (2020)       Date:  2020-10-05

Review 3.  The structural connectome in children: basic concepts, how to build it, and synopsis of challenges for the developing pediatric brain.

Authors:  Avner Meoded; Thierry A G M Huisman; Maria Grazia Sacco Casamassima; George I Jallo; Andrea Poretti
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Abnormalities in the default mode network in late-life depression: A study of resting-state fMRI.

Authors:  Joan Guàrdia-Olmos; Carles Soriano-Mas; Lara Tormo-Rodríguez; Cristina Cañete-Massé; Inés Del Cerro; Mikel Urretavizcaya; José M Menchón; Virgina Soria; Maribel Peró-Cebollero
Journal:  Int J Clin Health Psychol       Date:  2022-05-27

5.  Effective Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease via Multimodal Fusion Analysis Framework.

Authors:  Xia-An Bi; Ruipeng Cai; Yang Wang; Yingchao Liu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Typicality of functional connectivity robustly captures motion artifacts in rs-fMRI across datasets, atlases, and preprocessing pipelines.

Authors:  Jakub Kopal; Anna Pidnebesna; David Tomeček; Jaroslav Tintěra; Jaroslav Hlinka
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.038

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.