Literature DB >> 20392279

How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging?

Craig M Bennett1, Michael B Miller.   

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is one of the most important methods for in vivo investigation of cognitive processes in the human brain. Within the last two decades, an explosion of research has emerged using fMRI, revealing the underpinnings of everything from motor and sensory processes to the foundations of social cognition. While these results have revealed the potential of neuroimaging, important questions regarding the reliability of these results remain unanswered. In this paper, we take a close look at what is currently known about the reliability of fMRI findings. First, we examine the many factors that influence the quality of acquired fMRI data. We also conduct a review of the existing literature to determine if some measure of agreement has emerged regarding the reliability of fMRI. Finally, we provide commentary on ways to improve fMRI reliability and what questions remain unanswered. Reliability is the foundation on which scientific investigation is based. How reliable are the results from fMRI?

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20392279     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05446.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  226 in total

1.  Motor map reliability and aging: a TMS/fMRI study.

Authors:  Keith M McGregor; Haley Carpenter; Erin Kleim; Atchar Sudhyadhom; Keith D White; Andrew J Butler; Jeffrey Kleim; Bruce Crosson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  This is your brain online: the Functional Connectomes Project.

Authors:  Elie Dolgin
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Test-retest reliability of effective connectivity in the face perception network.

Authors:  Stefan Frässle; Frieder Michel Paulus; Sören Krach; Andreas Jansen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  [Functional brain imaging].

Authors:  E R Gizewski
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  Clashing Diagnostic Approaches: DSM-ICD Versus RDoC.

Authors:  Scott O Lilienfeld; Michael T Treadway
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 18.561

6.  Intraclass correlation: Improved modeling approaches and applications for neuroimaging.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Paul A Taylor; Simone P Haller; Katharina Kircanski; Joel Stoddard; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft; Melissa A Brotman; Robert W Cox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Prefrontal recruitment during social rejection predicts greater subsequent self-regulatory imbalance and impairment: neural and longitudinal evidence.

Authors:  David S Chester; C Nathan DeWall
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Event-Related Potentials as Biomarkers of Behavior Change Mechanisms in Substance Use Disorder Treatment.

Authors:  Rebecca J Houston; Nicolas J Schlienz
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-09-23

Review 9.  Obesity and Brain Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Kyoungjune Pak; Seong-Jang Kim; In Joo Kim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-05-19

10.  The Tangled Knots of Neuroscientific Experimentation.

Authors:  Stefan Frisch
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2021-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.