Literature DB >> 27726014

CONUT: a novel independent predictive score for colorectal cancer patients undergoing potentially curative resection.

Ryuma Tokunaga1, Yasuo Sakamoto1, Shigeki Nakagawa1, Mayuko Ohuchi1, Daisuke Izumi1, Keisuke Kosumi1, Katsunobu Taki1, Takaaki Higashi1, Yuji Miyamoto1, Naoya Yoshida1, Eiji Oki2, Masayuki Watanabe3, Hideo Baba4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, calculated from serum albumin and total cholesterol concentrations and total lymphocyte count, is reportedly valuable for nutritional assessment. This study investigated whether CONUT score was predictive of outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients undergoing surgical resection.
METHODS: Preoperative CONUT scores were retrospectively evaluated in 417 CRC patients who underwent potentially curative resection at Kumamoto University Hospital from March 2005 to August 2014. Patients were divided into four groups based on preoperative CONUT scores: normal, light, moderate, and severe. The associations of CONUT score with clinicopathological factors, patient survival, and postoperative complications were examined.
RESULTS: CONUT score correlated significantly with age (P < 0.001), body mass index (P = 0.005), carcinoembryonic antigen (P = 0.002), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (P = 0.005) concentrations. Overall survival (OS) rate was significantly lower in patients with moderate/severe than light or normal CONUT scores. CONUT score was independently prognostic of OS [moderate/severe vs. normal, hazard ratio = 5.92, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.30-14.92; P < 0.001)]. Patients with moderate/severe CONUT scores were at greater risk for complications, especially for severe complications. Multivariate analysis showed that CONUT score was independently predictive of severe complications (moderate/severe vs. normal, odds ratio = 4.51, 95 % CI 1.89-10.74; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: CONUT score may predict survival and postoperative severe complications in CRC patients undergoing potentially curative resection. Management of CRC patients may need consideration of host nutritional status.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CONUT; Colorectal cancer; Overall survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27726014     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-016-2668-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  31 in total

1.  Are pretreatment serum albumin and cholesterol levels prognostic tools in patients with colorectal carcinoma?

Authors:  Omer Cengiz; Belma Kocer; Süleyman Sürmeli; Mary-Jo Santicky; Atilla Soran
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2006-05-29

2.  The nutritional index 'CONUT' is useful for predicting long-term prognosis of patients with end-stage liver diseases.

Authors:  Koji Fukushima; Yoshiyuki Ueno; Naoki Kawagishi; Yasuteru Kondo; Jun Inoue; Eiji Kakazu; Masashi Ninomiya; Yuta Wakui; Naoko Saito; Susumu Satomi; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  CA 19-9 as a marker in addition to CEA to monitor colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jolanda Stiksma; Diana C Grootendorst; Peter Willem G van der Linden
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 4.481

4.  Evaluation of CONUT for Clinical Malnutrition Detection and Short-Term Prognostic Assessment in Hospitalized Elderly People.

Authors:  M Cabré; C Ferreiro; M Arus; M Roca; E Palomera; M Serra-Prat
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  Why do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies?

Authors:  H J Andreyev; A R Norman; J Oates; D Cunningham
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Prognostic significance of Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D Gupta; C A Lammersfeld; P G Vashi; J Burrows; C G Lis; J F Grutsch
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Co-culture of primary rat hepatocytes with rat liver epithelial cells enhances interleukin-6-induced acute-phase protein response.

Authors:  Stephan J A C Peters; Tamara Vanhaecke; Peggy Papeleu; Vera Rogiers; Henk P Haagsman; Klaske van Norren
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 5.249

8.  Elevated preoperative CEA is associated with worse survival in stage I-III rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  I Tarantino; R Warschkow; M Worni; K Merati-Kashani; D Köberle; B M Schmied; S A Müller; T Steffen; T Cerny; U Güller
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Impact of the Preoperative Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score on the Survival after Curative Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yasuhito Iseki; Masatsune Shibutani; Kiyoshi Maeda; Hisashi Nagahara; Hiroshi Ohtani; Kenji Sugano; Tetsuro Ikeya; Kazuya Muguruma; Hiroaki Tanaka; Takahiro Toyokawa; Katsunobu Sakurai; Kosei Hirakawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Statin use after colorectal cancer diagnosis and survival: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Chris R Cardwell; Blanaid M Hicks; Carmel Hughes; Liam J Murray
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  33 in total

1.  Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score-based nomogram to predict overall survival of patients with HBV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy.

Authors:  Z-X Lin; D-Y Ruan; C-C Jia; T-T Wang; J-T Cheng; H-Q Huang; X-Y Wu
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Preoperative malnutrition and prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by subsequent esophagectomy.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Yoshifumi Baba; Hideo Baba
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score as a prognostic factor for obstructive colorectal cancer patients received stenting as a bridge to curative surgery.

Authors:  Ryuichiro Sato; Masaya Oikawa; Tetsuya Kakita; Takaho Okada; Tomoya Abe; Takashi Yazawa; Haruyuki Tsuchiya; Naoya Akazawa; Masaki Sato; Tetsuya Ohira; Yoshihiro Harada; Haruka Okano; Kei Ito; Takashi Tsuchiya
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Prognostic significance of controlling nutritional status score-based nomogram for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria after radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Feng Ye; Yujing Xin; Yanan Wang; Xiao Li; Duiping Feng; Yi Chen; Xiang Zhou
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-10

5.  The Prognostic Impact of Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Following Curative Hepatectomy: A Retrospective Single Institution Study.

Authors:  Tatsunori Miyata; Yo-Ichi Yamashita; Takaaki Higashi; Katsunobu Taki; Daisuke Izumi; Keisuke Kosumi; Ryuma Tokunaga; Shigeki Nakagawa; Hirohisa Okabe; Katsunori Imai; Daisuke Hashimoto; Akira Chikamoto; Hideo Baba
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  The Preoperative Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index Predicts Postoperative Complications in Elderly Patients with Gastric Cancer Undergoing Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Syuhei Kushiyama; Katsunobu Sakurai; Naoshi Kubo; Yutaka Tamamori; Takafumi Nishii; Akiko Tachimori; Toru Inoue; Kiyoshi Maeda
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Prognostic Value of Combined Tumor Marker and Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Manabu Yamamoto; Hiroaki Saito; Chihiro Uejima; Akimitsu Tanio; Yoichiro Tada; Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Teruhisa Sakamoto; Soichiro Honjo; Keigo Ashida; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 1.641

8.  Postoperative Serum Albumin is a Potential Prognostic Factor for Older Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Saito; Yusuke Kono; Yuki Murakami; Yuji Shishido; Hirohiko Kuroda; Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Yoji Fukumoto; Tomohiro Osaki; Keigo Ashida; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 1.641

9.  Prognostic impact of controlling nutritional status score in resected lung squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Gouji Toyokawa; Yuka Kozuma; Taichi Matsubara; Naoki Haratake; Shinkichi Takamori; Takaki Akamine; Kazuki Takada; Masakazu Katsura; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Fumihiro Shoji; Tatsuro Okamoto; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Prognostic Impact of Preoperative Naples Prognostic Score in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery.

Authors:  Jianping Xiong; Haitao Hu; Wenzhe Kang; Hao Liu; Fuhai Ma; Shuai Ma; Yang Li; Peng Jin; Yantao Tian
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.