Literature DB >> 29221266

Prognostic impact of controlling nutritional status score in resected lung squamous cell carcinoma.

Gouji Toyokawa1, Yuka Kozuma1, Taichi Matsubara1, Naoki Haratake1, Shinkichi Takamori1, Takaki Akamine1, Kazuki Takada1, Masakazu Katsura1, Mototsugu Shimokawa2, Fumihiro Shoji1, Tatsuro Okamoto1, Yoshihiko Maehara1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The preoperative immune-nutritional status has been shown to predict the postoperative prognosis in various types of cancer; however, the prognostic significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in resected lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has yet to be elucidated.
METHODS: A total of 108 patients with resected lung SCC were analyzed for their clinicopathological factors, including the CONUT score, which can be calculated from the serum albumin, total cholesterol, and total peripheral lymphocyte count. The patients were divided into two groups: CONUT low (0 or 1) or high (≥2).
RESULTS: Among 108 patients, 76 (70.4%) were CONUT low, while 32 (29.6%) were CONUT high. No significant association between the CONUT score and the clinicopathological factors was found. Patients with CONUT high exhibited significantly shorter disease-free and overall survivals (DFS and OS) than those with CONUT low (P=0.016 and P=0.006, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed that the CONUT score [hazard ratio (HR): 1.902, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.045-3.373, P=0.036], age (HR: 2.286, 95% CI: 1.246-4.304, P=0.007), pathological stage (HR: 2.527, 95% CI: 1.391-4.644, P=0.002), and lymphatic invasion (HR: 2.321, 95% CI: 1.110-4.493, P=0.027) were independent prognostic factors for the DFS. Furthermore, in a multivariate analysis, the CONUT score (HR: 1.909, 95% CI: 0.902-3.860, P=0.081), age (HR: 2.455, 95% CI: 1.208-5.178, P=0.013), pathological stage (HR: 2.488, 95% CI: 1.201-5.306, P=0.014), and lymphatic invasion (HR: 3.409, 95% CI: 1.532-7.240, P=0.004) were shown to be independent prognostic factors for the OS.
CONCLUSIONS: The current study showed that the CONUT score was an independent prognostic factor for the DFS and OS in patients with resected lung SCC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC); controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score; postoperative prognosis; surgical resection

Year:  2017        PMID: 29221266      PMCID: PMC5708442          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.07.108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  22 in total

1.  CONUT: a tool for controlling nutritional status. First validation in a hospital population.

Authors:  J Ignacio de Ulíbarri; A González-Madroño; N G P de Villar; P González; B González; A Mancha; F Rodríguez; G Fernández
Journal:  Nutr Hosp       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.057

2.  Are pretreatment serum albumin and cholesterol levels prognostic tools in patients with colorectal carcinoma?

Authors:  Omer Cengiz; Belma Kocer; Süleyman Sürmeli; Mary-Jo Santicky; Atilla Soran
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2006-05-29

Review 3.  Nutritional screening; control of clinical undernutrition with analytical parameters.

Authors:  José Ignacio de Ulíbarri Pérez; Guillermo Fernández; Francisco Rodríguez Salvanés; Ana María Díaz López
Journal:  Nutr Hosp       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 1.057

4.  Pre-therapeutic nutritional assessment for predicting severe adverse events in patients with head and neck cancer treated by radiotherapy.

Authors:  Takeyuki Kono; Koji Sakamoto; Seiichi Shinden; Kaoru Ogawa
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 7.324

5.  The neutrophil to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratios as biomarkers for lung cancer development.

Authors:  Pablo Sanchez-Salcedo; Juan P de-Torres; Diego Martinez-Urbistondo; Jessica Gonzalez-Gutierrez; Juan Berto; Arantzazu Campo; Ana B Alcaide; Javier J Zulueta
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 5.705

6.  CONUT: a novel independent predictive score for colorectal cancer patients undergoing potentially curative resection.

Authors:  Ryuma Tokunaga; Yasuo Sakamoto; Shigeki Nakagawa; Mayuko Ohuchi; Daisuke Izumi; Keisuke Kosumi; Katsunobu Taki; Takaaki Higashi; Yuji Miyamoto; Naoya Yoshida; Eiji Oki; Masayuki Watanabe; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Severe Complications, Recurrence, and Poor Prognosis in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Primary Tumor Resection.

Authors:  Ryuma Tokunaga; Yasuo Sakamoto; Shigeki Nakagawa; Yuji Miyamoto; Naoya Yoshida; Eiji Oki; Masayuki Watanabe; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Preoperative neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and prognostic nutritional index predict survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Shimizu; Riki Okita; Shinsuke Saisho; Ai Maeda; Yuji Nojima; Masao Nakata
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Impact of the Preoperative Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score on the Survival after Curative Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yasuhito Iseki; Masatsune Shibutani; Kiyoshi Maeda; Hisashi Nagahara; Hiroshi Ohtani; Kenji Sugano; Tetsuro Ikeya; Kazuya Muguruma; Hiroaki Tanaka; Takahiro Toyokawa; Katsunobu Sakurai; Kosei Hirakawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Low Prognostic Nutritional Index Correlates with Worse Survival in Patients with Advanced NSCLC following EGFR-TKIs.

Authors:  Jin Sheng; Yun-Peng Yang; Yu-Xiang Ma; Tao Qin; Zhi-Huang Hu; Shao-Dong Hong; Ting Zhou; Yan Huang; Hong-Yun Zhao; Li Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  Use of preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a better prognostic marker for distal cholangiocarcinoma after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Fumihiro Terasaki; Teiichi Sugiura; Yukiyasu Okamura; Takaaki Ito; Yusuke Yamamoto; Ryo Ashida; Katsuhisa Ohgi; Katsuhiko Uesaka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  The prognostic value of the controlling nutritional status score in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Jin Qian; Jing Wang; Feng Cheng; Hong-Feng Guo; Jun Xia; Xin Zhou
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.359

3.  The relationship between nutritional status and prognosis in patients with locally advanced and advanced stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Busra Gul; Selma Metintas; Guntulu Ak; Senay Yilmaz; Muzaffer Metintas
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  A novel prognostic marker in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: musculo-immuno-nutritional score calculated by controlling nutritional status and creatine kinase.

Authors:  Shinkichi Takamori; Gouji Toyokawa; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Fumihiko Kinoshita; Yuka Kozuma; Taichi Matsubara; Naoki Haratake; Takaki Akamine; Fumihiko Hirai; Tetsuzo Tagawa; Yoshinao Oda; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a prognostic factor in patients with resected breast cancer.

Authors:  Wen Li; Min Li; Ting Wang; Guangzhi Ma; Yunfu Deng; Dan Pu; Zhenkun Liu; Qiang Wu; Xuejuan Liu; Qinghua Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Prognostic impact of the Controlling Nutritional Status score in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with pembrolizumab.

Authors:  Taro Ohba; Shinkichi Takamori; Ryo Toyozawa; Kaname Nosaki; Yasuhiro Umeyama; Naoki Haratake; Naoko Miura; Masafumi Yamaguchi; Kenichi Taguchi; Takashi Seto; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Mitsuhiro Takenoyama
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Prognostic impact of the pre-treatment controlling nutritional status score in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Peng; Yan Hao; Bihua Rao; Yunxia Cao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Validation of Different Nutritional Assessment Tools in Predicting Prognosis of Patients with Soft Tissue Spindle-Cell Sarcomas.

Authors:  Hiromi Sasaki; Satoshi Nagano; Setsuro Komiya; Noboru Taniguchi; Takao Setoguchi
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Validation of the preoperative controlling nutritional status score as an independent predictor in a large Chinese cohort of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Hang Xu; Ping Tan; Xi Jin; Jianzhong Ai; Tianhai Lin; Haoran Lei; Lu Yang; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  A risk score system based on DNA methylation levels and a nomogram survival model for lung squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ming Zhang; Libing Sun; Yi Ru; Shasha Zhang; Junjun Miao; Pengda Guo; Jinghuan Lv; Feng Guo; Biao Liu
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.101

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.