Literature DB >> 27722526

New insights into the pretargeting approach to image and treat tumours.

Malay Patra1, Kristof Zarschler2, Hans-Jürgen Pietzsch2, Holger Stephan2, Gilles Gasser1.   

Abstract

Tumour pretargeting is a promising strategy for cancer diagnosis and therapy allowing for the rational use of long circulating, highly specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for both non-invasive cancer radioimmunodetection (RID) and radioimmunotherapy (RIT). In contrast to conventional RID/RIT where the radionuclides and oncotropic vector molecules are delivered as presynthesised radioimmunoconjugates, the pretargeting approach is a multistep procedure that temporarily separates targeting of certain tumour-associated antigens from delivery of diagnostic or therapeutic radionuclides. In principle, unlabelled, highly tumour antigen specific mAb conjugates are, in a first step, administered into a patient. After injection, sufficient time is allowed for blood circulation, accumulation at the tumour site and subsequent elimination of excess mAb conjugates from the body. The small fast-clearing radiolabelled effector molecules with a complementary functionality directed to the prelocalised mAb conjugates are then administered in a second step. Due to its fast pharmacokinetics, the small effector molecules reach the malignant tissue quickly and bind the local mAb conjugates. Thereby, corresponding radioimmunoconjugates are formed in vivo and, consequently, radiation doses are deposited mainly locally. This procedure results in a much higher tumour/non-tumour (T/NT) ratio and is favourable for cancer diagnosis and therapy as it substantially minimises the radiation damage to non-tumour cells of healthy tissues. The pretargeting approach utilises specific non-covalent interactions (e.g. strept(avidin)/biotin) or covalent bond formations (e.g. inverse electron demand Diels-Alder reaction) between the tumour bound antibody and radiolabelled small molecules. This tutorial review descriptively presents this complex strategy, addresses the historical as well as recent preclinical and clinical advances and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of different available variations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27722526     DOI: 10.1039/c5cs00784d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Soc Rev        ISSN: 0306-0012            Impact factor:   54.564


  24 in total

1.  Accelerated Blood Clearance of Antibodies by Nanosized Click Antidotes.

Authors:  Weston J Smith; Guankui Wang; Hanmant Gaikwad; Vivian P Vu; Ernest Groman; David W A Bourne; Dmitri Simberg
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  Design and preclinical evaluation of nanostars for the passive pretargeting of tumor tissue.

Authors:  Jeroen A C M Goos; Maria Davydova; Thomas R Dilling; Andrew Cho; Mike A Cornejo; Abhishek Gupta; William S Price; Simon Puttick; Michael R Whittaker; John F Quinn; Thomas P Davis; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Bespoke Pretargeted Nanoradioimmunotherapy for the Treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Kin Man Au; Ashutosh Tripathy; Carolina Pe-I Lin; Kyle Wagner; Seungpyo Hong; Andrew Z Wang; Steven I Park
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 15.881

4.  Pretargeted delivery of PEG-coated drug carriers to breast tumors using multivalent, bispecific antibody against polyethylene glycol and HER2.

Authors:  Christina L Parker; Morgan D McSweeney; Andrew T Lucas; Timothy M Jacobs; Daniel Wadsworth; William C Zamboni; Samuel K Lai
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 5.  Recent Advances in the Development of Tetrazine Ligation Tools for Pretargeted Nuclear Imaging.

Authors:  Rocío García-Vázquez; Umberto Maria Battisti; Matthias M Herth
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30

6.  Enhanced Tumor Diagnostic and Therapeutic Effect of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle-Mediated Pre-targeted Strategy.

Authors:  Gaochao Lv; Ke Li; Ling Qiu; Ying Peng; Xueyu Zhao; Xi Li; Qingzhu Liu; Shanshan Wang; Jianguo Lin
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  ImmunoPET: Concept, Design, and Applications.

Authors:  Weijun Wei; Zachary T Rosenkrans; Jianjun Liu; Gang Huang; Quan-Yong Luo; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  29th Annual GP2A Medicinal Chemistry Conference.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Helesbeux; Laura Carro; Florence O McCarthy; Vânia M Moreira; Francesca Giuntini; Niamh O'Boyle; Susan E Matthews; Gülşah Bayraktar; Samuel Bertrand; Christophe Rochais; Pascal Marchand
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07

Review 9.  Synthetic mimics of biotin/(strept)avidin.

Authors:  Wenqi Liu; Soumen K Samanta; Bradley D Smith; Lyle Isaacs
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 54.564

10.  Why bother with alpha particles?

Authors:  A Paden King; Frank I Lin; Freddy E Escorcia
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.