Numerical modeling has emerged over the last several decades as a widely accepted tool for investigations in environmental sciences. In estuarine research, hydrodynamic and ecological models have moved along parallel tracks with regard to complexity, refinement, computational power, and incorporation of uncertainty. Coupled hydrodynamic-ecological models have been used to assess ecosystem processes and interactions, simulate future scenarios, and evaluate remedial actions in response to eutrophication, habitat loss, and freshwater diversion. The need to couple hydrodynamic and ecological models to address research and management questions is clear, because dynamic feedbacks between biotic and physical processes are critical interactions within ecosystems. In this review we present historical and modern perspectives on estuarine hydrodynamic and ecological modeling, consider model limitations, and address aspects of model linkage, skill assessment, and complexity. We discuss the balance between spatial and temporal resolution and present examples using different spatiotemporal scales. Finally, we recommend future lines of inquiry, approaches to balance complexity and uncertainty, and model transparency and utility. It is idealistic to think we can pursue a "theory of everything" for estuarine models, but recent advances suggest that models for both scientific investigations and management applications will continue to improve in terms of realism, precision, and accuracy.
Numerical modeling has emerged over the last several decades as a widely accepted tool for investigations in environmental sciences. In estuarine research, hydrodynamic and ecological models have moved along parallel tracks with regard to complexity, refinement, computational power, and incorporation of uncertainty. Coupled hydrodynamic-ecological models have been used to assess ecosystem processes and interactions, n>an class="Chemical">simulate future scenarios, and evaluate remedial actions in response to eutrophication, habitat loss, and freshwater diversion. The need to couple hydrodynamic and ecological models to address research and management questions is clear, because dynamic feedbacks between biotic and physical processes are critical interactions within ecosystems. In this review we present historical and modern perspectives on estuarine hydrodynamic and ecological modeling, consider model limitations, and address aspects of model linkage, skill assessment, and complexity. We discuss the balance between spatial and temporal resolution and present examples using different spatiotemporal scales. Finally, we recommend future lines of inquiry, approaches to balance complexity and uncertainty, and model transparency and utility. It is idealistic to think we can pursue a "theory of everything" for estuarine models, but recent advances suggest that models for both scientific investigations and management applications will continue to improve in terms of realism, precision, and accuracy.
Authors: Matthew R Evans; Volker Grimm; Karin Johst; Tarja Knuuttila; Rogier de Langhe; Catherine M Lessells; Martina Merz; Maureen A O'Malley; Steve H Orzack; Michael Weisberg; Darren J Wilkinson; Olaf Wolkenhauer; Tim G Benton Journal: Trends Ecol Evol Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 17.712
Authors: Raleigh R Hood; Gary W Shenk; Rachel L Dixon; Sean M C Smith; William P Ball; Jesse O Bash; Rich Batiuk; Kathy Boomer; Damian C Brady; Carl Cerco; Peter Claggett; Kim de Mutsert; Zachary M Easton; Andrew J Elmore; Marjorie A M Friedrichs; Lora A Harris; Thomas F Ihde; Iara Lacher; Li Li; Lewis C Linker; Andrew Miller; Julia Moriarty; Gregory B Noe; George Onyullo; Kenneth Rose; Katie Skalak; Richard Tian; Tamie L Veith; Lisa Wainger; Donald Weller; Yinglong Joseph Zhang Journal: Ecol Modell Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 3.512
Authors: Karim Alizad; Scott C Hagen; Stephen C Medeiros; Matthew V Bilskie; James T Morris; Len Balthis; Christine A Buckel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Afshin Shabani; Sean A Woznicki; Megan Mehaffey; Jonathan Butcher; Tim A Wool; Pai-Yei Whung Journal: J Flood Risk Manag Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 4.005