Literature DB >> 27721675

Progress and challenges in coupled hydrodynamic-ecological estuarine modeling.

Neil K Ganju1, Mark J Brush2, Brenda Rashleigh3, Alfredo L Aretxabaleta1, Pilar Del Barrio4, Jason S Grear3, Lora A Harris5, Samuel J Lake2, Grant McCardell6, James O'Donnell6, David K Ralston7, Richard P Signell1, Jeremy M Testa5, Jamie M P Vaudrey6.   

Abstract

Numerical modeling has emerged over the last several decades as a widely accepted tool for investigations in environmental sciences. In estuarine research, hydrodynamic and ecological models have moved along parallel tracks with regard to complexity, refinement, computational power, and incorporation of uncertainty. Coupled hydrodynamic-ecological models have been used to assess ecosystem processes and interactions, simulate future scenarios, and evaluate remedial actions in response to eutrophication, habitat loss, and freshwater diversion. The need to couple hydrodynamic and ecological models to address research and management questions is clear, because dynamic feedbacks between biotic and physical processes are critical interactions within ecosystems. In this review we present historical and modern perspectives on estuarine hydrodynamic and ecological modeling, consider model limitations, and address aspects of model linkage, skill assessment, and complexity. We discuss the balance between spatial and temporal resolution and present examples using different spatiotemporal scales. Finally, we recommend future lines of inquiry, approaches to balance complexity and uncertainty, and model transparency and utility. It is idealistic to think we can pursue a "theory of everything" for estuarine models, but recent advances suggest that models for both scientific investigations and management applications will continue to improve in terms of realism, precision, and accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ecological modeling; ecosystem modeling; hydrodynamics; numerical modeling; skill assessment

Year:  2015        PMID: 27721675      PMCID: PMC5053394          DOI: 10.1007/s12237-015-0011-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Estuaries Coast        ISSN: 1559-2723            Impact factor:   2.976


  13 in total

Review 1.  Nutrients in estuaries--an overview and the potential impacts of climate change.

Authors:  Peter J Statham
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Predicting summer hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico: redux.

Authors:  R E Turner; N N Rabalais; D Justić
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Management options and effects on a marine ecosystem: assessing the future of the Baltic.

Authors:  Fredrik Wulff; Oleg P Savchuk; Alexander Sokolov; Christoph Humborg; Carl-Magnus Mörth
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Do simple models lead to generality in ecology?

Authors:  Matthew R Evans; Volker Grimm; Karin Johst; Tarja Knuuttila; Rogier de Langhe; Catherine M Lessells; Martina Merz; Maureen A O'Malley; Steve H Orzack; Michael Weisberg; Darren J Wilkinson; Olaf Wolkenhauer; Tim G Benton
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  A scenario and forecast model for Gulf of Mexico hypoxic area and volume.

Authors:  Donald Scavia; Mary Anne Evans; Daniel R Obenour
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 6.  Anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria: unique microorganisms with exceptional properties.

Authors:  Laura van Niftrik; Mike S M Jetten
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 11.056

7.  Predicting summer hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico: riverine N, P, and Si loading.

Authors:  R E Turner; N N Rabalais; D Justic
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 5.553

8.  Assessing biophysical controls on Gulf of Mexico hypoxia through probabilistic modeling.

Authors:  Daniel R Obenour; Anna M Michalak; Donald Scavia
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.657

9.  Source and Delivery of Nutrients to Receiving Waters in the Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic Regions of the United States.

Authors:  Richard B Moore; Craig M Johnston; Richard A Smith; Bryan Milstead
Journal:  J Am Water Resour Assoc       Date:  2011-10

10.  Carbon use efficiency of microbial communities: stoichiometry, methodology and modelling.

Authors:  Robert L Sinsabaugh; Stefano Manzoni; Daryl L Moorhead; Andreas Richter
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 9.492

View more
  4 in total

1.  Parameter sensitivity and identifiability for a biogeochemical model of hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico.

Authors:  Marcus W Beck; John C Lehrter; Lisa L Lowe; Brandon M Jarvis
Journal:  Ecol Modell       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.974

2.  The Chesapeake Bay Program Modeling System: Overview and Recommendations for Future Development.

Authors:  Raleigh R Hood; Gary W Shenk; Rachel L Dixon; Sean M C Smith; William P Ball; Jesse O Bash; Rich Batiuk; Kathy Boomer; Damian C Brady; Carl Cerco; Peter Claggett; Kim de Mutsert; Zachary M Easton; Andrew J Elmore; Marjorie A M Friedrichs; Lora A Harris; Thomas F Ihde; Iara Lacher; Li Li; Lewis C Linker; Andrew Miller; Julia Moriarty; Gregory B Noe; George Onyullo; Kenneth Rose; Katie Skalak; Richard Tian; Tamie L Veith; Lisa Wainger; Donald Weller; Yinglong Joseph Zhang
Journal:  Ecol Modell       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.512

3.  Dynamic responses and implications to coastal wetlands and the surrounding regions under sea level rise.

Authors:  Karim Alizad; Scott C Hagen; Stephen C Medeiros; Matthew V Bilskie; James T Morris; Len Balthis; Christine A Buckel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A coupled hydrodynamic (HEC-RAS 2D) and water quality model (WASP) for simulating flood-induced soil, sediment, and contaminant transport.

Authors:  Afshin Shabani; Sean A Woznicki; Megan Mehaffey; Jonathan Butcher; Tim A Wool; Pai-Yei Whung
Journal:  J Flood Risk Manag       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.005

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.