Literature DB >> 27721010

3D is not enough: Building up a cell instructive microenvironment for tumoral stroma microtissues.

Virginia Brancato1, Alessandro Garziano1, Filomena Gioiella1, Francesco Urciuolo2, Giorgia Imparato3, Valeria Panzetta3, Sabato Fusco3, Paolo A Netti4.   

Abstract

We fabricated three-dimensional microtissues with the aim to replicate in vitro the composition and the functionalities of the tumor microenvironment. By arranging either normal fibroblasts (NF) or cancer-activated fibroblasts (CAF) in two different three dimensional (3D) configurations, two kinds of micromodules were produced: spheroids and microtissues. Spheroids were obtained by means of the traditional cell aggregation technique resulting in a 3D model characterized by high cell density and low amount of extracellular proteins. The microtissues were obtained by culturing cells into porous gelatin microscaffolds. In this latter configuration, cells assembled an intricate network of collagen, fibronectin and hyaluronic acid. We investigated the biophysical properties of both 3D models in terms of cell growth, metabolic activity, texture and composition of the extracellular matrix (via histological analysis and multiphoton imaging) and cell mechanical properties (via Particle Tracking Microrheology). In the spheroid models such biophysical properties remained unchanged regardless to the cell type used. In contrast, normal-microtissues and cancer-activated-microtissues displayed marked differences. CAF-microtissues possessed higher proliferation rate, superior contraction capability, different micro-rheological properties and an extracellular matrix richer in collagen fibronectin and hyaluronic acid. At last, multiphoton investigation revealed differences in the collagen network architecture. Taken together, these results suggested that despite to cell spheroids, microtissues better recapitulate the important differences existing in vivo between normal and cancer-activated stroma representing a more suitable system to mimic in vitro the stromal element of the tumor tissues. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This work concerns the engineering of tumor tissue in vitro. Tumor models serve as biological equivalent to study pathologic progression and to screen or validate the drugs efficacy. Tumor tissue is composed by malignant cells surviving in a microenvironment, or stroma. Stroma plays a pivotal role in cancer progression. Current in vitro models, i.e. spheroids, can't replicate the phenomena related to the tumor stroma remodeling. For this reason, to better replicate the tumor physiology in vitro that include functional and morphological changes, a novel 3D cancer model is proposed.
Copyright © 2016 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracellular matrix; Spheroids; Stromal microtissues; TOC; Tumor microenvironment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27721010     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  9 in total

Review 1.  Addressing Patient Specificity in the Engineering of Tumor Models.

Authors:  Laura J Bray; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Nathalie Bock
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-09-12

2.  Three dimensional engineered models to study hypoxia biology in breast cancer.

Authors:  Vaishali Aggarwal; Oshin Miranda; Paul A Johnston; Shilpa Sant
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 8.679

3.  Breast Cancer Reconstruction: Design Criteria for a Humanized Microphysiological System.

Authors:  Trivia Frazier; Christopher Williams; Michael Henderson; Tamika Duplessis; Emma Rogers; Xiying Wu; Katie Hamel; Elizabeth C Martin; Omair Mohiuddin; Shahensha Shaik; Ram Devireddy; Brian G Rowan; Daniel J Hayes; Jeffrey M Gimble
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  In Vitro Cancer Models: A Closer Look at Limitations on Translation.

Authors:  Nina Antunes; Banani Kundu; Subhas C Kundu; Rui L Reis; Vítor Correlo
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07

5.  Breast Fibroblasts and ECM Components Modulate Breast Cancer Cell Migration Through the Secretion of MMPs in a 3D Microfluidic Co-Culture Model.

Authors:  Karina M Lugo-Cintrón; Max M Gong; José M Ayuso; Lucas A Tomko; David J Beebe; María Virumbrales-Muñoz; Suzanne M Ponik
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Enhanced growth and differentiation of myoblast cells grown on E-jet 3D printed platforms.

Authors:  Haoxiang Chen; Juchang Zhong; Jian Wang; Ruiying Huang; Xiaoyin Qiao; Honghui Wang; Zhikai Tan
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-02-04

Review 7.  3D Cell Cultures as Prospective Models to Study Extracellular Vesicles in Cancer.

Authors:  Guillermo Bordanaba-Florit; Iratxe Madarieta; Beatriz Olalde; Juan M Falcón-Pérez; Félix Royo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Modeling Endothelialized Hepatic Tumor Microtissues for Drug Screening.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Ranjith Kumar Kankala; Jianting Zhang; Liuzhi Hao; Kai Zhu; Shibin Wang; Yu Shrike Zhang; Aizheng Chen
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 16.806

Review 9.  Organ on Chip Technology to Model Cancer Growth and Metastasis.

Authors:  Giorgia Imparato; Francesco Urciuolo; Paolo Antonio Netti
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.