Literature DB >> 33528293

Breast Cancer Reconstruction: Design Criteria for a Humanized Microphysiological System.

Trivia Frazier1, Christopher Williams2, Michael Henderson1, Tamika Duplessis3, Emma Rogers1, Xiying Wu1, Katie Hamel1,4, Elizabeth C Martin4, Omair Mohiuddin5, Shahensha Shaik6, Ram Devireddy7, Brian G Rowan8, Daniel J Hayes9, Jeffrey M Gimble1.   

Abstract

International regulatory agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration have mandated that the scientific community develop humanized microphysiological systems (MPS) as an in vitro alternative to animal models in the near future. While the breast cancer research community has long appreciated the importance of three-dimensional growth dynamics in their experimental models, there are remaining obstacles preventing a full conversion to humanized MPS for drug discovery and pathophysiological studies. This perspective evaluates the current status of human tissue-derived cells and scaffolds as building blocks for an "idealized" breast cancer MPS based on bioengineering design principles. It considers the utility of adipose tissue as a potential source of endothelial, lymphohematopoietic, and stromal cells for the support of breast cancer epithelial cells. The relative merits of potential MPS scaffolds derived from adipose tissue, blood components, and synthetic biomaterials is evaluated relative to the current "gold standard" material, Matrigel, a murine chondrosarcoma-derived basement membrane-enriched hydrogel. The advantages and limitations of a humanized breast cancer MPS are discussed in the context of in-process and destructive read-out assays. Impact statement Regulatory authorities have highlighted microphysiological systems as an emerging tool in breast cancer research. This has been led by calls for more predictive human models and reduced animal experimentation. This perspective describes how human-derived cells, extracellular matrices, and hydrogels will provide the building blocks to create breast cancer models that accurately reflect diversity at multiple levels, that is, patient ethnicity, pathophysiology, and metabolic status.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Food and Drug Administration; adipose-derived stromal/stem cells; breast cancer; microphysiological system; three-dimensional cell culture

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33528293      PMCID: PMC8196546          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  108 in total

Review 1.  Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro.

Authors:  Linda G Griffith; Melody A Swartz
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Simplifying the extracellular matrix for 3-D cell culture and tissue engineering: a pragmatic approach.

Authors:  Glenn D Prestwich
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.429

3.  Tumor grafts derived from women with breast cancer authentically reflect tumor pathology, growth, metastasis and disease outcomes.

Authors:  Yoko S DeRose; Guoying Wang; Yi-Chun Lin; Philip S Bernard; Saundra S Buys; Mark T W Ebbert; Rachel Factor; Cindy Matsen; Brett A Milash; Edward Nelson; Leigh Neumayer; R Lor Randall; Inge J Stijleman; Bryan E Welm; Alana L Welm
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-10-23       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels Formed in Situ by Transglutaminase-Catalyzed Reaction.

Authors:  Adrian Ranga; Matthias P Lutolf; Jöns Hilborn; Dmitri A Ossipov
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 6.988

Review 5.  Human Adipose Tissue Derivatives as a Potent Native Biomaterial for Tissue Regenerative Therapies.

Authors:  Siva Sankari Sharath; Janarthanan Ramu; Shantikumar Vasudevan Nair; Subramaniya Iyer; Ullas Mony; Jayakumar Rangasamy
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 6.  Modeling the tumor extracellular matrix: Tissue engineering tools repurposed towards new frontiers in cancer biology.

Authors:  Bartley J Gill; Jennifer L West
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  3D breast cancer microtissue reveals the role of tumor microenvironment on the transport and efficacy of free-doxorubicin in vitro.

Authors:  Virginia Brancato; Filomena Gioiella; Giorgia Imparato; Daniela Guarnieri; Francesco Urciuolo; Paolo A Netti
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Human Adipose Derived Cells in Two- and Three-Dimensional Cultures: Functional Validation of an In Vitro Fat Construct.

Authors:  Robert Bender; Michelle McCarthy; Theodore Brown; Joanna Bukowska; Stanley Smith; Rosalyn D Abbott; David L Kaplan; Christopher Williams; James W Wade; Andrea Alarcon; Xiying Wu; Frank Lau; Jeffrey M Gimble; Trivia Frazier
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.443

9.  Drug resistance profiling of a new triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft model.

Authors:  Margarite D Matossian; Hope E Burks; Steven Elliott; Van T Hoang; Annie C Bowles; Rachel A Sabol; Bahia Wahba; Muralidharan Anbalagan; Brian Rowan; Mohamed E Abazeed; Bruce A Bunnell; Krzysztof Moroz; Lucio Miele; Lyndsay V Rhodes; Steven D Jones; Elizabeth C Martin; Bridgette M Collins-Burow; Matthew E Burow
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink.

Authors:  Falguni Pati; Jinah Jang; Dong-Heon Ha; Sung Won Kim; Jong-Won Rhie; Jin-Hyung Shim; Deok-Ho Kim; Dong-Woo Cho
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.