Literature DB >> 31572718

Addressing Patient Specificity in the Engineering of Tumor Models.

Laura J Bray1,2,3, Dietmar W Hutmacher1,2,3,4,5, Nathalie Bock2,3,4.   

Abstract

Cancer treatment is challenged by the heterogeneous nature of cancer, where prognosis depends on tumor type and disease stage, as well as previous treatments. Optimal patient stratification is critical for the development and validation of effective treatments, yet pre-clinical model systems are lacking in the delivery of effective individualized platforms that reflect distinct patient-specific clinical situations. Advances in cancer cell biology, biofabrication, and microengineering technologies have led to the development of more complex in vitro three-dimensional (3D) models to act as drug testing platforms and to elucidate novel cancer mechanisms. Mostly, these strategies have enabled researchers to account for the tumor microenvironment context including tumor-stroma interactions, a key factor of heterogeneity that affects both progression and therapeutic resistance. This is aided by state-of-the-art biomaterials and tissue engineering technologies, coupled with reproducible and high-throughput platforms that enable modeling of relevant physical and chemical factors. Yet, the translation of these models and technologies has been impaired by neglecting to incorporate patient-derived cells or tissues, and largely focusing on immortalized cell lines instead, contributing to drug failure rates. While this is a necessary step to establish and validate new models, a paradigm shift is needed to enable the systematic inclusion of patient-derived materials in the design and use of such models. In this review, we first present an overview of the components responsible for heterogeneity in different tumor microenvironments. Next, we introduce the state-of-the-art of current in vitro 3D cancer models employing patient-derived materials in traditional scaffold-free approaches, followed by novel bioengineered scaffold-based approaches, and further supported by dynamic systems such as bioreactors, microfluidics, and tumor-on-a-chip devices. We critically discuss the challenges and clinical prospects of models that have succeeded in providing clinical relevance and impact, and present emerging concepts of novel cancer model systems that are addressing patient specificity, the next frontier to be tackled by the field.
Copyright © 2019 Bray, Hutmacher and Bock.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D tumor models; hydrogels; microfluidics; patient-derived; primary cells; tissue engineering; tumor heterogeneity; tumor microenvironment

Year:  2019        PMID: 31572718      PMCID: PMC6751285          DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol        ISSN: 2296-4185


  255 in total

Review 1.  Bringing 3D tumor models to the clinic - predictive value for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Kathrin Halfter; Barbara Mayer
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 2.  Immune checkpoint blockade: a common denominator approach to cancer therapy.

Authors:  Suzanne L Topalian; Charles G Drake; Drew M Pardoll
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 31.743

3.  Chip-based human liver-intestine and liver-skin co-cultures--A first step toward systemic repeated dose substance testing in vitro.

Authors:  Ilka Maschmeyer; Tobias Hasenberg; Annika Jaenicke; Marcus Lindner; Alexandra Katharina Lorenz; Julie Zech; Leif-Alexander Garbe; Frank Sonntag; Patrick Hayden; Seyoum Ayehunie; Roland Lauster; Uwe Marx; Eva-Maria Materne
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 5.571

4.  Human breast cancer decellularized scaffolds promote epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions and stemness of breast cancer cells in vitro.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Biao Wang; Shubin Li; Qin Jin; Yanfeng Dai
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 6.384

5.  Organoid cultures derived from patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dong Gao; Ian Vela; Andrea Sboner; Phillip J Iaquinta; Wouter R Karthaus; Anuradha Gopalan; Catherine Dowling; Jackline N Wanjala; Eva A Undvall; Vivek K Arora; John Wongvipat; Myriam Kossai; Sinan Ramazanoglu; Luendreo P Barboza; Wei Di; Zhen Cao; Qi Fan Zhang; Inna Sirota; Leili Ran; Theresa Y MacDonald; Himisha Beltran; Juan-Miguel Mosquera; Karim A Touijer; Peter T Scardino; Vincent P Laudone; Kristen R Curtis; Dana E Rathkopf; Michael J Morris; Daniel C Danila; Susan F Slovin; Stephen B Solomon; James A Eastham; Ping Chi; Brett Carver; Mark A Rubin; Howard I Scher; Hans Clevers; Charles L Sawyers; Yu Chen
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Computational modelling suggests complex interactions between interstitial flow and tumour angiogenesis.

Authors:  Guillermo Vilanova; Miguel Burés; Ignasi Colominas; Hector Gomez
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Human brain metastatic stroma attracts breast cancer cells via chemokines CXCL16 and CXCL12.

Authors:  Brile Chung; Ali A Esmaeili; Sailesh Gopalakrishna-Pillai; John P Murad; Emily S Andersen; Naveen Kumar Reddy; Gayathri Srinivasan; Brian Armstrong; Caleb Chu; Young Kim; Tommy Tong; James Waisman; John H Yim; Behnam Badie; Peter P Lee
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-03-02

8.  Microfluidic Biopsy Trapping Device for the Real-Time Monitoring of Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Angela Babetski Holton; Francy L Sinatra; Jenny Kreahling; Amy J Conway; David A Landis; Soner Altiok
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Application of 3-D Microfluidic Models for Studying Mass Transport Properties of the Tumor Interstitial Matrix.

Authors:  Alex Avendano; Marcos Cortes-Medina; Jonathan W Song
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-01-23

10.  Guided chemotherapy based on patient-derived mini-xenograft models improves survival of gallbladder carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Ming Zhan; Rui-Meng Yang; Hui Wang; Min He; Wei Chen; Sun-Wang Xu; Lin-Hua Yang; Qiang Liu; Man-Mei Long; Jian Wang
Journal:  Cancer Commun (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-17
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The extracellular matrix of hematopoietic stem cell niches.

Authors:  Cornelia Lee-Thedieck; Peter Schertl; Gerd Klein
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  A2B adenosine receptor antagonists rescue lymphocyte activity in adenosine-producing patient-derived cancer models.

Authors:  Apple Hui Min Tay; Rubén Prieto-Díaz; Shiyong Neo; Le Tong; Xinsong Chen; Valentina Carannante; Björn Önfelt; Johan Hartman; Felix Haglund; Maria Majellaro; Jhonny Azuaje; Xerardo Garcia-Mera; Jose M Brea; Maria I Loza; Willem Jespers; Hugo Gutierrez-de-Teran; Eddy Sotelo; Andreas Lundqvist
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 12.469

Review 3.  Microfluidic technologies for immunotherapy studies on solid tumours.

Authors:  K Paterson; S Zanivan; R Glasspool; S B Coffelt; M Zagnoni
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Stroma-Rich Co-Culture Multicellular Tumor Spheroids as a Tool for Photoactive Drugs Screening.

Authors:  Ilya Yakavets; Samuel Jenard; Aurelie Francois; Yulia Maklygina; Victor Loschenov; Henri-Pierre Lassalle; Gilles Dolivet; Lina Bezdetnaya
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  Hydrogels as Drug Delivery Systems: A Review of Current Characterization and Evaluation Techniques.

Authors:  Margaux Vigata; Christoph Meinert; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Nathalie Bock
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 6.  3D Models as a Tool to Assess the Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Therapeutic Antibodies: Advantages and Limitations.

Authors:  Virginia Guzzeloni; Lorenzo Veschini; Federica Pedica; Elisabetta Ferrero; Marina Ferrarini
Journal:  Antibodies (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-08

7.  Decellularization of xenografted tumors provides cell-specific in vitro 3D environment.

Authors:  Gaia Iazzolino; Unai Mendibil; Blanca Arnaiz; Ane Ruiz-de-Angulo; Mikel Azkargorta; Kepa B Uribe; Neda Khatami; Felix Elortza; Beatriz Olalde; Vanessa Gomez-Vallejo; Jordi Llop; Ander Abarrategi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 8.  In vitro breast cancer models for studying mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapy.

Authors:  Gary J Cheng; Euphemia Y Leung; Dean C Singleton
Journal:  Explor Target Antitumor Ther       Date:  2022-06-01

9.  Development of a Multicellular 3D Tumor Model to Study Cellular Heterogeneity and Plasticity in NSCLC Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Leena Arora; Moyna Kalia; Suman Dasgupta; Navneet Singh; Anita K Verma; Durba Pal
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.738

10.  Inverting angiogenesis with interstitial flow and chemokine matrix-binding affinity.

Authors:  Adrian Moure; Guillermo Vilanova; Hector Gomez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.