Literature DB >> 27720564

Correlation between lymph node count and survival and a reappraisal of lymph node ratio as a predictor of survival in gastric cancer: A multi-institutional cohort study.

J H Lee1, J-W Kang2, B-H Nam3, G S Cho4, W J Hyung5, M C Kim6, H-J Lee7, K W Ryu8, S W Ryu9, D W Shin10, C-Y Kim11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the correlation between lymph node count (LNC) and survival and to evaluate whether lymph node ratio (LNR) which is related to LNC is a better predictor of survival for gastric cancer than the N category of UICC/AJCC through a multi-institutional cohort study.
METHODS: The study cohort included 3284 patients from eight institutions. Lower and upper quartiles of LNC were used for comparisons. The cut-off values (0, 0.06, 0.27, and 0.49) for the LNR categories were based on Classification and Regression Trees techniques. Akaike information criteria (AIC) for Cox regression models was used to evaluate goodness of fit between competing predictor variables (LNR vs. N category).
RESULTS: The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rates of lower and upper quartiles of LNC were 82.2% and 84.8%. In the subgroup analysis of pN category, the upper quartile of LNC showed better survival than the lower quartile in pN2, pN3a, and pN3b subgroups. Regarding LNR, 5-year DSS of LNR 0, 0-0.06, 0.06-0.27, 0.27-0.49, and >0.49 was 95.3%, 88.7%, 70.6%, 42.7%, and 17.2% respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that pT, pN, LNR, residual tumor status, distant metastasis, and tumor differentiation significantly affected survival. The analysis also confirmed superiority of LNR compared with N category in the AIC analysis.
CONCLUSION: Higher LNC correlated with better survival in patients with pN2, pN3a, and pN3b gastric cancer. Our data indicate that LNR is a better predictor of survival than N category of UICC/AJCC.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lymph nodes; Stomach neoplasm; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27720564     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  10 in total

1.  The association of the lymph node ratio and serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 with early recurrence after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Sawayama; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Daisuke Kuroda; Tasuku Toihata; Tomoyuki Uchihara; Yuki Koga; Taisuke Yagi; Yuki Kiyozumi; Tsugio Eto; Yukiharu Hiyoshi; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Yoshifumi Baba; Yuji Miyamoto; Naoya Yoshida; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Effectiveness and safety of robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of 12,401 gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Tao Jin; Han-Dong Liu; Kun Yang; Ze-Hua Chen; Yue-Xin Zhang; Jian-Kun Hu
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-10-16

3.  Prognostic performance of different lymph node classification systems in young gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yi-Ru Chen; Mei-Qian Wang; Yi-Ting Li; Ping Li; Su-Shan Ouyang; Hui-Wen Xu; Sen-Lin Zhu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-08

4.  Prognostic Value of the Number of Lymph Nodes Examined in Patients with Node-Negative Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Ze-Long Yang; Ming-Hua Zhu; Quan Shi; Fu-Min Lu; Chun-Xi Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Effect of Surgical Approach on Node Harvest in Gastrectomy: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Michael D Watson; Sally Trufan; Jennifer H Benbow; Nicole L Gower; Joshua S Hill; Jonathan C Salo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer based on propensity score matching: short-term outcomes at a high-capacity center.

Authors:  Shan-Ping Ye; Jun Shi; Dong-Ning Liu; Qun-Guang Jiang; Xiong Lei; Bo Tang; Peng-Hui He; Wei-Quan Zhu; He-Chun Tang; Tai-Yuan Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A homogenized approach to classify advanced gastric cancer patients with limited and adequate number of pathologically examined lymph nodes.

Authors:  Sharvesh Raj Seeruttun; Lipu Xu; Fangwei Wang; Xiaodong Yi; Cheng Fang; Zhimin Liu; Wei Wang; Zhiwei Zhou
Journal:  Cancer Commun (Lond)       Date:  2019-06-10

8.  Comparison of a Tumor-Ratio-Metastasis Staging System and the 8th AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Miaoquan Zhang; Chao Ding; Lin Xu; Biyi Ou; Shoucheng Feng; Guoqiang Wang; Wei Wang; Yao Liang; Yingbo Chen; Zhiwei Zhou; Haibo Qiu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Analysis of survival and prognosis of 298 gastric adenocarcinoma patients with no distant metastasis.

Authors:  Luguang Liu; Hongbo Hao; Lijuan Zhao; Junxia Hu; Baocai Si
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Nomograms combined with SERPINE1-related module genes predict overall and recurrence-free survival after curative resection of gastric cancer: a study based on TCGA and GEO data.

Authors:  Xing-Chuan Li; Song Wang; Jia-Rui Zhu; Yu-Ping Wang; Yong-Ning Zhou
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.