Literature DB >> 34532088

Prognostic performance of different lymph node classification systems in young gastric cancer.

Yi-Ru Chen1, Mei-Qian Wang1, Yi-Ting Li2, Ping Li1, Su-Shan Ouyang1, Hui-Wen Xu1, Sen-Lin Zhu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate staging plays a pivotal role in cancer care. The lymph node (LN) ratio (LNR) and the log odds of positive LNs (LODDS) have been suggested as alternatives to the N staging since the TNM system has the risk of stage migration. The prognostic significance of LNR and LODDS in young patients with gastric cancer (GC) has not been reported. This study aims to investigate the correlations between LNR and LODDS and survival of young patients with GC, and compare the predictive performance of these LN staging methods.
METHODS: GC patients before the age of 40 from 2004 to 2016 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database were enrolled. The prognostic evaluation of the N factor, LNR and LODDS was compared using the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, area under the curve (AUC), C-index and Akaike information criterion (AIC).
RESULTS: Multivariate survival analysis identified that the LNR and LODDS were significantly independent prognostic indicators for overall survival (OS) in young patients with GC and in the subgroups comprised of patients with ≤15 LNs examined. The time-dependent ROC curves of the LNR and LODDS were continuously superior to that of the N factor in predicting OS during the observation period. And the AUCs revealed that the predictive accuracy of the LNR and LODDS was remarkably superior to the N factor at 1 and 3 years (P<0.05). The model incorporating LNR or LODDS had higher C-index and lower AIC when comparing to the model incorporating the N factor.
CONCLUSIONS: The LNR and LODDS improve accuracy of survival risk prediction in young patients with GC when comparing to the N factor. These two novel LN classification methods should be considered as alternatives to the N staging for the prognostic prediction of young patients with GC. 2021 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Young patients; gastric cancer (GC); log odds of positive lymph nodes; lymph node ratio (LNR); prognosis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34532088      PMCID: PMC8421864          DOI: 10.21037/jgo-21-185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  55 in total

1.  Ratio-based staging systems are better than the 7th and 8th editions of the TNM in stratifying the prognosis of gastric cancer patients: A multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Annamaria Agnes; Alberto Biondi; Ferdinando M Cananzi; Stefano Rausei; Rossella Reddavid; Vito Laterza; Federica Galli; Vittorio Quagliuolo; Maurizio Degiuli; Domenico D'Ugo; Roberto Persiani
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of gastric cancer patients aged 40 years or younger.

Authors:  Feng-Jen Hsieh; Yu-Chao Wang; Jun-Te Hsu; Keng-Hao Liu; Chun-Nan Yeh
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Proposal of a new stage grouping of gastric cancer for TNM classification: International Gastric Cancer Association staging project.

Authors:  Takeshi Sano; Daniel G Coit; Hyung Ho Kim; Franco Roviello; Paulo Kassab; Christian Wittekind; Yuko Yamamoto; Yasuo Ohashi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Gastric adenocarcinoma in young patients: a population-based appraisal.

Authors:  Waddah B Al-Refaie; Chung-Yuan Hu; Peter W T Pisters; George J Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Cancer incidence and mortality among young adults aged 20-39 years worldwide in 2012: a population-based study.

Authors:  Miranda M Fidler; Sumit Gupta; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Jacques Ferlay; Eva Steliarova-Foucher; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Surgical/pathologic-stage migration confounds comparisons of gastric cancer survival rates between Japan and Western countries.

Authors:  A M Bunt; J Hermans; V T Smit; C J van de Velde; G J Fleuren; J A Bruijn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer.

Authors:  David Cunningham; William H Allum; Sally P Stenning; Jeremy N Thompson; Cornelis J H Van de Velde; Marianne Nicolson; J Howard Scarffe; Fiona J Lofts; Stephen J Falk; Timothy J Iveson; David B Smith; Ruth E Langley; Monica Verma; Simon Weeden; Yu Jo Chua
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Increasing survival gap between young and elderly gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  S D Nelen; R H A Verhoeven; V E P P Lemmens; J H W de Wilt; K Bosscha
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  The new TNM classification of lymph node metastasis minimises stage migration problems in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  G de Manzoni; G Verlato; F Roviello; P Morgagni; A Di Leo; L Saragoni; D Marrelli; H Kurihara; F Pasini
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Clinical characteristics of young-age onset gastric cancer in Korea.

Authors:  Jieun Lee; Myung Ah Lee; In-Ho Kim; Sang-Young Roh
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Four Lymph Node Staging Systems in Gastric Adenocarcinoma after Neoadjuvant Therapy - A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Hongkun Lai; Jiabin Zheng; Yong Li
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  Does lymph node ratio (metastasis/total lymph node count) affect survival and prognosis in gastric cancer?

Authors:  Ramazan Topcu; İbrahim T Şahiner; Murat Kendirci; Murathan Erkent; İsmail Sezikli; Mehmet B Tutan
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.422

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.