David Carrera1, Bruce C V Campbell2, Jordi Cortés3, Montse Gorchs4, Marisol Querol4, Xavier Jiménez4, Mònica Millán1, Antoni Dávalos1, Natalia Pérez de la Ossa5. 1. Stroke Unit, Neuroscience Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain. 2. Department of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 3. Department of Statistics and Operations Research, UPC, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Emergency Medical Services, Catalonia, Spain. 5. Stroke Unit, Neuroscience Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: natperezossa@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prehospital clinical scales to identify patients with acute stroke with a large vessel occlusion (LVO) and direct them to an endovascular-capable stroke center are needed. We evaluated whether simplification of the Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation (RACE) scale, a 5-item scale previously validated in the field, could maintain its high performance to identify patients with LVO. METHODS: Using the original prospective validation cohort of the RACE scale, 7 simpler versions of the RACE scale were designed and retrospectively recalculated for each patient. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and proximal LVO were evaluated in hospital. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to test performance of the simplified versions to identify LVO. For each version, the threshold with sensitivity closest to the original scale (85%) was used, and the variation in specificity and correct classification were assessed. RESULTS: The study included 341 patients with suspected stroke; 20% had LVO. The 7 simpler versions of the RACE scale had slightly lower area under the curve for detecting LVO because of lower specificity at the chosen sensitivity level. Correct classification rate decreased 9% if facial palsy was simplified or if eye or gaze deviation was removed, and decreased 4.5% if the aphasia or agnosia cortical sign was removed. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the original RACE scale for prehospital assessment of patients with suspected stroke for its ease of use and its high performance to predict the presence of a LVO. The use of simplified versions would reduce its predictive value.
BACKGROUND: Prehospital clinical scales to identify patients with acute stroke with a large vessel occlusion (LVO) and direct them to an endovascular-capable stroke center are needed. We evaluated whether simplification of the Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation (RACE) scale, a 5-item scale previously validated in the field, could maintain its high performance to identify patients with LVO. METHODS: Using the original prospective validation cohort of the RACE scale, 7 simpler versions of the RACE scale were designed and retrospectively recalculated for each patient. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and proximal LVO were evaluated in hospital. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to test performance of the simplified versions to identify LVO. For each version, the threshold with sensitivity closest to the original scale (85%) was used, and the variation in specificity and correct classification were assessed. RESULTS: The study included 341 patients with suspected stroke; 20% had LVO. The 7 simpler versions of the RACE scale had slightly lower area under the curve for detecting LVO because of lower specificity at the chosen sensitivity level. Correct classification rate decreased 9% if facial palsy was simplified or if eye or gaze deviation was removed, and decreased 4.5% if the aphasia or agnosia cortical sign was removed. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the original RACE scale for prehospital assessment of patients with suspected stroke for its ease of use and its high performance to predict the presence of a LVO. The use of simplified versions would reduce its predictive value.
Authors: Christopher T Richards; Baiyang Wang; Eddie Markul; Frank Albarran; Doreen Rottman; Neelum T Aggarwal; Patricia Lindeman; Leslee Stein-Spencer; Joseph M Weber; Kenneth S Pearlman; Katie L Tataris; Jane L Holl; Diego Klabjan; Shyam Prabhakaran Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Christopher T Richards; Ryan Huebinger; Katie L Tataris; Joseph M Weber; Laura Eggers; Eddie Markul; Leslee Stein-Spencer; Kenneth S Pearlman; Jane L Holl; Shyam Prabhakaran Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Kessarin Panichpisal; Sarah Erpenbeck; Paul Vilar; Reji P Babygirija; Maharaj Singh; M Riccardo Colella; Richard A Rovin Journal: J Patient Cent Res Rev Date: 2022-04-18
Authors: Kevin S Attenhofer; Lovella Hailey; Melissa Mortin; Karen S Rapp; Kunal Agrawal; Branko Huisa-Garate; Royya Modir; Dawn M Meyer; Thomas M Hemmen; Brett C Meyer Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Stefanie Behnke; Thomas Schlechtriemen; Andreas Binder; Monika Bachhuber; Mark Becker; Benedikt Trauth; Martin Lesmeister; Elmar Spüntrup; Silke Walter; Lukas Hoor; Andreas Ragoschke-Schumm; Fatma Merzou; Luca Tarantini; Thomas Bertsch; Jürgen Guldner; Achim Magull-Seltenreich; Frank Maier; Christoph Massing; Volkmar Fischer; Michael Gawlitza; Katrin Donnevert; Hans-Michael Lamberty; Stefan Jung; Matthias Strittmatter; Silke Tonner; Johannes Schuler; Robert Liszka; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Iris Q Grunwald; Wolfgang Reith; Klaus Fassbender Journal: Neurol Res Pract Date: 2021-06-01
Authors: Mohammad El-Ghanem; Francisco E Gomez; Prateeka Koul; Rolla Nuoman; Justin G Santarelli; Krishna Amuluru; Chirag D Gandhi; Eric R Cohen; Philip Meyers; Fawaz Al-Mufti Journal: Interv Neurol Date: 2018-12-13
Authors: Martin Cabal; Linda Machova; Daniel Vaclavik; Petr Jasso; David Holes; Ondrej Volny; Michal Bar Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 4.003