OBJECTIVES: Identifying stroke during a 9-1-1 call is critical to timely prehospital care. However, emergency medical dispatchers (EMDs) recognize stroke in less than half of 9-1-1 calls, potentially due to the words used by callers to communicate stroke signs and symptoms. We hypothesized that callers do not typically use words and phrases considered to be classical descriptors of stroke, such as focal neurologic deficits, but that a mixed-methods approach can identify words and phrases commonly used by 9-1-1 callers to describe acute stroke victims. METHODS: We performed a mixed-method, retrospective study of 9-1-1 call audio recordings for adult patients with confirmed stroke who were transported by ambulance in a large urban city. Content analysis, a qualitative methodology, and computational linguistics, a quantitative methodology, were used to identify key words and phrases used by 9-1-1 callers to describe acute stroke victims. Because a caller's level of emotional distress contributes to the communication during a 9-1-1 call, the Emotional Content and Cooperation Score was scored by a multidisciplinary team. RESULTS: A total of 110 9-1-1 calls, received between June and September 2013, were analyzed. EMDs recognized stroke in 48% of calls, and the emotional state of most callers (95%) was calm. In 77% of calls in which EMDs recognized stroke, callers specifically used the word "stroke"; however, the word "stroke" was used in only 38% of calls. Vague, non-specific words and phrases were used to describe stroke victims' symptoms in 55% of calls, and 45% of callers used distractor words and phrases suggestive of non-stroke emergencies. Focal neurologic symptoms were described in 39% of calls. Computational linguistics identified 9 key words that were more commonly used in calls where the EMD identified stroke. These words were concordant with terms identified through qualitative content analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Most 9-1-1 callers used vague, non-specific, or distractor words and phrases and infrequently provide classic stroke descriptions during 9-1-1 calls for stroke. Both qualitative and quantitative methodologies identified similar key words and phrases associated with accurate EMD stroke recognition. This study suggests that tools incorporating commonly used words and phrases could potentially improve EMD stroke recognition.
OBJECTIVES: Identifying stroke during a 9-1-1 call is critical to timely prehospital care. However, emergency medical dispatchers (EMDs) recognize stroke in less than half of 9-1-1 calls, potentially due to the words used by callers to communicate stroke signs and symptoms. We hypothesized that callers do not typically use words and phrases considered to be classical descriptors of stroke, such as focal neurologic deficits, but that a mixed-methods approach can identify words and phrases commonly used by 9-1-1 callers to describe acute stroke victims. METHODS: We performed a mixed-method, retrospective study of 9-1-1 call audio recordings for adult patients with confirmed stroke who were transported by ambulance in a large urban city. Content analysis, a qualitative methodology, and computational linguistics, a quantitative methodology, were used to identify key words and phrases used by 9-1-1 callers to describe acute stroke victims. Because a caller's level of emotional distress contributes to the communication during a 9-1-1 call, the Emotional Content and Cooperation Score was scored by a multidisciplinary team. RESULTS: A total of 110 9-1-1 calls, received between June and September 2013, were analyzed. EMDs recognized stroke in 48% of calls, and the emotional state of most callers (95%) was calm. In 77% of calls in which EMDs recognized stroke, callers specifically used the word "stroke"; however, the word "stroke" was used in only 38% of calls. Vague, non-specific words and phrases were used to describe stroke victims' symptoms in 55% of calls, and 45% of callers used distractor words and phrases suggestive of non-stroke emergencies. Focal neurologic symptoms were described in 39% of calls. Computational linguistics identified 9 key words that were more commonly used in calls where the EMD identified stroke. These words were concordant with terms identified through qualitative content analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Most 9-1-1 callers used vague, non-specific, or distractor words and phrases and infrequently provide classic stroke descriptions during 9-1-1 calls for stroke. Both qualitative and quantitative methodologies identified similar key words and phrases associated with accurate EMD stroke recognition. This study suggests that tools incorporating commonly used words and phrases could potentially improve EMD stroke recognition.
Entities:
Keywords:
emergency medical dispatch; emergency medical service communication systems; emergency medical services; prehospital care; stroke
Authors: Joon-Tae Kim; Pil-Wook Chung; Sidney Starkman; Nerses Sanossian; Samuel J Stratton; Marc Eckstein; Frank D Pratt; Robin Conwit; David S Liebeskind; Latisha Sharma; Lucas Restrepo; May-Kim Tenser; Miguel Valdes-Sueiras; Jeffrey Gornbein; Scott Hamilton; Jeffrey L Saver Journal: Stroke Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Russell Cerejo; Seby John; Andrew B Buletko; Ather Taqui; Ahmed Itrat; Natalie Organek; Sung-Min Cho; Lila Sheikhi; Ken Uchino; Farren Briggs; Andrew P Reimer; Stacey Winners; Gabor Toth; Peter Rasmussen; Muhammad S Hussain Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Martin Ebinger; Benjamin Winter; Matthias Wendt; Joachim E Weber; Carolin Waldschmidt; Michal Rozanski; Alexander Kunz; Peter Koch; Philipp A Kellner; Daniel Gierhake; Kersten Villringer; Jochen B Fiebach; Ulrike Grittner; Andreas Hartmann; Bruno-Marcel Mackert; Matthias Endres; Heinrich J Audebert Journal: JAMA Date: 2014 Apr 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michael E Abboud; Roger Band; Judy Jia; William Pajerowski; Guy David; Michelle Guo; C Crawford Mechem; Steven R Messé; Brendan G Carr; Michael T Mullen Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Denisse Sequeira; Christian Martin-Gill; Matthew R Kesinger; Laura R Thompson; Tudor G Jovin; Lori M Massaro; Francis X Guyette Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Mayank Goyal; Bijoy K Menon; Wim H van Zwam; Diederik W J Dippel; Peter J Mitchell; Andrew M Demchuk; Antoni Dávalos; Charles B L M Majoie; Aad van der Lugt; Maria A de Miquel; Geoffrey A Donnan; Yvo B W E M Roos; Alain Bonafe; Reza Jahan; Hans-Christoph Diener; Lucie A van den Berg; Elad I Levy; Olvert A Berkhemer; Vitor M Pereira; Jeremy Rempel; Mònica Millán; Stephen M Davis; Daniel Roy; John Thornton; Luis San Román; Marc Ribó; Debbie Beumer; Bruce Stouch; Scott Brown; Bruce C V Campbell; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Jeffrey L Saver; Michael D Hill; Tudor G Jovin Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Prasanthi Ramanujam; Edward Castillo; Ekta Patel; Gary Vilke; Michael P Wilson; James V Dunford Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2008-08-23 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: William J Powers; Colin P Derdeyn; José Biller; Christopher S Coffey; Brian L Hoh; Edward C Jauch; Karen C Johnston; S Claiborne Johnston; Alexander A Khalessi; Chelsea S Kidwell; James F Meschia; Bruce Ovbiagele; Dileep R Yavagal Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 10.170
Authors: Kuan-Chen Chin; Yu-Chia Cheng; Wen-Chu Chiang; Albert Y Chen; Jen-Tang Sun; Chih-Yen Ou; Chun-Hua Hu; Ming-Chi Tsai; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: A G Rudd; C Bladin; P Carli; D A De Silva; T S Field; E C Jauch; P Kudenchuk; M W Kurz; T Lærdal; Meh Ong; P Panagos; A Ranta; C Rutan; M R Sayre; L Schonau; S D Shin; D Waters; F Lippert Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2020-03-29 Impact factor: 5.266