Rakesh Khatri1, Anantha R Vellipuram2, Alberto Maud2, Salvador Cruz-Flores2, Gustavo J Rodriguez2. 1. Department of Neurology, Texas Tech University of Health Sciences Center, 4800 Alberta Avenue, El Paso, TX, 79905, USA. rakesh.khatri@ttuhsc.edu. 2. Department of Neurology, Texas Tech University of Health Sciences Center, 4800 Alberta Avenue, El Paso, TX, 79905, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The review provides an overview of current endovascular management of patients with acute ischemic stroke in the light of recent landmark trials proving unequivocal benefit of the intervention. RECENT FINDINGS: Several randomized trials looking at selective groups of patients presenting after an acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation demonstrated an overwhelming benefit of the endovascular treatment compared to intravenous thrombolysis, leading to expedited changes in the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines. Nonetheless, there are a relative large number of patients that were not included in those trials that might still benefit from endovascular treatment (acute posterior circulation-related strokes or acute embolic occlusion of middle cerebral artery beyond the main trunk for instances) and in which further studies are needed. We also briefly discuss endovascular techniques, post-procedure care, and endovascular treatment delivery models to expedite stroke patient assessment and rapid transport using updated and improved workflow protocols to provide timely recanalization. Endovascular treatment of acute occlusion of a proximal large artery in the anterior circulation is currently the standard of care. Time and quality of recanalization are the most important variables that determine the outcome. The indication for endovascular therapy in different scenarios (acute embolic occlusion in the posterior circulation or more distal branch occlusions) has to be individualized according to each patient's particular characteristics until new evidence is provided.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The review provides an overview of current endovascular management of patients with acute ischemic stroke in the light of recent landmark trials proving unequivocal benefit of the intervention. RECENT FINDINGS: Several randomized trials looking at selective groups of patients presenting after an acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation demonstrated an overwhelming benefit of the endovascular treatment compared to intravenous thrombolysis, leading to expedited changes in the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines. Nonetheless, there are a relative large number of patients that were not included in those trials that might still benefit from endovascular treatment (acute posterior circulation-related strokes or acute embolic occlusion of middle cerebral artery beyond the main trunk for instances) and in which further studies are needed. We also briefly discuss endovascular techniques, post-procedure care, and endovascular treatment delivery models to expedite strokepatient assessment and rapid transport using updated and improved workflow protocols to provide timely recanalization. Endovascular treatment of acute occlusion of a proximal large artery in the anterior circulation is currently the standard of care. Time and quality of recanalization are the most important variables that determine the outcome. The indication for endovascular therapy in different scenarios (acute embolic occlusion in the posterior circulation or more distal branch occlusions) has to be individualized according to each patient's particular characteristics until new evidence is provided.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ischemic stroke; Large vessel occlusion; Post-procedure care; Stent retrievers; Tandem occlusion; Wake-up stroke
Authors: Jeffrey L Saver; Mayank Goyal; Alain Bonafe; Hans-Christoph Diener; Elad I Levy; Vitor M Pereira; Gregory W Albers; Christophe Cognard; David J Cohen; Werner Hacke; Olav Jansen; Tudor G Jovin; Heinrich P Mattle; Raul G Nogueira; Adnan H Siddiqui; Dileep R Yavagal; Blaise W Baxter; Thomas G Devlin; Demetrius K Lopes; Vivek K Reddy; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Oliver C Singer; Reza Jahan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Arturo Renú; Sergio Amaro; Carlos Laredo; Luis San Román; Laura Llull; Antonio Lopez; Xabier Urra; Jordi Blasco; Laura Oleaga; Ángel Chamorro Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Chelsea S Kidwell; Reza Jahan; Jeffrey Gornbein; Jeffry R Alger; Val Nenov; Zahra Ajani; Lei Feng; Brett C Meyer; Scott Olson; Lee H Schwamm; Albert J Yoo; Randolph S Marshall; Philip M Meyers; Dileep R Yavagal; Max Wintermark; Judy Guzy; Sidney Starkman; Jeffrey L Saver Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ricardo Costa; João Pinho; José Nuno Alves; José Manuel Amorim; Manuel Ribeiro; Carla Ferreira Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2015-11-27 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: William J Powers; Colin P Derdeyn; José Biller; Christopher S Coffey; Brian L Hoh; Edward C Jauch; Karen C Johnston; S Claiborne Johnston; Alexander A Khalessi; Chelsea S Kidwell; James F Meschia; Bruce Ovbiagele; Dileep R Yavagal Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 10.170