Literature DB >> 27717161

The problem Of muscle hypertrophy: Revisited.

Samuel L Buckner1, Scott J Dankel1, Kevin T Mattocks1, Matthew B Jessee1, J Grant Mouser1, Brittany R Counts1, Jeremy P Loenneke1.   

Abstract

In this paper we revisit a topic originally discussed in 1955, namely the lack of direct evidence that muscle hypertrophy from exercise plays an important role in increasing strength. To this day, long-term adaptations in strength are thought to be primarily contingent on changes in muscle size. Given this assumption, there has been considerable attention placed on programs designed to allow for maximization of both muscle size and strength. However, the conclusion that a change in muscle size affects a change in strength is surprisingly based on little evidence. We suggest that these changes may be completely separate phenomena based on: (1) the weak correlation between the change in muscle size and the change in muscle strength after training; (2) the loss of muscle mass with detraining, yet a maintenance of muscle strength; and (3) the similar muscle growth between low-load and high-load resistance training, yet divergent results in strength. Muscle Nerve 54: 1012-1014, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; dissociation; muscle growth; resistance training; strength

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27717161     DOI: 10.1002/mus.25420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  16 in total

1.  Exercise-Induced Myofibrillar Hypertrophy is a Contributory Cause of Gains in Muscle Strength.

Authors:  Christopher B Taber; Andrew Vigotsky; Greg Nuckols; Cody T Haun
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Patterns of responses and time-course of changes in muscle size and strength during low-load blood flow restriction resistance training in women.

Authors:  Ethan C Hill; Terry J Housh; Joshua L Keller; Cory M Smith; John V Anders; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson; Joel T Cramer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Muscle size and strength: debunking the "completely separate phenomena" suggestion.

Authors:  Thomas G Balshaw; Garry J Massey; Thomas M Maden-Wilkinson; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Muscle size and strength: another study not designed to answer the question.

Authors:  Samuel L Buckner; Scott J Dankel; Kevin T Mattocks; Matthew B Jessee; J Grant Mouser; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Changes in agonist neural drive, hypertrophy and pre-training strength all contribute to the individual strength gains after resistance training.

Authors:  Thomas G Balshaw; Garry J Massey; Thomas M Maden-Wilkinson; Antonio J Morales-Artacho; Alexandra McKeown; Clare L Appleby; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Resistance training induced changes in strength and specific force at the fiber and whole muscle level: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Minsoo Kang; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  The Effects of Regular Cold-Water Immersion Use on Training-Induced Changes in Strength and Endurance Performance: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Elvis S Malta; Yago M Dutra; James R Broatch; David J Bishop; Alessandro M Zagatto
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Interpreting Adaptation to Concurrent Compared with Single-Mode Exercise Training: Some Methodological Considerations.

Authors:  Jackson J Fyfe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  The Importance of Muscular Strength: Training Considerations.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Sophia Nimphius; Christopher R Bellon; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Low-load blood flow restriction elicits greater concentric strength than non-blood flow restriction resistance training but similar isometric strength and muscle size.

Authors:  Ethan C Hill; Terry J Housh; Joshua L Keller; Cory M Smith; John V Anders; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson; Joel T Cramer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.