| Literature DB >> 27716043 |
Jiaojiao Niu1,2, Zhongwen Rang3, Chao Zhang3, Wu Chen3, Feng Tian4, Huaqun Yin5,6, Linjian Dai7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The interaction mechanism between crop and soil microbial communities is a key issue in both agriculture and soil ecology. However, how soil microbial communities respond to crop planting and ultimately affect crop health still remain unclear. In this research, we explored how soil microbial communities shifted during tobacco cultivation under different rotation systems (control, maize rotation, lily rotation and turnip rotation).Entities:
Keywords: Crop health; Illumina sequencing; Molecular ecological network; Soil microbial communities; Succession mechanism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27716043 PMCID: PMC5054579 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-016-0845-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) of 16r RNA gene sequencing data for all 80 samples. The values of DCA1 and DCA2 are percentages of total variations that can be attributed to the corresponding axis
Dissimilarity test of 16S rRNA gene sequencing data among four groups in fallow period and mature period respectively
| Sampling time | Group | Control | MR | LR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D |
| D |
| D |
| ||
| Fallow period | MR | 0.48 | <0.01 | ||||
| LR | 0.51 | <0.01 | 0.50 | <0.01 | |||
| TR | 0.52 | <0.01 | 0.50 | <0.01 | 0.54 | <0.01 | |
| Mature period | MR | 0.48 | <0.01 | ||||
| LR | 0.46 | <0.01 | 0.47 | <0.01 | |||
| TR | 0.46 | <0.01 | 0.47 | <0.01 | 0.47 | <0.01 | |
D bray-cutis distance, P significance level
Shannon diversity and Pielou evenness of soil microbial communities
| Index | Sampling time | Control | MR | LR | TR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shannon diversity | Fallow period | 6.42a | 6.36a | 6.26a | 6.43a |
| Mature period | 6.08a | 6.50b | 5.52c | 5.91ac | |
|
|
| 0.11 |
|
| |
| Pielou evenness | Fallow period | 0.83a | 0.81b | 0.82ab | 0.83a |
| Mature period | 0.81ab | 0.82a | 0.77c | 0.79b | |
|
|
| 0.23 |
|
|
Significant differences (p < 0.05) between two periods are indicated in bold. And significant (p < 0.05) differences among four groups are labeled with alphabet
Fig. 2Relative abundances of dominant phyla (a) and genera (b) of soil microbial communities in 8 groups. Correlations in abundance of microbial populations between 2 periods are indicated with r and p values. Significant differences (p < 0.05) among 4 groups are indicated with alphabet. Significant differences between 2 periods are labeled with * (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01)
Fig. 3Network interactions of the only OTUs of Gp4 and Pseudomonas in Control (a), MR (b), LR (c) and TR (d). Each node signifies an OTU which could correspond to a microbial population. Colors of the nodes indicate different major phylum. A blue line indicates a positive interaction between 2 individual nodes, while a red line indicates a negative interaction
Fig. 4Partial least squares path modeling (PLSPM) about correlations among soil properties, microbial communities, community diversity and tobacco bacterial wilt (a), as well as among soil properties, microbial communities of fallow period and tobacco mature period (b)