Literature DB >> 27714493

Improved pose and affinity predictions using different protocols tailored on the basis of data availability.

Philip Prathipati1, Chioko Nagao2, Shandar Ahmad2, Kenji Mizuguchi2.   

Abstract

The D3R 2015 grand drug design challenge provided a set of blinded challenges for evaluating the applicability of our protocols for pose and affinity prediction. In the present study, we report the application of two different strategies for the two D3R protein targets HSP90 and MAP4K4. HSP90 is a well-studied target system with numerous co-crystal structures and SAR data. Furthermore the D3R HSP90 test compounds showed high structural similarity to existing HSP90 inhibitors in BindingDB. Thus, we adopted an integrated docking and scoring approach involving a combination of both pharmacophoric and heavy atom similarity alignments, local minimization and quantitative structure activity relationships modeling, resulting in the reasonable prediction of pose [with the root mean square deviation (RMSD) values of 1.75 Å for mean pose 1, 1.417 Å for the mean best pose and 1.85 Å for the mean all poses] and affinity (ROC AUC = 0.702 at 7.5 pIC50 cut-off and R = 0.45 for 180 compounds). The second protein, MAP4K4, represents a novel system with limited SAR and co-crystal structure data and little structural similarity of the D3R MAP4K4 test compounds to known MAP4K4 ligands. For this system, we implemented an exhaustive pose and affinity prediction protocol involving docking and scoring using the PLANTS software which considers side chain flexibility together with protein-ligand fingerprints analysis assisting in pose prioritization. This protocol through fares poorly in pose prediction (with the RMSD values of 4.346 Å for mean pose 1, 4.69 Å for mean best pose and 4.75 Å for mean all poses) and produced reasonable affinity prediction (AUC = 0.728 at 7.5 pIC50 cut-off and R = 0.67 for 18 compounds, ranked 1st among 80 submissions).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data-optimal protocol; Docking; GLMNET; Kinetic stability; QSAR; Scoring; Thermodynamic stability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27714493     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9982-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  43 in total

1.  Structure-activity relationships in purine-based inhibitor binding to HSP90 isoforms.

Authors:  Lisa Wright; Xavier Barril; Brian Dymock; Louisa Sheridan; Allan Surgenor; Mandy Beswick; Martin Drysdale; Adam Collier; Andy Massey; Nick Davies; Alex Fink; Christophe Fromont; Wynne Aherne; Kathy Boxall; Swee Sharp; Paul Workman; Roderick E Hubbard
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2004-06

2.  Integration-mediated prediction enrichment of quantitative model for Hsp90 inhibitors as anti-cancer agents: 3D-QSAR study.

Authors:  Kuldeep K Roy; Supriya Singh; Anil K Saxena
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  Fragment-based identification and optimization of a class of potent pyrrolo[2,1-f][1,2,4]triazine MAP4K4 inhibitors.

Authors:  Lan Wang; Mark Stanley; Jason W Boggs; Terry D Crawford; Brandon J Bravo; Anthony M Giannetti; Seth F Harris; Steven R Magnuson; Jim Nonomiya; Stephen Schmidt; Ping Wu; Weilan Ye; Stephen E Gould; Lesley J Murray; Chudi O Ndubaku; Huifen Chen
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  A D3R prospective evaluation of machine learning for protein-ligand scoring.

Authors:  Jocelyn Sunseri; Matthew Ragoza; Jasmine Collins; David Ryan Koes
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

6.  Characterization of beta3-adrenergic receptor: determination of pharmacophore and 3D QSAR model for beta3 adrenergic receptor agonism.

Authors:  Philip Prathipati; Anil K Saxena
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  CSAR benchmark exercise 2011-2012: evaluation of results from docking and relative ranking of blinded congeneric series.

Authors:  Kelly L Damm-Ganamet; Richard D Smith; James B Dunbar; Jeanne A Stuckey; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  CSAR benchmark exercise of 2010: combined evaluation across all submitted scoring functions.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; James B Dunbar; Peter Man-Un Ung; Emilio X Esposito; Chao-Yie Yang; Shaomeng Wang; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Structural protein-ligand interaction fingerprints (SPLIF) for structure-based virtual screening: method and benchmark study.

Authors:  C Da; D Kireev
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  PyPLIF: Python-based Protein-Ligand Interaction Fingerprinting.

Authors:  Muhammad Radifar; Nunung Yuniarti; Enade Perdana Istyastono
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2013-03-19
View more
  1 in total

1.  Docking of small molecules to farnesoid X receptors using AutoDock Vina with the Convex-PL potential: lessons learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2.

Authors:  Maria Kadukova; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.