Literature DB >> 27714438

High mid-term revision rate after treatment of large, full-thickness cartilage lesions and OA in the patellofemoral joint using a large inlay resurfacing prosthesis: HemiCAP-Wave®.

Jens Ole Laursen1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The HemiCAP-Wave® implant for the patellofemoral resurfacing treatment of large cartilage lesions and osteoarthritis (OA) was introduced in 2009. The outcome of a prospective cohort study of 18 patients with large trochlea lesions or isolated OA treated with the HemiCAP-Wave® implant is presented with up to a 6-year survival rate, and hypothesised short-to mid-term reduced pain and improved function.
METHODS: Indication for treatment with the HemiCAP-Wave® implant was a symptomatic, large cartilage lesion in trochlea demonstrated by MRI or arthroscopy, which was ICRS grades 3-4 and larger than 4 cm2. Patients were followed for 2 years with American Knee Society Subjective outcome Scores (AKSS), pain scores and radiographic evaluations and for up to 6 years with complications and reoperations.
RESULTS: At the 1- and 2-year follow-up mean AKSS clinical score, the mean AKSS function score and mean pain score improved significantly. Within 6 years, 28 % of the implants were revised to arthroplasty due to the progression of cartilage lesions, osteoarthritis or increased knee pain.
CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated an improved short- to mid-term clinical outcome and reduced pain but high mid-term revision rate after patellofemoral inlay resurfacing using the HemiCAP-Wave® implant. Patellofemoral resurfacing implantation treatment with a large inlay prosthesis can offer temporary treatment for large isolated patellofemoral cartilage lesions or OA in younger patients with almost healthy cartilage in the other compartments who are not yet eligible for arthroplasty treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cartilage defects; Inlay resurfacing arthroplasty; Knee; Osteoarthritis; Patellofemoral joint replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27714438     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4352-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  23 in total

1.  Management of chondral injuries of the knee by osteochondral autogenous transfer (mosaicplasty).

Authors:  Moreno Morelli; Jun Nagamori; Anthony Miniaci
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Patellar prosthesis.

Authors:  D C MCKEEVER
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1955-10       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Results after microfracture of full-thickness chondral defects in different compartments in the knee.

Authors:  P C Kreuz; M R Steinwachs; C Erggelet; S J Krause; G Konrad; M Uhl; N Südkamp
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty influences tibiofemoral kinematics: the effect of patellar thickness.

Authors:  Hilde Vandenneucker; Luc Labey; Jan Victor; Jos Vander Sloten; Kaat Desloovere; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Clinical and economic consequences of the treatment gap in knee osteoarthritis management.

Authors:  Nicholas J London; Larry E Miller; Jon E Block
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 1.538

7.  Long-term results after microfracture treatment for full-thickness knee chondral lesions in athletes.

Authors:  Alberto Gobbi; Georgios Karnatzikos; Anup Kumar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The microfracture technique for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee. A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kai Mithoefer; Riley J Williams; Russell F Warren; Hollis G Potter; Christopher R Spock; Edward C Jones; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Robert G Marx
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Prospective evaluation of anatomic patellofemoral inlay resurfacing: clinical, radiographic, and sports-related results after 24 months.

Authors:  Andreas B Imhoff; Matthias J Feucht; Gebhart Meidinger; Philip B Schöttle; Matthias Cotic
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty: pros, cons, and design considerations.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  [Patellofemoral inlay implants-an innovation in patellofemoral joint arthroplasty?]

Authors:  Hannes Degenhardt; Andreas B Imhoff; Matthias J Feucht; Jonas Pogorzelski
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  The clinical outcome of the different HemiCAP and UniCAP knee implants: A systematic and comprehensive review.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Dimitrios Chytas; Fritz Thorey
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2018-06-14

3.  The cost-effectiveness of osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee.

Authors:  Hema Mistry; Andrew Metcalfe; Nick Smith; Emma Loveman; Jill Colquitt; Pamela Royle; Norman Waugh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Reliable improvements in participation in low-impact sports following implantation of a patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty at mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Jonas Pogorzelski; Marco-Christopher Rupp; Conrad Ketzer; Matthias Cotic; Patricia Lutz; Saskia Beeck; Andreas B Imhoff; Matthias J Feucht
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  HemiCAP Knee Implants: Mid- to Long-Term Results.

Authors:  Jens Ole Laursen; Christian Backer Mogensen; Helene Skjøt-Arkil
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Preoperative patellofemoral anatomy affects failure rate after isolated patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthias J Feucht; Patricia M Lutz; Conrad Ketzer; Marco C Rupp; Matthias Cotic; Andreas B Imhoff; Jonas Pogorzelski
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  The lack of retropatellar resurfacing at index surgery is significantly associated with failure in patients following patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty: a multi-center study of more than 260 patients.

Authors:  Andreas B Imhoff; Eva Bartsch; Christoph Becher; Peter Behrens; Gerrit Bode; Matthias Cotic; Theresa Diermeier; Holger Falk; Matthias J Feucht; Ulrich Haupt; Stefan Hinterwimmer; Johannes Holz; René Hutter; René Kaiser; Tobias Knoblauch; Wolfgang Nebelung; Philipp Niemeyer; Turlough O'Donnel; Geert Pagenstert; Thilo Patzer; Tim Rose; Marco C Rupp; Thomas Tischer; Arne J Venjakob; Stephan Vogt; Jonas Pogorzelski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 4.342

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.