Literature DB >> 27712716

Increasing Patient Involvement in Drug Development.

Maria M Lowe1, David A Blaser2, Lisa Cone, Steve Arcona3, John Ko3, Rahul Sasane3, Paul Wicks2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To ensure the creation of treatments that maximize value at the lowest cost, all aspects of the health care system need to align with patient needs and preferences. Despite growing efforts to engage patients in research and regulatory activities, the pharmaceutical industry has yet to maximize patient involvement in the drug development process.
OBJECTIVE: To gain a better understanding of the present state of patient involvement in drug development.
METHODS: Through a semistructured interview methodology, we sought to identify opportunities, barriers, and examples of patient involvement in the drug development process. Telephone interviews were conducted with six senior leaders of evidence generation within the pharmaceutical industry and four patients. These interviews were supplemented with interviews with a research funder, a regulator, a patient advocacy group, and a caregiver.
RESULTS: Although our interviewees spoke of the potential benefits of aligning research around the needs of patients, there were few examples they could share to suggest this was occurring at scale. A number of barriers were identified including the added burden associated with adverse event reporting, concerns about patient representativeness or their ability to participate in drug development conversations, and the costs in time and resources involved relative to returns on investment.
CONCLUSIONS: As health care systems continue to evolve and establish patients as the primary stakeholder in their health care decision making, the pharmaceutical industry will need to be innovative to demonstrate the value of their products relative to the outcomes experienced by patients. Pharmaceutical companies should recognize the value of involving patients across the entire product life cycle and work to transform present perceptions and practices throughout their organizations.
Copyright © 2016 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; drug development; methodology; patient-centered

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27712716     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  31 in total

1.  The Utility of Patient Engagement in Drug Research and Development.

Authors:  Avani Patel; Daniel Fiebig; Juliette Muszka
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2021-05-25

2.  Beyond study participants: a framework for engaging patients in the selection or development of clinical outcome assessments for evaluating the benefits of treatment in medical product development.

Authors:  Hilary Wilson; Ebony Dashiell-Aje; Milena Anatchkova; Karin Coyne; Asha Hareendran; Nancy Kline Leidy; Colleen A McHorney; Kathy Wyrwich
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Reflections on the Evolution of Patient Engagement in Drug Development.

Authors:  Kenneth Getz
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2019-06

4.  Patient Experience Data for Medical Product Development: Opportunity Beyond Obligation.

Authors:  Robyn T Carson
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 5.  Practices of patient engagement in drug development: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Olga Zvonareva; Constanța Craveț; Dawn P Richards
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2022-06-29

6.  A qualitative study on the involvement of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer during multiple research phases: "plan, structure, and discuss".

Authors:  Camila Rosalinde van Ham; Vivian Wilhelmina Gerarda Burgers; Sophia Helena Eva Sleeman; Annemiek Dickhout; Niels Christiaan Gerardus Laurus Harthoorn; Eveliene Manten-Horst; Mies Christina van Eenbergen; Olga Husson
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2022-07-08

7.  User-Centered Development and Testing of the Online Patient-Reported Outcomes, Burdens, and Experiences (PROBE) Survey and the myPROBE App and Integration With the Canadian Bleeding Disorder Registry: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Federico Germini; Victoria Borg Debono; David Page; Victoria Zuk; Alexandra Kucher; Chris Cotoi; Nicholas Hobson; Michael Sevestre; Mark W Skinner; Alfonso Iorio
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2022-03-02

Review 8.  Exploring patient and family involvement in the lifecycle of an orphan drug: a scoping review.

Authors:  Andrea Young; Devidas Menon; Jackie Street; Walla Al-Hertani; Tania Stafinski
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.123

9.  Comparison of Cellulite Severity Scales and Imaging Methods.

Authors:  V Leroy Young; Barry E DiBernardo
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.283

10.  Investigating Patients' Preferences to Inform Drug Development Decisions: Novel Insights from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Migraine.

Authors:  Aleksandra Torbica; Carla Rognoni; Rosanna Tarricone
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.