Literature DB >> 34031819

The Utility of Patient Engagement in Drug Research and Development.

Avani Patel1, Daniel Fiebig2, Juliette Muszka2.   

Abstract

Drug development of transformative medicine has compounding complexity as researchers seek to address the varying needs of patients, providers, payers, and policymakers. Patient engagement frameworks and guidance are under development with health authorities that will further guide patient engagement in drug research. Patient insights have been captured in registries, online health networks, and other forums to inform evidence on disease progression and identify gaps in care. Patient representation and disease awareness have improved in partnership with patient advocacy groups that have led to patient-informed drug development. One effort to incorporate the patient voice into early research and development (R&D) is the Patient Insights Database (PID). Currently comprising 102 indications, the PID was developed to uncover trends in mixed methods research data, including direct patient interviews and evidence-based medicine. The database is used to understand patient symptomology, diagnosis, treatment, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), economic burden, and hope for new therapies, based on patient interviews, patient testimonials, real-world evidence studies, and HR-QoL research. A deep understanding of the patient experience informs internal R&D decisions to bring forth healthcare solutions that address patient needs.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34031819     DOI: 10.1007/s40290-021-00388-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmaceut Med        ISSN: 1178-2595


  5 in total

1.  Increasing Patient Involvement in Drug Development.

Authors:  Maria M Lowe; David A Blaser; Lisa Cone; Steve Arcona; John Ko; Rahul Sasane; Paul Wicks
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 2.  Patient value: Perspectives from the advocacy community.

Authors:  Bonnie J Addario; Ana Fadich; Jesme Fox; Linda Krebs; Deborah Maskens; Kathy Oliver; Erin Schwartz; Gilliosa Spurrier-Bernard; Timothy Turnham
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  EUPATI and Patients in Medicines Research and Development: Guidance for Patient Involvement in Regulatory Processes.

Authors:  David Haerry; Cordula Landgraf; Kay Warner; Amy Hunter; Ingrid Klingmann; Matthew May; Wolf See
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-08-17

4.  Assessing the Financial Value of Patient Engagement: A Quantitative Approach from CTTI's Patient Groups and Clinical Trials Project.

Authors:  Bennett Levitan; Kenneth Getz; Eric L Eisenstein; Michelle Goldberg; Matthew Harker; Sharon Hesterlee; Bray Patrick-Lake; Jamie N Roberts; Joseph DiMasi
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 1.778

5.  Building Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research: Case Study From ADVANCE Clinical Data Research Network.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Warren; James A Gaudino; Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman; Kristin Dickerson; Lynn Robbins; Kathy Norman; John Lind; Sele D'Amato; Perry Foley; Rachel Gold; Vance Bauer; Scott A Fields; Deborah J Cohen; Khaya D Clark; Jennifer E DeVoe
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.983

  5 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Development of synthetic biotics as treatment for human diseases.

Authors:  Aoife M Brennan
Journal:  Synth Biol (Oxf)       Date:  2022-01-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.