Literature DB >> 27711949

Advanced endoscopic imaging: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technology Review.

James E East1, Jasper L Vleugels2, Philip Roelandt3, Pradeep Bhandari4, Raf Bisschops3, Evelien Dekker2, Cesare Hassan5, Gareth Horgan6, Ralf Kiesslich7, Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton4, Ana Wilson8, Jean-Marc Dumonceau9.   

Abstract

Background and aim: This technical review is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). It addresses the utilization of advanced endoscopic imaging in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy.
Methods: This technical review is based on a systematic literature search to evaluate the evidence supporting the use of advanced endoscopic imaging throughout the GI tract. Technologies considered include narrowed-spectrum endoscopy (narrow band imaging [NBI]; flexible spectral imaging color enhancement [FICE]; i-Scan digital contrast [I-SCAN]), autofluorescence imaging (AFI), and confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendation and the quality of evidence. Main recommendations:1. We suggest advanced endoscopic imaging technologies improve mucosal visualization and enhance fine structural and microvascular detail. Expert endoscopic diagnosis may be improved by advanced imaging, but as yet in community-based practice no technology has been shown consistently to be diagnostically superior to current practice with high definition white light. (Low quality evidence.) 2. We recommend the use of validated classification systems to support the use of optical diagnosis with advanced endoscopic imaging in the upper and lower GI tracts (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). 3. We suggest that training improves performance in the use of advanced endoscopic imaging techniques and that it is a prerequisite for use in clinical practice. A learning curve exists and training alone does not guarantee sustained high performances in clinical practice. (Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.)
Conclusion: Advanced endoscopic imaging can improve mucosal visualization and endoscopic diagnosis; however it requires training and the use of validated classification systems. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27711949     DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-118087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  44 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection : A short review.

Authors:  Ante Tonkic; Jonatan Vukovic; Pavle Vrebalov Cindro; Valdi Pesutic Pisac; Marija Tonkic
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 2.  A guide to multimodal endoscopy imaging for gastrointestinal malignancy - an early indicator.

Authors:  Arthur Hoffman; Henrik Manner; Johannes W Rey; Ralf Kiesslich
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Steerable OCT catheter for real-time assistance during teleoperated endoscopic treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Oscar Caravaca Mora; Philippe Zanne; Lucile Zorn; Florent Nageotte; Natalia Zulina; Sara Gravelyn; Paul Montgomery; Michel de Mathelin; Bernard Dallemagne; Michalina J Gora
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Endoscopic approach to polyp recognition.

Authors:  Conor Lahiff; James E East
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-10

5.  Fiber-optic large-depth 3D chromatic confocal endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Xuefang Yang; Ye Wang; Hejun Zhang; Haoye Qin; Siyu Wang; Yihang Tong; Keji Zhou; Rui Sun; Shuhua Yue; Xun Chen; Shigang Ding; Pu Wang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 6.  Electronic chromo-endoscopy: technical details and a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Partha Pal; Aniruddha Pratap Singh; Navya D Kanuri; Rupa Banerjee
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-25

Review 7.  Current status and limitations of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Hann; Joel Troya; Daniel Fitting
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 8.  Today's Mistakes and Tomorrow's Wisdom in Endoscopic Imaging of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Lisanne E van Heijst; Xiaojuan Zhao; Ruben Y Gabriëls; Wouter B Nagengast
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2022-03-30

9.  Determination of the optical properties of cholesteatoma in the spectral range of 250 to 800 nm.

Authors:  Eric L Wisotzky; Philipp Arens; Steffen Dommerich; Anna Hilsmann; Peter Eisert; Florian C Uecker
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 10.  Artificial Intelligence Applied to Gastrointestinal Diagnostics: A Review.

Authors:  Vatsal Patel; Marium N Khan; Aman Shrivastava; Kamran Sadiq; S Asad Ali; Sean R Moore; Donald E Brown; Sana Syed
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.