Literature DB >> 35814977

Today's Mistakes and Tomorrow's Wisdom in Endoscopic Imaging of Barrett's Esophagus.

Lisanne E van Heijst1, Xiaojuan Zhao1,2, Ruben Y Gabriëls1, Wouter B Nagengast1.   

Abstract

Background: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is one of the main causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide and its incidence is rising. Barrett's esophagus (BE) can develop low- and high-grade dysplasia which can progress to EAC overtime. The golden standard to detect dysplastic BE (DBE) or EAC is surveillance with high-definition white-light endoscopy (HD-WLE) and random biopsies according to the Seattle protocol. However, this method is time-consuming and associated with a remarkable miss rate. Therefore, there is great need for the development of novel reliable techniques to optimize surveillance strategies and improve detection rates. Summary: Optical chromoendoscopy (OC) techniques like narrow-band imaging have shown improved detection of DBE and EAC compared to HD-WLE and random biopsies. Most recent OC techniques, including the iSCAN optical enhancement system and linked color imaging, showed improved characterization of DBE and EAC retrospectively. Fluorescence molecular endoscopy (FME) presented promising results to highlight DBE and EAC. Moreover, with the establishment of well-performing delineation computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithms and the first real-time CAD system for EAC, we expect clinical application of CAD in the near future. Key Messages: Despite impressive progress made in the development of advanced endoscopic techniques, combined HD-WLE/OC followed by random biopsies remains the golden standard for BE surveillance. Surveillance depends on appropriate mucosal cleansing, sufficient inspection time, and competence of the performing gastroenterologist to improve detection of EAC. In addition, to facilitate the clinical implementation of advanced endoscopic techniques, multicenter prospective clinical studies are demanded for OC and FME. Meanwhile, further optimization of CAD algorithms, the education of gastroenterologists, and analysis of the interaction between the clinician and the computer should be performed.
Copyright © 2022 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett's esophagus; Chromoendoscopy; Computer-aided detection; Esophageal adenocarcinoma; Molecular imaging

Year:  2022        PMID: 35814977      PMCID: PMC9210038          DOI: 10.1159/000523907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Visc Med        ISSN: 2297-4725


  44 in total

1.  The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on imaging in Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Prateek Sharma; Thomas J Savides; Marcia I Canto; Douglas A Corley; Gary W Falk; John R Goldblum; Kenneth K Wang; Michael B Wallace; Herbert C Wolfsen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Advanced endoscopic imaging: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technology Review.

Authors:  James E East; Jasper L Vleugels; Philip Roelandt; Pradeep Bhandari; Raf Bisschops; Evelien Dekker; Cesare Hassan; Gareth Horgan; Ralf Kiesslich; Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton; Ana Wilson; Jean-Marc Dumonceau
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Detection of lesions in dysplastic Barrett's esophagus by community and expert endoscopists.

Authors:  Dirk W Schölvinck; Kim van der Meulen; Jacques J G H M Bergman; Bas L A M Weusten
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Improved biopsy accuracy in Barrett's esophagus with a transparent cap.

Authors:  Bai-Li Chen; Xiang-Bin Xing; Jin-Hui Wang; Ting Feng; Li-Shou Xiong; Jin-Ping Wang; Yi Cui
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin R Alsop; Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.806

6.  Comparison of computed virtual chromoendoscopy and conventional chromoendoscopy with acetic acid for detection of neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  J Pohl; A May; T Rabenstein; O Pech; M Nguyen-Tat; A Fissler-Eckhoff; C Ell
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Comparative diagnostic performance of volumetric laser endomicroscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy in the detection of dysplasia associated with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Cadman L Leggett; Emmanuel C Gorospe; Daniel K Chan; Prasuna Muppa; Victoria Owens; Thomas C Smyrk; Marlys Anderson; Lori S Lutzke; Guillermo Tearney; Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  A randomized controlled trial of pre-procedure simethicone and N-acetylcysteine to improve mucosal visibility during gastroscopy - NICEVIS.

Authors:  Peter John Basford; James Brown; Lisa Gadeke; Carole Fogg; Ben Haysom-Newport; Reuben Ogollah; Rupam Bhattacharyya; Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton; Fergus Thursby-Pelham; James R Neale; Pradeep Bhandari
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-10-28

9.  TXI: Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging for Endoscopic Image Enhancement.

Authors:  Tomoya Sato
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.682

10.  Real-time use of artificial intelligence in the evaluation of cancer in Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  Alanna Ebigbo; Robert Mendel; Andreas Probst; Johannes Manzeneder; Friederike Prinz; Luis A de Souza; Joao Papa; Christoph Palm; Helmut Messmann
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.