| Literature DB >> 27711207 |
Beverly A Schaefer1, Jonathan M Flanagan2, Ofelia A Alvarez3, Stephen C Nelson4, Banu Aygun5, Kerri A Nottage6, Alex George2, Carla W Roberts7, Connie M Piccone8, Thad A Howard1, Barry R Davis9, Russell E Ware1.
Abstract
Discovery and validation of genetic variants that influence disease severity in children with sickle cell anemia (SCA) could lead to early identification of high-risk patients, better screening strategies, and intervention with targeted and preventive therapy. We hypothesized that newly identified genetic risk factors for the general African American population could also impact laboratory biomarkers known to contribute to the clinical disease expression of SCA, including variants influencing the white blood cell count and the development of albuminuria and abnormal glomerular filtration rate. We first investigated candidate genetic polymorphisms in well-characterized SCA pediatric cohorts from three prospective NHLBI-supported clinical trials: HUSTLE, SWiTCH, and TWiTCH. We also performed whole exome sequencing to identify novel genetic variants, using both a discovery and a validation cohort. Among candidate genes, DARC rs2814778 polymorphism regulating Duffy antigen expression had a clear influence with significantly increased WBC and neutrophil counts, but did not affect the maximum tolerated dose of hydroxyurea therapy. The APOL1 G1 polymorphism, an identified risk factor for non-diabetic renal disease, was associated with albuminuria. Whole exome sequencing discovered several novel variants that maintained significance in the validation cohorts, including ZFHX4 polymorphisms affecting both the leukocyte and neutrophil counts, as well as AGGF1, CYP4B1, CUBN, TOR2A, PKD1L2, and CD163 variants affecting the glomerular filtration rate. The identification of robust, reliable, and reproducible genetic markers for disease severity in SCA remains elusive, but new genetic variants provide avenues for further validation and investigation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27711207 PMCID: PMC5053442 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164364
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Association of candidate genes with WBC and ANC.
| Gene | dbSNP ID | MAF | Reference | WBC | ANC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta value (SD) | p value | Beta value (SD) | p value | ||||
| rs2814778 | .151 | .205 | 1.02 (0.43) | .023 | 0.92 (0.31) | .008 | |
| rs12075 | .059 | .148 | 0.75 (0.63) | .259 | 0.97 (0.45) | .039 | |
| rs4657616 | .069 | .098 | 1.22 (0.62) | .061 | 0.62 (0.44) | .120 | |
| rs4065321 | .386 | .352 | 0.39 (0.32) | .182 | 0.32 (0.23) | .146 | |
| rs445 | .188 | .115 | -0.21 (0.41) | .597 | -0.15 (0.28) | .725 | |
| rs9131 | .202 | .295 | -0.27 (0.41) | .436 | -0.14 (0.23) | .689 | |
The reference frequencies were taken from 1000 genomes in African American individuals (n = 61). MAF, minor allele frequency; SD, standard deviation. The beta value indicates the average change in values per allele of each variant.
Genetic variants identified by WES associated with either WBC or ANC.
| # | Gene | Chr | Position | dbSNP ID | MAF | WBC Overall p-value | WBC Effect size (SE) | ANC Overall p-value | ANC Effect size (SE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | 66958886 | rs7198458 | .131 | .000033 | -0.216 (0.051) | .00157 | -0.165 (0.051) | ||
| 6 | 109885475 | rs10499052 | .061 | .000088 | 0.201 (0.051) | .00019 | 0.191 (0.051) | ||
| 6 | 129824406 | rs73599293 | .066 | .00011 | 0.198 (0.051) | .00578 | 0.142 (0.051) | ||
| 9 | 140277826 | rs13291830 | .236 | .00023 | -0.189 (0.051) | .00118 | -0.167 (0.051) | ||
| 15 | 68609647 | rs2271725 | .313 | .00034 | 0.183 (0.051) | .02788 | 0.112 (0.051) | ||
| 8 | 7764073 | rs28376707 | .085 | .00045 | 0.179 (0.051) | .000082 | 0.202 (0.051) | ||
| 1 | 156641537 | rs951781 | .094 | .000011 | 0.225 (0.051) | .0000003 | 0.263 (0.051) | ||
| 7 | 23728931 | rs35495590 | .039 | .00160 | -0.161 (0.051) | .000027 | -0.216 (0.051) | ||
| 19 | 12767849 | rs34544747 | .238 | .00515 | 0.143 (0.051) | .000082 | 0.202 (0.051) | ||
| 11 | 123894119 | rs12366219 | .112 | .00042 | -0.181 (0.051) | .00024 | -0.189 (0.051) | ||
| 19 | 8326866 | rs17160348 | .146 | .00203 | 0.158 (0.051) | .00025 | 0.188 (0.051) |
The gene name and dbSNP ID are given for each polymorphism, along with the MAF in the whole cohort (n = 383). From the discovery and validation analysis, we identified six variants associated with WBC that passed the discovery and validation thresholds (#1–6). Similarly, we identified six variants associated with ANC after discovery and validation (#6–11). The ZFHX4 variant was significantly associated with both WBC and ANC.
Association of candidate gene variants with the presence of albuminuria.
| Gene | dbSNP ID | MAF | Albuminuria (Additive) p value | Variant frequency | Odds Ratio (C.I) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Controls | |||||
| rs73885319 | .219 | .017 | 32.0% | 20.3% | 2.51 (1.18–5.46) | |
| rs71785313 | .160 | .048 | 10.0% | 16.0% | 0.36 (0.12–0.99) | |
| rs2814778 | .136 | .046 | 4.2% | 15.7% | 0.29 (0.07–0.99) | |
| VNTR | .312 | .333 | 31.5% | 22.7% | - | |
| rs1799983 | .125 | .883 | 14.6% | 12.2% | 0.93 (0.36–2.43) | |
| rs2070744 | .156 | .263 | 10.4% | 16.3% | 0.58 (0.21–1.59) | |
| rs7918972 | .162 | .345 | 12.5% | 16.8% | 0.64 (0.24–1.71) | |
| rs1801239 | .027 | .199 | 0.0% | 3.1% | - | |
A case:control association test was performed for each polymorphism using a correlation trend test with correction for age and sex.
*4a variant compared to all other eNOS variants.
Coding variants associated with glomerular filtration rate.
| Gene | Chr | Position | dbSNP ID | MAF | DTPA GFR | eGFR | Meta-Analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p-value | Beta-Value (SD) | p-value | Beta-Value (SD) | p-value | Effect size (SE) | |||||
| 16 | 81181120 | rs76056952 | .031 | .0443 | -24.4 (13.3) | .0009 | -61.8 (28.9) | .00011 | -0.28 (0.07) | |
| 5 | 76332468 | rs72765108 | .083 | .0014 | 35.7 (10.5) | .0127 | 44.8 (17.1) | .00011 | 0.28 (0.07) | |
| 9 | 130494486 | rs114990094 | .031 | .0475 | -32.5 (17.4) | .0031 | -63.9 (26.8) | .00037 | -0.26 (0.07) | |
| 10 | 16893332 | rs111265129 | .039 | .0469 | -48.8 (25.8) | .0160 | -42.4 (20.1) | .00186 | -0.23 (0.07) | |
| 1 | 47280852 | rs12094024 | .073 | .0223 | 37.6 (13.3) | .0369 | 42.7 (17.1) | .00256 | 0.22 (0.07) | |
| 12 | 7640395 | rs61729510 | .042 | .0091 | 68.2 (20.3) | .0588 | 51.8 (19.0) | .00237 | 0.23 (0.07) | |
From the discovery (DTPA GFR) and validation (eGFR) analysis, five variants were identified that passed both discovery and validation significance thresholds (p < .05). An additional variant in CD163 closely approached significance in the validation cohort. Beta-Value refers to the average change in the GFR, per allele of each listed variant.