| Literature DB >> 25360671 |
Vivien A Sheehan1, Jacy R Crosby2, Aniko Sabo3, Nicole A Mortier4, Thad A Howard4, Donna M Muzny3, Shannon Dugan-Perez3, Banu Aygun5, Kerri A Nottage6, Eric Boerwinkle7, Richard A Gibbs3, Russell E Ware4, Jonathan M Flanagan1.
Abstract
Hydroxyurea has proven efficacy in children and adults with sickle cell anemia (SCA), but with considerable inter-individual variability in the amount of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) produced. Sibling and twin studies indicate that some of that drug response variation is heritable. To test the hypothesis that genetic modifiers influence pharmacological induction of HbF, we investigated phenotype-genotype associations using whole exome sequencing of children with SCA treated prospectively with hydroxyurea to maximum tolerated dose (MTD). We analyzed 171 unrelated patients enrolled in two prospective clinical trials, all treated with dose escalation to MTD. We examined two MTD drug response phenotypes: HbF (final %HbF minus baseline %HbF), and final %HbF. Analyzing individual genetic variants, we identified multiple low frequency and common variants associated with HbF induction by hydroxyurea. A validation cohort of 130 pediatric sickle cell patients treated to MTD with hydroxyurea was genotyped for 13 non-synonymous variants with the strongest association with HbF response to hydroxyurea in the discovery cohort. A coding variant in Spalt-like transcription factor, or SALL2, was associated with higher final HbF in this second independent replication sample and SALL2 represents an outstanding novel candidate gene for further investigation. These findings may help focus future functional studies and provide new insights into the pharmacological HbF upregulation by hydroxyurea in patients with SCA.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25360671 PMCID: PMC4215999 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110740
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Comparison of discovery and validation cohorts.
| Discovery Cohort | Validation Cohort | Discovery Cohort | Validation Cohort | |||||
|
| 10.4 | ±4.5 | 8.1 | ±4.0 | - | - | ||
|
| 13.5 | ±4.2 | 13.1 | ±5.7 | 6.5 | ±2.0 | 6.9 | ±2.0 |
|
| 7.2 | ±3.2 | 6.2 | ±4.3 | 3.0 | ±1.2 | 2.7 | ±0.9 |
|
| 9.1 | ±0.9 | 8.0 | ±1.7 | 9.4 | ±1.0 | 9.5 | ±1.3 |
|
| 0.28 | ±0.13 | 0.29 | ±0.12 | 0.17 | ±0.09 | 0.12 | ±0.05 |
|
| 86.1 | ±4.8 | 82.1 | ±8.3 | 116.4 | ±13.0 | 97.7 | ±11.1 |
|
| 8.0 | ±4.9 | 11.9 | ±5.9 | 27.6 | ±7.3 | 25.8 | ±8.2 |
|
| - | - | 19.5 | ±6.6 | 13.9 | +7.0 | ||
|
| - | - | 25.1 | ±4.5 | 27.1 | ±4.3 | ||
WBC: white blood cell count; ANC: absolute neutrophil count; ARC: absolute reticulocyte count; MCV: mean corpuscular volume; HU: hydroxyurea.
The discovery cohort was composed of 120 patients from HUSTLE and 51 from SWiTCH. The validation cohort was collected from patients treated at TCCH.
Figure 1Comparison of discovery and validation cohorts.
A, Baseline, or endogenous HbF for the discovery cohort is shown in binned histogram, and distribution of baseline HbF in validation cohort by a line plot. B, Delta HbF for the discovery cohort is shown in binned histogram, and distribution of delta HbF in validation cohort by a line plot. C, Final, or MID HbF for the discovery cohort is shown in binned histogram, and distribution of final, or MID in validation cohort by a line plot.
Variants associated with ΔHbF on hydroxyurea.
| Gene | SNP ID | Amino Acid Change | Protein Function Prediction | MAF (%) | Function | Beta Value | SE | P-value |
|
| rs141631682 | Gly109Asp | Damaging | 2 | Microtubule assembly | 10.9 | 2.7 | 7.41×10−5 |
|
| rs2273668 | Leu103Ile | Damaging | 2 | Peroxiredoxin reduction | 9.3 | 2.3 | 8.88×10−5 |
|
| rs17126352 | Val416Ile | Benign | 3 | Metalloprotease | 7.1 | 1.8 | 1.35×10−4 |
|
| rs61746132 | Pro1676Lys | Damaging | 12 | Calcium dependent cell adhesion | 3.9 | 1.0 | 1.73×10−4 |
|
| rs61749462 | Arg364Ser | Damaging | 3 | Keratin 80 | 8.0 | 2.1 | 1.80×10−4 |
|
| rs61743453 | Pro840Arg | Damaging | 4 | Transcription factor | 6.7 | 1.8 | 2.37×10−4 |
|
| rs61742645 | Arg779Cys | Benign | 2 | PP1 interacting protein | 8.7 | 2.3 | 2.43×10−4 |
|
| rs35108810 | Asp246Val | Damaging | 15 |
| −3.3 | 0.9 | 3.47×10−4 |
|
| rs16955011 | Val92Met | Damaging | 18 | Ring finger protein | 3.1 | 0.8 | 3.76×10−4 |
|
| rs55904231 | Ser11Phe | Benign | 7 | RNA methyltransferase | 5.2 | 1.4 | 3.76×10−4 |
|
| rs28626308 | Arg70Gln | Damaging | 7 | Rho GTPase binding protein | 5.2 | 1.4 | 3.91×10−4 |
|
| rs17843865 | Tyr587Cys | Benign | 4 | Adenosine deaminase | −6.4 | 1.8 | 4.65×10−4 |
Variants selected were predicted damaging, with a p-value <0.001 in the discovery cohort, n = 171, composed of patients from HUSTLE and SWiTCH trials.
Variants associated with final HbF on hydroxyurea.
| Gene | SNP ID | Amino Acid Change | Protein Function Prediction | MAF (%) | Function | Beta Value | SE | P-value |
|
| rs61750777 | Ala154Val | Damaging | 6 | Radial spoke protein | −6.5 | 1.6 | 6.55×10−5 |
|
| rs11053646 | Lys167Asn | Benign | 2 | Opioid receptor | 3.4 | 0.9 | 1.22×10−4 |
|
| rs11819496 | Arg478Thr | Damaging | 2 | ER transport | −12.0 | 3.1 | 1.55×10−4 |
|
| rs34510432 | Arg85 His | Damaging | 2 | ER transport | 9.9 | 2.6 | 1.88×10−4 |
|
| rs16955011 | Val92Met | Damaging | 18 | Ring finger protein | 3.4 | 0.9 | 1.93×10−4 |
|
| rs6967330 | Cys529Tyr | Benign | 29 | Calcium dependent cell adhesion | 3.1 | 0.8 | 2.58×10−4 |
|
| rs3770655 | Pro771Ser | Benign | 89 | Ewing's tumor associated antigen | 4.3 | 1.2 | 2.84×10−4 |
|
| rs113596156 | Arg35Gln | Benign | 2 | Polyglycylase | 9.8 | 2.7 | 2.91×10−4 |
|
| rs869801 | Ala1793Thr | Benign | 21 | Cytokinesis | −3.5 | 1.0 | 3.60×10−4 |
|
| rs899441 | Lys637Glu | Benign | 6 | MYB associated | −5.4 | 1.5 | 4.26×10−4 |
|
| rs116835087 | Gly587Ser | Damaging | 6 | Membrane-associated ring finger | −6.0 | 1.7 | 4.33×10−4 |
|
| rs11972142 | Thr879Ala | Benign | 15 | Polycystic kidney disease like | 3.6 | 1.0 | 4.78×10−4 |
|
| rs16859886 | Thr234Met | Benign | 12 | Adenyl cyclase | 3.9 | 1.1 | 4.96×10−4 |
Variants selected were predicted damaging, with a p-value <0.001 in the discovery cohort, n = 171, composed of patients from HUSTLE and SWiTCH trials.
Figure 2Effect of SALL2 variant rs61743453 on HbF response to hydroxyurea.
A, Effect of rs61743453 on delta HbF in discovery cohort. B, Effect of rs61743453 on MTD HbF in validation cohort. Variant refers to the Pro840Arg variant; no individuals were homozygous for this change.