Literature DB >> 15038110

Evaluation of MPN method combined with PCR procedure for detection and enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood.

Norinaga Miwa1, Tomohiro Nishio, Yono Arita, Fumihiko Kawamori, Takashi Masuda, Masato Akiyama.   

Abstract

Vibrio parahaemolyticus densities in spiked and naturally contaminated seafood samples were enumerated by the MPN method combined with a PCR procedure (MPN-PCR method) targeting the species-specific thermolabile hemolysin gene (tlh), and by the MPN method using subcultivation of alkaline-peptone-water (APW) enrichment culture on thiosulfate-citrate-bile-sucrose (TCBS) agar (MPN-TCBS method). In the samples spiked with both V. parahaemolyticus and V. alginolyticus, the numbers of V. parahaemolyticus enumerated by the MPN-PCR method were similar to, or higher than the numbers of spiked cells, whereas those enumerated by the MPN-TCBS method were below the numbers of spiked cells. In naturally contaminated seafood samples, the numbers of V. parahaemolyticus enumerated by the MPN-PCR method were higher than those by the MPN-TCBS method. In the case of the MPN-TCBS method, isolation of V. parahaemolyticus from some APW cultures was difficult because of the overgrowth of many colonies other than V. parahaemolyticus (e.g., V. alginolyticus) on TCBS agar. In contrast, the PCR technique could detect tlh from APW culture without isolation of V. parahaemolyticus, so the possibility of failing to obtain a positive result in APW culture by the MPN-PCR method was considered to be lower than that by the MPN-TCBS method. Furthermore, utilization of the PCR technique reduces the time and labor required for the biochemical identification tests used in the MPN-TCBS method. For the detection and enumeration of V. parahaemolyticus in seafood, especially for samples that show many colonies other than V. parahaemolyticus on TCBS agar, the MPN-PCR method may be more convenient and reliable than the MPN-TCBS method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15038110     DOI: 10.3358/shokueishi.44.289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi        ISSN: 0015-6426            Impact factor:   0.464


  6 in total

1.  Quantification of Vibrio species in oysters from the Gulf of Mexico with two procedures based on MPN and PCR.

Authors:  Guadalupe Barrera-Escorcia; Irma Wong-Chang; Carlos Leopoldo Fernández-Rendón; Alfonso Vázquez Botello; Bruno Gómez-Gil; Marcial Leonardo Lizárraga-Partida
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Rapid quantitative detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood by MPN-PCR.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Luan; Jixiang Chen; Yu Liu; Yun Li; Juntao Jia; Rui Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhang
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Detection and Quantification of Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Vibrio vulnificus in Coastal Waters of Guinea-Bissau (West Africa).

Authors:  Ana Machado; Adriano A Bordalo
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.184

4.  Development of a multiplex real-time PCR assay with an internal amplification control for the detection of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus bacteria in oysters.

Authors:  Jessica L Nordstrom; Michael C L Vickery; George M Blackstone; Shelley L Murray; Angelo DePaola
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a review on the pathogenesis, prevalence, and advance molecular identification techniques.

Authors:  Vengadesh Letchumanan; Kok-Gan Chan; Learn-Han Lee
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  The prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in vegetables, fruits, and fresh produce: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hooriyeh Mohammadpour; Enayat Berizi; Saeid Hosseinzadeh; Majid Majlesi; Morteza Zare
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 4.181

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.