Literature DB >> 27708726

Bisphenol A Release: Survey of the Composition of Dental Composite Resins.

Elisabeth Dursun1, Hélène Fron-Chabouis2, Jean-Pierre Attal2, Anne Raskin3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bisphenol A (BPA) is an endocrine disruptor with potential toxicity. Composite resins may not contain pure BPA, but its derivatives are widely used. Several studies found doses of BPA or its derivatives in saliva or urine of patients after composite resin placement.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to establish an exhaustive list of composite resins marketed in Europe and their composition, and to assess the extent of BPA derivatives used.
METHODS: A research on manufacturers' websites was performed to reference all composite resins marketed in Europe, then their composition was determined from both material safety data sheets and a standardized questionnaire sent to manufacturers. Manufacturers had to indicate whether their product contained the monomers listed, add other monomers if necessary, or indicate "not disclosed".
RESULTS: 160 composite resins were identified from 31 manufacturers and 23 manufacturers (74.2%) responded to the survey. From the survey and websites, the composition of 130 composite resins (81.2%) was: 112 (86.2%) based on BPA derivatives, 97 (74.7%) on bis-GMA, 17 (13.1%) without monomer derived from BPA (UDMA, sometimes with TEGDMA) and 6 (4.6%) with UDMA (only); 1 (0.8%) did not contain a BPA derivative or UDMA or TEGDMA. Pure BPA was never reported.
CONCLUSION: This work has established a list of 18 composite resins that contain no BPA derivative. Manufacturers should be required to report the exact composition of their products as it often remains unclear or incomplete.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocompatibility; Bisphenol A; Composite resin; Monomer

Year:  2016        PMID: 27708726      PMCID: PMC5039892          DOI: 10.2174/1874210601610010446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Dent J        ISSN: 1874-2106


INTRODUCTION

Bisphenol A (BPA) is an organic compound used in the industrial production of polycarbonates and epoxy resins [1]. However, BPA is an endocrine disruptor, with potential toxicity in vitro [2] and in vivo [3]. Among other effects, it can cause changes in the structure of the unborn child’s mammary glands - promoting further tumor development - and has effects on the brain and behavior, the female reproductive system, and metabolism and obesity [4]. Infants, young children and pregnant or lactating women are the most sensitive [5]. Thus, the manufacturing of baby bottles containing BPA has been banned by the European Union since 2011. From January 1, 2015, France has banned BPA in all food packaging. In its latest comprehensive re-evaluation of BPA exposure and toxicity, the European Food Safety Authorities has concluded no risks at actual exposure levels [6]. However, a lower Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) has been set at 4µg/kg bw/day (ie 12.5 times less than the last TDI). Besides, its possible “low-dose effect” [7-9], defined as “any biological changes occurring in the range of typical human exposures, or biological changes that occur at doses below those used in traditional toxicology studies” was suspected. Pure BPA is not a component of dental composite resins. However, derivatives of BPA - from pure BPA - are widely used: bisphenol A diglycidyl methacrylate (bis-GMA) especially, but also bisphenol A dimethacrylate (bis-DMA), polycarbonate-modified bis-GMA (PC bis-GMA), ethoxylated bisphenol A glycol dimethacrylate (bis-EMA) and 2,2-bis[(4-methacryloxy polyethoxy)phenyl]propane (bis-MPEPP). Several studies have investigated the levels of BPA and its derivatives in the saliva or urine after polymerization of a restoration made of a composite resin containing at least one of these monomers. The results vary: some studies in vitro [10] and in vivo [11] have detected some levels (in very low doses) and others do not detect any [12]. This BPA elution would result from impurities in the synthesis of resins or their degradation [13]. These variations can be explained by the different susceptibility of BPA derivatives to hydrolysis by salivary esterases. Bis-GMA does not undergo this reaction, because its chemical structure with stable ether bonds prevents hydrolysis. However, bis-DMA hydrolyzes at its ester bonds, releasing an amount of BPA that is not negligible. These differences could also be related to the detection technique [14]. Furthermore, a recent study showed absorption of BPA by the sublingual area in dogs, allowing its direct entry into the bloodstream, by passing the digestive system and liver and multiplying its bioavailability by a factor of 80 [15]. Yet, the exact composition of the composite resins on the market and the potential composite resins without BPA derivatives are not known. No study has sought to identify all monomers contained in the marketed composite resins. The objectives of this study were first, to provide an exhaustive list of the composite resins sold in Europe and detail their composition and second, to estimate the number of composite resins using BPA or BPA derivatives (bis-GMA, bis-DMA, bis-EMA, bis-MPEPP, PC bis-GMA) in their manufacturing.

MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY

To reference all composite resins sold in Europe, a search was conducted of the manufacturers' websites. Next, the composition of the composite resins was searched on the materials’ safety data sheet (MSDS) and using a standardized questionnaire sent to manufacturers. This questionnaire listed 13 monomers found in the MSDS and in the various studies of these materials; the manufacturer had to indicate, for each product, if the material contained these monomers or not, or else write “not disclosed” (ND). The manufacturer could also add monomers to the proposed list (Table ). Manufacturers were contacted by email and/or telephone and the details were transmitted by email; they had 4 months to answer and an extra 2 months after a reminder email. When the manufacturer had not answered or the information was not available (MSDS, internet), the result was noted as “ND”. All results were recorded and analyzed by using Microsoft Excel 2008, v12.3.6.

RESULTS

A total of 160 composite resins were identified from 31 companies (Table ); 23 companies (74.2%) responded to the survey, with complete responses for 119/135 composite resins they marketed (88%). For the 8 manufacturers who did not respond (25.8%), the search of the internet and especially the MSDS provided responses for 11 of the 25 composite resins marketed (44%). In total, 12 monomers were found in these 130 (119+11) composite resins; pure BPA was never reported. Table reports their frequency of use. Among the 130 composite resins: 112 (86.2%) contained BPA derivatives, 97 (74.7%) bis-GMA and 43 (33.1%) bis-GMA and urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA); 17 (13.1%) contained no monomer derived from BPA (UDMA, sometimes with TEGDMA) and 6 (4,6%) with UDMA (only); 1 (0.8%) did not contain a BPA derivative or UDMA or TEGDMA (Table ). 18 (13.8%) composite resins without any BPA derivative were identified. Among the 33 composite resins (25.4%) that did not contain bis-GMA, 24 (18.5%) did not contain bis-EMA and 18 (13.8%) did not contain bis-MPEPP. A single composite resin contained bis-DMA.

DISCUSSION

The adverse estrogenic effects of BPA are well established, which explains the new regulations banning this molecule, especially in food containers [4]. The elution of BPA sometimes detected after the making of a composite resin restoration remains far below toxic levels and at a certain time after placement, unpolymerized monomers would be completely absorbed into saliva, posing little risk of chronic low-dose BPA exposure, so some authors still encourage the use of molecules made from BPA [14, 16]. However, two factors seem to follow the recommendations against BPA content in composite resins. The first is related to the 2008 results of Bellinger et al. [17], who demonstrated that in children 6 to 10 years’ old, the presence of composite resins was associated with a psychosocial behavior that was worse than with amalgams. These results were confirmed and clarified by Maserejian et al. in 2012 [18], who indicated that the psychosocial behavior was worse for children with bis-GMA than UDMA composite resin restorations. Fortunately, the last studies of this team are more reassuring concerning sealants and fluid composite resin [19] and concerning the renal function of the children [20] or their immunity markers [21]. Recently, Maserejian et al. [22] in 2016 showed that placement of bis-GMA-based restorations in children and adolescents may temporarily increase BPA concentration in urine, but no longer detectable 14 days or 6 months after treatment. Second, BPA may have greater effects at low than high doses. Wozniack et al. [23] registered effects at doses of 1 pmol. The American National Toxicology Program [24] states that these low-dose effects can occur from 0.23 mg/L. This theory remains controversial [25]. However, the European Food Safety Authority decided last year recently to divide by 10 the maximum daily dose allowed (or 5 mg/kg/day). Moreover, exposure to BPA during gestation could induce increased spontaneous abortion, abnormal gestation time, reduced birth weight, increased male genital abnormalities, childhood obesity, but also altered behavior, disrupted neurodevelopment in children and increased asthma risk [26]. Because of these potential adverse developmental effects after prenatal exposure to BPA, it would be cautious to limit exposure to unpolymerized dental resin materials during pregnancy. Thus, it could be relevant to select composite resins that do not contain these derivatives for at-risk populations, such pregnant women [27] and as children [28]. Moreover, patients may ask about the possible bis-GMA content of composite resins. Whatever the opinion of the practitioner, he or she must know the composition of the composite resins used. In this study, 160 composite resins currently marketed by 31 manufacturers in Europe were identified. The composition of 130 (marketed by 23 manufacturers) was established: 112 (86.2%) contain BPA derivatives. Although we had a good response rate (74.2%), we could not obtain the composition of all the products because of strategic reasons, lack of reliable representatives or trade secrets. In total, 25.8% of the manufacturers did not agree to communicate the composition of their composite resins. They are not required to indicate the exact composition of the materials, which should be required as for drugs. MSDS forms indicate the product’s composition only partially, often mentioning only the family of the molecules. However, we should be cautioned against choosing one of the 18 composite resins without BPA derivatives: the latter contain other monomers that are not necessarily more biocompatible. Indeed, BPA is not the only potentially toxic monomer in composite resins; others may be toxic [29]. In particular, the structure of TEGDMA and HEMA can be degraded by salivary esterases and result in liposoluble metabolites that could accumulate in fatty tissues [30]. Even UDMA, deemed less risky, may present some cytotoxicity beyond a certain concentration [31]. Whatever the composite resin, a certain rate of unpolymerized monomers is released, which is associated with their characteristics, the degree of polymerization and the release medium [32]. Indirect and CAD-CAM composite restorations maximize the conversion rate and thus minimize the release. Certain procedures reduce exposure to free monomers due to direct composite restorations: rubber dam use, prolonged curing (up to double the recommended time) or a second curing step after covering the restoration with glycerin. In addition, these free monomers are mostly present on the surface of the material, where the exposure to oxygen inhibits polymerization. Hence, Rueggeberg et al. [33] and Komurcuoglu et al. [34] showed that brushing the restoration’s surface with pumice allowed for removal of the inhibition layer and eliminated more than 90% of the residual monomers. Applying a dry or wet cotton roll and, to a lesser extent, water/air spray also enables their withdrawal up to 70%. Sasaki et al. [35] showed that gargling with warm water for 30 sec after placement of the composite resin may reduce salivary levels of BPA. Finally, using alternative materials without resin would be ideal; some high-viscosity glass ionomers or inorganic biomaterials, carbomers (albeit with lower mechanical and aesthetic properties) or ceramic (for extended restorations) may be considered.

CONCLUSION

This study has established a list of 18 BPA derivative-free products that can be used on a daily basis by the general practitioner. The respective long-term effects on human health of the different monomers remain unclear and deserve to be the subject of cohort studies. Manufacturers should be required to report the exact composition of their products, as is required in the pharmaceutical industry, so that practitioners are able to communicate it to patients and to meet the traceability requirements.
Table 1

List of the surveyed monomers (found in materials’ safety data sheet and various studies of these resin composites and proposed to manufacturers) that resin composites can contain.

 Monomer (abbreviation)  Monomer (detailed chemical name)
 Bisphenol A2,2-bis(4-hydroxyphényl)propane
 Bis-GMA2,2-bis[4-(3-methacryloxy-2-hydroxypropoxy)phenyl]propane
 PC Bis-GMAPolycarbonate-modified bis-GMA
 Bis-DMA2,2-bis-(4-(méthacryloxy) phenyl) propane
 Bis-EMA or EBPADMAEthoxylated bisphenol-A glycol dimethacrylate
 Bis-MPEPP or BPEDMABisphenol A polyethoxy dimethacrylate or 2,2-bis(4-methacryloxy poly-ethoxyphenyl)propane
 UDMAUrethane dimethacrylate or 1,6-di(methacryloyloxyethylcarbamoyl)-3,3,5-trimethylhexan
 TEGDMATriethylene glycol dimethacrylate
 HEMAHydroxyethyl methacrylate
 HEDMAHexane diol dimethacrylate or 2-hydroxyethyl dimethacrylate
 TMPTMATrimethylolpropane trimethacrylate
 4-MET4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitic acid
 IBMAIsobutyl methacrylate
Table 2

List of the 160 composite resins marketed in Europe by 31 manufacturers and type of response (R) from the manufacturer (1: response; 2: partial response; 0: no response).

Fabricant R Composite Resins
3M ESPE1Filtek Bulk Fill Fluide, Filtek P60, Filtek Silorane, Filtek Supreme XTE, Filtek Supreme XTE fluide, Filtek Z250, Filtek Z500, Z100 MP
Alpha Dent0Alpha II AP, Alpha Flow, Alpha-Dent Light Cure, Alpha-Dent Self Cure
Apol1Ivoa, Ivoa flow, Xtrem nano, Sharkcomp, Sharkflow
Bisco1Aelite Aesthetic Enamel, Aelite All Purpose Body, Aelite LS Posterior, Aelite LS Packable, Aelite Flo, Aelite Flo LV
Cavex1Quadrant Anterior Shine, Quadrant Universal LC, Quadrant Flow
Centrix1C-R Hybrid, VersaFlo, VersaLite
Coltene Whaledent1Miris 2, Synergy D6, Synergy D6 Flow, Synergy Nano formula Duo Shades
Cosmedent0Renamel Flowable Microhybrid, Renamel Flowable Microfill, Renamel Microfill (+ superBrite), Renamel Posterior, Renamel Microhybrid (+ SuperBrite), Renamel Nano
DenMat2Virtuoso Flowable, Virtuoso Universal, Nuance, Nuance Flow
Dentoria0Flexfil
Dentsply2Ceram.X Duo, Ceram.X Mono +, Esthet.X HD, Esthet.X Flow, Quixfil TM, Spectrum TPH3, SDR, Surefill
Elsodent1Cirus, Must Flow
GC1EverX posterior, G-Aenial Anterior, G-Aenial posterior, G-Aenial Flow, G-Aenial Universal Flo, Kalore, Gradia Direct (X), Gradia Direct Flo, Gradia Direct LoFlo
Henry Schein0Natural Elegance, 20/20, Natural Elegance Flowable
Heraeus Kulzer1Charisma, Charisma Classic, Durafill VS, Charisma Flow, Solitaire 2, Venus, Venus Diamond, Venus Pearl, Venus Diamond flow, Venus Bulk Fill, Venus Flow
Itena1Reflectys, Reflectys Flow, Perfect Feel Flow
Ivoclar Vivadent1IPS Empress Direct, IPS Empress Direct Flow, Tetric, Tetric Ceram HB, Tetric EvoCeram, Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill, Tetric EvoFlow
Jeneric Pentron1Alert, Artiste, Flow-It ALC, Fusio Self-adhesive, Simile
Kent Dental0Kentfil Anterior, Kentflow, Kentfil Posterior, Microhybrid + Kent, Nanohybrid Kent Dental
Kerr Hawe2Herculite XRV Ultra, Herculite XRV, Point 4, Premise, Premise Flowable, Revolution 2, SonicFill, Vertise Flow (autoadhésif)
Kuraray1Clearfil AP-X, Clearfil Majesty ES-2, Clearfil Majesty Esthetic, Clearfil Majesty Flow, Clearfil Majesty ES Flow, Clearfil Majesty Posterior, Clearfil Photo Bright, Clearfil Photo Posterior, Clearfil Posterior 3, Clearfil F II
Micerium1Enamel Plus HFO, Enamel Plus HFO Flow, Enamel Plus HRi, Enamel Plus HRi Flow
Pulpdent0Flows-Rite
R&S0Nanofil, Suprafil
Saremco1Saremco microhybrid composite, els (extra low shrinkage)
Shofu0Beautifil II, Beautifil Flow, Beautifil Flow Plus
Southern Dental Industries (SDI)2Glacier, Ice, Rok, Wave (3 viscosities)
Sun Medical1Fantasista, Metafil CX, Metafil Flo
Tokuyama1Estelite Sigma Quick, Estelite Posterior, Estelite Asteria, Estelite Color, Estelite Flow Quick, Estelite Flow Quick High Flow, Palfique Estelite LV
Ultradent1Amelogen Plus, Permaflo, Permaflo DC
Voco2Admira, Admira Flow, Alfacomp LC, Amaris, Amaris Flow, Arabesk Flow, Arabesk, Arabesk Top, Grandio, Grandio Flow, Grandio SO, Grandio SO Flow, Grandio SO Heavy Flow, X-tra Base, X-tra fil
Table 3

List of the 12 monomers contained in the surveyed composite resins (CR) and their frequency of use (among the 130 CR whose composition was established).

Monomers Number of CR (%)
Bis-GMA 97 (74,6)
TEGDMA 79 (60, 8)
UDMA 68 (52,3)
Bis-EMA ou EBPADMA 28 (21,5)
Bis-MPEPP ou BPEDMA 10 (7,7)
HEDMA 4 (3,1)
PC Bis-GMA 3 (2,3)
TPPTMA 3 (2,3)
HEMA 2 (1,5)
Bis-DMA 1 (0,8)
4-MET 1 (0,8)
IBMA 1 (0,8)
Table 4

List of the composite resins that contain no bis-GMA, no BPA-derivative (with UDMA), or neither BPA-derivative nor UDMA.

Composite resins Manufacturers
Aelite FloBiscoWithout bis-GMA
Aelite Flo LVBisco
Alert*Jeneric Pentron
Quixfil TMDentsply
SDRDentsply
Venus Bulk FillHeraeus Kulzer
Venus Diamond flowHeraeus Kulzer
Estelite Flow QuickTokuyama
G-Aenial AnteriorGC
G-Aenial FlowGC
G-Aenial posteriorGC
G-Aenial Universal FloGC
KaloreGC
Aelite LS PackableBiscoWithout bis-GMA or BPA-derivative: resin composite with UDMA* with also TEGDMA
Clearfil Majesty ES Flow*Kuraray
Clearfil Majesty Flow*Kuraray
Fantasista*Sun Medical
Fusio*Jeneric Pentron
Gradia Direct (X)GC
Gradia Direct Flo*GC
Gradia Direct LoFlo*GC
Metafil CX*Sun Medical
Perfect FeelItena
Perfect Feel Flow*Itena
Renamel Microfill (+ superBrite)Cosmedent
Tetric*Ivoclar Vivadent
Venus DiamondHeraeus Kulzer
Venus PearlHeraeus Kulzer
Wave (3 viscosités)Southern Dental
Xtrem nanoApol
Filtek Silorane3MWithout BPA-derivative or UDMA
  30 in total

Review 1.  Bisphenol A and human health: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Johanna R Rochester
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.143

2.  Chapel Hill bisphenol A expert panel consensus statement: integration of mechanisms, effects in animals and potential to impact human health at current levels of exposure.

Authors:  Frederick S vom Saal; Benson T Akingbemi; Scott M Belcher; Linda S Birnbaum; D Andrew Crain; Marcus Eriksen; Francesca Farabollini; Louis J Guillette; Russ Hauser; Jerrold J Heindel; Shuk-Mei Ho; Patricia A Hunt; Taisen Iguchi; Susan Jobling; Jun Kanno; Ruth A Keri; Karen E Knudsen; Hans Laufer; Gerald A LeBlanc; Michele Marcus; John A McLachlan; John Peterson Myers; Angel Nadal; Retha R Newbold; Nicolas Olea; Gail S Prins; Catherine A Richter; Beverly S Rubin; Carlos Sonnenschein; Ana M Soto; Chris E Talsness; John G Vandenbergh; Laura N Vandenberg; Debby R Walser-Kuntz; Cheryl S Watson; Wade V Welshons; Yelena Wetherill; R Thomas Zoeller
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 3.  Bisphenol A and related compounds in dental materials.

Authors:  Abby F Fleisch; Perry E Sheffield; Courtney Chinn; Burton L Edelstein; Philip J Landrigan
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Changes in urinary bisphenol A concentrations associated with placement of dental composite restorations in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Nancy N Maserejian; Felicia L Trachtenberg; Olivia Brown Wheaton; Antonia M Calafat; Gayatri Ranganathan; Hae-Young Kim; Russ Hauser
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  Low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose-responses of endocrine disrupting chemicals: has the case been made?

Authors:  Lorenz R Rhomberg; Julie E Goodman
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  A systematic review of Bisphenol A "low dose" studies in the context of human exposure: a case for establishing standards for reporting "low-dose" effects of chemicals.

Authors:  Justin G Teeguarden; Sesha Hanson-Drury
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 6.023

Review 7.  In vivo effects of bisphenol A in laboratory rodent studies.

Authors:  Catherine A Richter; Linda S Birnbaum; Francesca Farabollini; Retha R Newbold; Beverly S Rubin; Chris E Talsness; John G Vandenbergh; Debby R Walser-Kuntz; Frederick S vom Saal
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 8.  In vitro molecular mechanisms of bisphenol A action.

Authors:  Yelena B Wetherill; Benson T Akingbemi; Jun Kanno; John A McLachlan; Angel Nadal; Carlos Sonnenschein; Cheryl S Watson; R Thomas Zoeller; Scott M Belcher
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 3.143

9.  Prenatal bisphenol A exposure and early childhood behavior.

Authors:  Joe M Braun; Kimberly Yolton; Kim N Dietrich; Richard Hornung; Xiaoyun Ye; Antonia M Calafat; Bruce P Lanphear
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  High bioavailability of bisphenol A from sublingual exposure.

Authors:  Véronique Gayrard; Marlène Z Lacroix; Séverine H Collet; Catherine Viguié; Alain Bousquet-Melou; Pierre-Louis Toutain; Nicole Picard-Hagen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  12 in total

1.  A Systematic Review of Exposure to Bisphenol A from Dental Treatment.

Authors:  T Marzouk; S Sathyanarayana; A S Kim; A L Seminario; C M McKinney
Journal:  JDR Clin Trans Res       Date:  2019-01-25

2.  Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems.

Authors:  Philippe Francois; Elsa Vennat; Stéphane Le Goff; Nathalie Ruscassier; Jean-Pierre Attal; Elisabeth Dursun
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  A Prospective Cohort Study of Bisphenol A Exposure from Dental Treatment.

Authors:  C M McKinney; B G Leroux; A L Seminario; A Kim; Z Liu; S Samy; S Sathyanarayana
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 4.  Bibliometric Analysis of the Toxicity of Bisphenol A.

Authors:  Mengmei Ni; Xiaomeng Li; Lishi Zhang; Vikas Kumar; Jinyao Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 5.  Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth.

Authors:  Helen V Worthington; Sara Khangura; Kelsey Seal; Monika Mierzwinski-Urban; Analia Veitz-Keenan; Philipp Sahrmann; Patrick Roger Schmidlin; Dell Davis; Zipporah Iheozor-Ejiofor; María Graciela Rasines Alcaraz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-13

Review 6.  Bisphenol A in dental materials - existence, leakage and biological effects.

Authors:  M Löfroth; M Ghasemimehr; A Falk; P Vult von Steyern
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-05-27

7.  Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior of Restorative, Orthodontic, and Pediatric Departments' Members toward Bisphenol A Dental Exposures.

Authors:  Sara M Bagher; Heba J Sabbagh; Mariam Aldajani; Nouf Al-Ghamdi; Ghufran Zaatari
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2019-02-14

8.  Bisphenol A Induces Accelerated Cell Aging in Murine Endothelium.

Authors:  Rafael Moreno-Gómez-Toledano; Sandra Sánchez-Esteban; Alberto Cook; Marta Mínguez-Moratinos; Rafael Ramírez-Carracedo; Paula Reventún; María Delgado-Marín; Ricardo J Bosch; Marta Saura
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-09-29

Review 9.  Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Environmental Toxicants: Epigenetics as an Underlying Mechanism.

Authors:  Nguyen Quoc Vuong Tran; Kunio Miyake
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.326

10.  Novel Urethane-Dimethacrylate Monomers and Compositions for Use as Matrices in Dental Restorative Materials.

Authors:  Izabela M Barszczewska-Rybarek; Marta W Chrószcz; Grzegorz Chladek
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.