Literature DB >> 30317399

Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems.

Philippe Francois1,2, Elsa Vennat3, Stéphane Le Goff1, Nathalie Ruscassier3, Jean-Pierre Attal1,4, Elisabeth Dursun5,6,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the shear bond strength (SBS) and interface between a resin composite and a new high-viscous glass ionomer cement (HV-GIC), a HV-GIC, a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RM-GIC), a bulk-fill flowable composite, and a regular flowable composite bonded with various adhesive systems. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A resin composite (Filtek Z350) was bonded to a new HV-GIC (EQUIA Forte Fil) using various adhesive systems, including a universal adhesive in self-etch and etch-and-rinse mode (Scotchbond Universal), a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Scotchbond 1-XT), a one-step self-etch adhesive (Optibond All-in-one) tested also after silane application (Monobond Plus), and a coating material (EQUIA Forte Coat). The resin composite was also bonded to a HV-GIC (Fuji IX GP), a RM-GIC (Fuji II LC), a bulk-fill flowable composite (SDR), and a regular flowable composite (Tetric Evo Flow) with the universal adhesive in self-etch mode (Scotchbond Universal). Two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test was used to investigate the difference in SBS. Failures were analyzed by chi-square test. Bonding interfaces were examined by environmental scanning electron microscopy (E-SEM).
RESULTS: SBS to EQUIA Forte Fil was significantly lower with Scotchbond 1-XT than with all other adhesive systems. By using Scotchbond Universal with the self-etch technique, the SBS to EQUIA Forte Fil was significantly higher than the SBS to Fuji IX GP and significantly lower than the SBS to Fuji II LC, SDR, and Tetric Evo Flow. E-SEM images showed an intimate contact at all interfaces examined.
CONCLUSION: EQUIA Forte Fil showed satisfactory SBS and interfaces with all adhesives tested. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Bonding between the resin composite and HV-GIC can be achieved using a universal adhesive in self-etch mode, an easy-to-use adhesive system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental scanning electron microscopy; High-viscous glass ionomer cement; Proximal box elevation; Sandwich technique; Shear bond strength; Universal adhesive

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30317399     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2678-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  50 in total

1.  Microtensile bond strengths of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cements to dentine using four conditioners.

Authors:  M Tanumiharja; M F Burrow; M J Tyas
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.

Authors:  S F Chuang; J K Liu; C C Chao; F P Liao; Y H Chen
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases.

Authors:  Didier Dietschi; Steven Olsburgh; Ivo Krejci; Carel Davidson
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.612

4.  Bond strengths between composite resin and auto cure glass ionomer cement using the co-cure technique.

Authors:  G M Knight; J M McIntyre
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.291

5.  Chemical interaction of phosphoric acid ester with hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  D Fukegawa; S Hayakawa; Y Yoshida; K Suzuki; A Osaka; B Van Meerbeek
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Elution study of unreacted Bis-GMA, TEGDMA, UDMA, and Bis-EMA from light-cured dental resins and resin composites using HPLC.

Authors:  Irini D Sideridou; Dimitris S Achilias
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.368

7.  Effect of water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  M A Cattani-Lorente; V Dupuis; J Payan; F Moya; J M Meyer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Surface treatment agent for dental metals using a thiirane monomer and a phosphoric acid monomer.

Authors:  Yoshinori Kadoma
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years.

Authors:  Ingrid E Andersson-Wenckert; Jan W V van Dijken; Catharina Kieri
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.522

10.  Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers.

Authors:  Y Yoshida; K Nagakane; R Fukuda; Y Nakayama; M Okazaki; H Shintani; S Inoue; Y Tagawa; K Suzuki; J De Munck; B Van Meerbeek
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.116

View more
  3 in total

1.  In vitro marginal and internal adaptation of four different base materials used to elevate proximal dentin gingival margins.

Authors:  Hoda S Ismail; Ashraf I Ali; Rabab El Mehesen; Franklin Garcia-Godoy; Salah H Mahmoud
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-07-01

2.  Effect of Saliva Contamination on Microleakage of Open Sandwich Restorations.

Authors:  Çiğdem Çelik; Yusuf Bayraktar; Behiye Esra Özdemir
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2020-09

Review 3.  Deep proximal margin rebuilding with direct esthetic restorations: a systematic review of marginal adaptation and bond strength.

Authors:  Hoda S Ismail; Ashraf I Ali; Rabab El Mehesen; Jelena Juloski; Franklin Garcia-Godoy; Salah H Mahmoud
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2022-03-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.