Literature DB >> 27708063

Mechanistic modeling of hemoglobin glycation and red blood cell kinetics enables personalized diabetes monitoring.

Roy Malka1, David M Nathan2, John M Higgins3.   

Abstract

The amount of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in diabetic patients' blood provides the best estimate of the average blood glucose concentration over the preceding 2 to 3 months. It is therefore essential for disease management and is the best predictor of disease complications. Nevertheless, substantial unexplained glucose-independent variation in HbA1c makes its reflection of average glucose inaccurate and limits the precision of medical care for diabetics. The true average glucose concentration of a nondiabetic and a poorly controlled diabetic may differ by less than 15 mg/dl, but patients with identical HbA1c values may have true average glucose concentrations that differ by more than 60 mg/dl. We combined a mechanistic mathematical model of hemoglobin glycation and red blood cell kinetics with large sets of within-patient glucose measurements to derive patient-specific estimates of nonglycemic determinants of HbA1c, including mean red blood cell age. We found that between-patient variation in derived mean red blood cell age explains all glucose-independent variation in HbA1c. We then used our model to personalize prospective estimates of average glucose and reduced errors by more than 50% in four independent groups of greater than 200 patients. The current standard of care provided average glucose estimates with errors >15 mg/dl for one in three patients. Our patient-specific method reduced this error rate to 1 in 10. Our personalized approach should improve medical care for diabetes using existing clinical measurements.
Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27708063      PMCID: PMC5714656          DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf9304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  45 in total

1.  Biological variation of glycohemoglobin.

Authors:  Curt Rohlfing; Hsiao-Mei Wiedmeyer; Randie Little; V Lee Grotz; Alethea Tennill; Jack England; Richard Madsen; David Goldstein
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  The relationship between fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c during intensive periods of glucose control in antidiabetic therapy.

Authors:  Amlan Barua; Jhankar Acharya; Saroj Ghaskadbi; Pranay Goel
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Physiological and pathological population dynamics of circulating human red blood cells.

Authors:  John M Higgins; L Mahadevan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Investigation of the mechanism underlying the variability of glycated haemoglobin in non-diabetic subjects not related to glycaemia.

Authors:  B J Gould; S J Davie; J S Yudkin
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1997-04-04       Impact factor: 3.786

5.  A bihormonal closed-loop artificial pancreas for type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Firas H El-Khatib; Steven J Russell; David M Nathan; Robert G Sutherlin; Edward R Damiano
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 17.956

6.  Hemoglobin glycation rate constant in non-diabetic Individuals.

Authors:  Piotr Ladyżyński; Jan M Wójcicki; Marianna I Bąk; Stanisława Sabalińska; Jerzy Kawiak; Piotr Foltyński; Janusz Krzymień; Waldemar Karnafel
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  High and low hemoglobin glycation phenotypes in type 1 diabetes: a challenge for interpretation of glycemic control.

Authors:  James M Hempe; Ricardo Gomez; Robert J McCarter; Stuart A Chalew
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.852

8.  Glucose levels and risk of dementia.

Authors:  Paul K Crane; Rod Walker; Rebecca A Hubbard; Ge Li; David M Nathan; Hui Zheng; Sebastien Haneuse; Suzanne Craft; Thomas J Montine; Steven E Kahn; Wayne McCormick; Susan M McCurry; James D Bowen; Eric B Larson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Lilly lecture 1989. Toward physiological understanding of glucose tolerance. Minimal-model approach.

Authors:  R N Bergman
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 9.461

10.  In vivo volume and hemoglobin dynamics of human red blood cells.

Authors:  Roy Malka; Francisco Feijó Delgado; Scott R Manalis; John M Higgins
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  26 in total

1.  The Fallacy of Average: How Using HbA1c Alone to Assess Glycemic Control Can Be Misleading.

Authors:  Roy W Beck; Crystal G Connor; Deborah M Mullen; David M Wesley; Richard M Bergenstal
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Labile haemoglobin as a glycaemic biomarker for patient-specific monitoring of diabetes: mathematical modelling approach.

Authors:  O León-Triana; G F Calvo; J Belmonte-Beitia; M Rosa Durán; J Escribano-Serrano; A Michan-Doña; V M Pérez-García
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Evaluating Interventions and Titrations Using Fasting Blood Glucose.

Authors:  James M Minor; Leslie M Rickey; Richard M Bergenstal
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-07-05

4.  Estimation of Hemoglobin A1c from Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: Is Time In Range All We Need?

Authors:  Chiara Fabris; Lutz Heinemann; Roy Beck; Claudio Cobelli; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  The Relationships Between Time in Range, Hyperglycemia Metrics, and HbA1c.

Authors:  Roy W Beck; Richard M Bergenstal; Peiyao Cheng; Craig Kollman; Anders L Carlson; Mary L Johnson; David Rodbard
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-13

6.  Hemoglobin A1c Accurately Predicts Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Average Glucose in Youth and Young Adults With Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Christine L Chan; Emma Hope; Jessica Thurston; Timothy Vigers; Laura Pyle; Philip S Zeitler; Kristen J Nadeau
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  A Review of Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Based Composite Metrics for Glycemic Control.

Authors:  Michelle Nguyen; Julia Han; Elias K Spanakis; Boris P Kovatchev; David C Klonoff
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Validation of Time in Range as an Outcome Measure for Diabetes Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Roy W Beck; Richard M Bergenstal; Tonya D Riddlesworth; Craig Kollman; Zhaomian Li; Adam S Brown; Kelly L Close
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Rationale and Design for a GRADE Substudy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Mary E Larkin; David M Nathan; Ionut Bebu; Heidi Krause-Steinrauf; William H Herman; John M Higgins; Margaret Tiktin; Robert M Cohen; Claire Lund; Richard M Bergenstal; Mary L Johnson; Valerie Arends
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.118

10.  A Kinetic Model for Glucose Levels and Hemoglobin A1c Provides a Novel Tool for Individualized Diabetes Management.

Authors:  Yongjin Xu; Timothy C Dunn; Ramzi A Ajjan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.