Mary E Larkin1, David M Nathan1, Ionut Bebu2, Heidi Krause-Steinrauf2, William H Herman3, John M Higgins4,5, Margaret Tiktin6, Robert M Cohen7, Claire Lund2, Richard M Bergenstal8, Mary L Johnson8, Valerie Arends9. 1. Massachusetts General Hospital Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. The Biostatistics Center, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute of Public Health, The George Washington University, Rockville, Maryland. 3. Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 4. Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Multidisciplinary Research, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. 7. Cincinnati VA Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio. 8. Health Partners Institute, International Diabetes Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 9. Advanced Research and Diagnostic Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Abstract
Background: The Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness (GRADE) study has enrolled a racially and ethnically diverse population with type 2 diabetes, performed extensive phenotyping, and randomly assigned the participants to one of four second-line diabetes medications. The continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) substudy has been added to determine whether there are racial/ethnic differences in the relationship between average glucose (AG) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). CGM will also be used to compare time in target range, glucose variability, and the frequency and duration of hypoglycemia across study groups. Methods: The observational CGM substudy will enroll up to 1800 of the 5047 GRADE study participants from the four treatment groups, including as many as 450 participants from each of 4 racial/ethnic minority groups to be compared: Hispanic White, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic African American, and non-Hispanic Other. CGM will be performed for 2 weeks in proximity to a GRADE annual visit, during which an oral glucose tolerance test will be performed and HbA1c and glycated albumin measured. Indicators of interindividual variation in red blood cell turnover, based on specialized erythrocyte measurements, will also be measured to explore the potential causes of interindividual HbA1c variations. Conclusions: The GRADE CGM substudy will provide new insights into whether differences exist in the relationship between HbA1c and AG among different racial/ethnic groups and whether glycemic profiles differ among frequently used diabetes medications and their potential clinical implications. Understanding such differences is important for clinical care and adjustment of diabetes medications in patients of different races or ethnicities.
Background: The Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness (GRADE) study has enrolled a racially and ethnically diverse population with type 2 diabetes, performed extensive phenotyping, and randomly assigned the participants to one of four second-line diabetes medications. The continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) substudy has been added to determine whether there are racial/ethnic differences in the relationship between average glucose (AG) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). CGM will also be used to compare time in target range, glucose variability, and the frequency and duration of hypoglycemia across study groups. Methods: The observational CGM substudy will enroll up to 1800 of the 5047 GRADE study participants from the four treatment groups, including as many as 450 participants from each of 4 racial/ethnic minority groups to be compared: Hispanic White, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic African American, and non-Hispanic Other. CGM will be performed for 2 weeks in proximity to a GRADE annual visit, during which an oral glucose tolerance test will be performed and HbA1c and glycated albumin measured. Indicators of interindividual variation in red blood cell turnover, based on specialized erythrocyte measurements, will also be measured to explore the potential causes of interindividual HbA1c variations. Conclusions: The GRADE CGM substudy will provide new insights into whether differences exist in the relationship between HbA1c and AG among different racial/ethnic groups and whether glycemic profiles differ among frequently used diabetes medications and their potential clinical implications. Understanding such differences is important for clinical care and adjustment of diabetes medications in patients of different races or ethnicities.
Entities:
Keywords:
Average glucose; Continuous glucose monitoring; Glycated hemoglobin; Interracial differences; Type 2 diabetes
Authors: Christopher J Lindsell; Robert S Franco; Eric P Smith; Clinton H Joiner; Robert M Cohen Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Stuart A Chalew; Robert J McCarter; Jacinta Thomas; Jessica L Thomson; James M Hempe Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Julienne K Kirk; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ronny A Bell; Leah V Passmore; Denise E Bonds; Andrew J Karter; K M Venkat Narayan Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Robert M Cohen; Robert S Franco; Paramjit K Khera; Eric P Smith; Christopher J Lindsell; Peter J Ciraolo; Mary B Palascak; Clinton H Joiner Journal: Blood Date: 2008-08-11 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: William H Herman; Yong Ma; Gabriel Uwaifo; Steven Haffner; Steven E Kahn; Edward S Horton; John M Lachin; Maria G Montez; Tina Brenneman; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-05-29 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Kasia J Lipska; Joseph S Ross; Yun Wang; Silvio E Inzucchi; Karl Minges; Andrew J Karter; Elbert S Huang; Mayur M Desai; Thomas M Gill; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Neda Rasouli; Naji Younes; Kristina M Utzschneider; Silvio E Inzucchi; Ashok Balasubramanyam; Andrea L Cherrington; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; Robert M Cohen; Darin E Olson; Ralph A DeFronzo; William H Herman; John M Lachin; Steven E Kahn Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 17.152