| Literature DB >> 27707808 |
Francesca Latronico1,2, Waleed Nasser3, Kai Puhakainen1,4, Jukka Ollgren1, Hanne-Leena Hyyryläinen1, Stephen B Beres3, Outi Lyytikäinen1, Jari Jalava1, James M Musser3, Jaana Vuopio1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many countries worldwide have reported increasing numbers of emm89 group A Streptococcus (GAS) infections during last decade. Pathogen genetic factors linked to this increase need assessment.Entities:
Keywords: Streptococcus pyogenes; bacteremia; bacterial genome; emm type; molecular epidemiology; surveillance; whole genome sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27707808 PMCID: PMC5142090 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiw468
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Infect Dis ISSN: 0022-1899 Impact factor: 5.226
Figure 1.Number of bacteremic group A Streptococcus (GAS) isolates (left axis) typed at the national reference laboratory and incidence of GAS bacteremia (right axis) in Finland, 2004–2014.
Figure 2.Emergence of emm89 group A Streptococcus (GAS) isolates among all bacteremic GAS isolates by tertiary care district in Finland, 2004–2014. emm89 proportions were calculated for each tertiary care district and for each year. The inset shows a map of Finland, with the 5 tertiary care districts in color.
Figure 3.emm89 bacteremic group A Streptococcus (GAS) isolates by clade, in Finland, 2004–2014.
Figure 4.emm89 bacteremic group A Streptococcus clade 3 subclades by year (A) and proportion (B), 2004–2014.
Number of Deaths, Case-Fatality Rates, and Estimated Age-Adjusted Odds of Death Due to emm89 Clade 3 Subclades for 7-Day and 30-Day Follow-up Periods
| Subclade | Cases, No. | 7-day Follow-up | 30-day Follow-up | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deaths, No. | CFR, % | OR (95% CI) | Deaths, No. | CFR, % | OR (95% CI) | ||||
| A | 74 | 0 | 0 | Reference | 2 | 3 | Reference | ||
| B | 41 | 4 | 10 | 10.5 (1.28–∞) | .03 | 5 | 12 | 5.5 (.83–61.0) | .08 |
| C | 14 | 2 | 14 | 12.8 (.97–∞) | .05 | 2 | 14 | 5.2 (.34–80.0) | .28 |
| D | 32 | 4 | 13 | 12.4 (1.49–∞) | .02 | 6 | 19 | 7.2 (1.2–77.7) | .03 |
| E | 46 | 2 | 4 | 4.0 (.32–∞) | .30 | 3 | 7 | 2.7 (.30–34.0) | .51 |
| F | 48 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 (0–∞) | … | 2 | 4 | 1.8 (.12–25.9) | .92 |
Abbreviations: CFR, case-fatality rate; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Figure 5.Specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay to detect clade 3 subclade D strains. A, Schematic showing the emm89 clade 3 region of difference. B, Agarose gel elecrophoresis of findings of the specific PCR assay to detect clade 3 subclade D strains. Lane 1, 100-bp DNA ladder; lane 2, subclade D; lanes 3–6, other subclades; lane 7, subclade D; lane 8, other subclade; lane 9, subclade D; lane 10, other subclade; lane 11, subclade D; lanes 12–13, other subclades; lane 14, 100-bp DNA ladder.