Literature DB >> 27705892

Sapien 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Moderate or Without Predilation.

Yigal Abramowitz1, Hasan Jilaihawi, Tarun Chakravarty, Yoshio Maeno, Hiroyuki Kawamori, Yoshio Kazuno, Geeteshwar Mangat, Tanya Rami, Zev Allison, David Anderson, Larry Chan, Wen Cheng, Raj R Makkar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve preparation with balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has been previously considered mandatory during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures. BAV-inherent risks including stroke, conduction abnormalities, and reduced device profile size established the rationale for safe valve deployment without the need for aggressive valve preparation. We investigate the feasibility and safety of performing Sapien 3 (S3; Edwards Lifesciences) balloon-expandable TAVI with moderate or without predilation (PD).
METHODS: We examined consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent S3-TAVI at our institution. Overall, 119 patients underwent TAVI without PD and 126 with moderate PD (mean valvuloplasty balloon diameter, 15.3 ± 2.1 mm). TAVI endpoints and adverse events were considered according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 definitions.
RESULTS: Device success for the entire cohort was 98.8%. PD rates were similar between groups. Total fluoroscopy time and amount of contrast used were lower in the no PD group (13 min vs 16.2 min [P<.001] and 71.3 mL vs 81 mL [P=.03], respectively). All-cause mortality up to 30 days was 0% (0/119) in the no PD group vs 1.6% (2/126) in the moderate PD group (P=.49). VARC-2 defined complication rates at 30 days including cerebrovascular accident were similar between groups. Overall, there was no significant difference in survival rate between both groups (hazard ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-16.2; P=.09).
CONCLUSIONS: Balloon-expandable TAVI using the S3 device with moderate or without balloon PD is feasible and safe. Omission of PD in appropriate cases was associated with reduced fluoroscopy time and total contrast used without affecting procedural success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27705892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol        ISSN: 1042-3931            Impact factor:   2.022


  5 in total

Review 1.  Pre-implantation balloon-aortic valvuloplasty before transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is this still needed?

Authors:  Rafail A Kotronias; Michael Teitelbaum; Rodrigo Bagur
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Predilatation Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Is it Still a Prerequisite?

Authors:  Matteo Pagnesi; Luca Baldetti; Paolo Del Sole; Antonio Mangieri; Marco B Ancona; Damiano Regazzoli; Nicola Buzzatti; Francesco Giannini; Antonio Colombo; Azeem Latib
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-09

3.  Overcoming the transcatheter aortic valve replacement Achilles heel: conduction abnormalities-a systematic review.

Authors:  Alberto Alperi; Guillem Muntané-Carol; Afonso B Freitas-Ferraz; Lucia Junquera; David Del Val; Laurent Faroux; François Philippon; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-11

4.  Routine Predeployment Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Time to Move On?

Authors:  Marie-France Poulin; Clifford J Kavinsky
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  The use of semi-compliant versus non-compliant balloon systems for predilatation during the implantation of self-expandable transcatheter aortic valves: Data from the VIenna CardioThOracic Aortic Valve RegistrY (VICTORY).

Authors:  Markus Mach; Philipp Szalkiewicz; Thomas Poschner; Waseem Hasan; Martin Andreas; Bernhard Winkler; Ena Hasimbegovic; Theresia Steinkellner; Andreas Strouhal; Christopher Adlbrecht; Georg Delle-Karth; Martin Grabenwöger
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.686

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.