| Literature DB >> 29588739 |
Matteo Pagnesi1, Luca Baldetti1, Paolo Del Sole1, Antonio Mangieri1, Marco B Ancona1, Damiano Regazzoli1, Nicola Buzzatti2, Francesco Giannini1, Antonio Colombo1,3, Azeem Latib1.
Abstract
Predilatation has been historically considered a mandatory step before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) since it facilitates valve crossing and prosthesis delivery, ensures optimal valve expansion and improves hemodynamic stability during valve deployment. However, as a result of procedural evolution over time, direct TAVI (without pre-implantation balloon aortic valvuloplasty) has emerged as an interesting option to simplify the procedure and to avoid potential valvuloplasty-related complications. Several real-world retrospective studies and one small randomised study have shown that direct TAVI (with both self-expanding and balloon-expandable prostheses) is feasible, safe and associated with outcomes similar to standard TAVI with pre-implantation balloon aortic valvuloplasty. In the absence of high-quality, robust evidence, the current review aims to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of omitting predilatation prior to TAVI.Entities:
Keywords: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation; aortic valve calcification; balloon aortic valvuloplasty; cerebral embolic risk; direct transcatheter aortic valve implantation; paravalvular leakage; permanent pacemaker; postdilatation; predilatation
Year: 2017 PMID: 29588739 PMCID: PMC5808664 DOI: 10.15420/icr.2017:17:2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interv Cardiol ISSN: 1756-1485