Literature DB >> 27704647

An investigation of the emotion of disgust as an affective barrier to intention to screen for colorectal cancer.

M Davis1, M Oaten1, S Occhipinti1, S K Chambers1, R J Stevenson2.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation remains unacceptably low. This study investigated the emotion of disgust as a potential deterrent to intention to screen for CRC. The study utilised a convenience sample of individuals' 40-70 years of age to complete an online survey. Participants included 30 men and 118 women recruited between December 1, 2013 and March 31, 2014. Data on socio-demographics, health status, screening intentions and emotional barriers to bowel screening were collected via an on-line survey. Logistic regression analysis was utilised to investigate predictors of screening intention. Individuals were more likely to report intention to screen if they had prior screening experience, and reported fewer emotional concerns to screening for CRC. Results implicate disgust as a predictor of screening avoidance among participants. Specifically, higher reported faecal disgust was predictive of a 3% decrease in screening intention. This study was the first to empirically position disgust alongside other negative emotional states as an affective barrier to screening for CRC. Trait disgust sensitivity was not a reliable predictor of screening intention. This research suggests that anticipated faecal disgust may contribute to avoidance of screening for CRC.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer; disgust; disgust sensitivity; screening; screening intention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27704647     DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  7 in total

1.  Early Colorectal Cancer Detected by Machine Learning Model Using Gender, Age, and Complete Blood Count Data.

Authors:  Mark C Hornbrook; Ran Goshen; Eran Choman; Maureen O'Keeffe-Rosetti; Yaron Kinar; Elizabeth G Liles; Kristal C Rust
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Uptake of the English Bowel (Colorectal) Cancer Screening Programme: an update 5 years after the full roll-out.

Authors:  Yasemin Hirst; Sandro Stoffel; Gianluca Baio; Lesley McGregor; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Assessing emotions conveyed and elicited by patient narratives and their impact on intention to participate in colorectal cancer screening: A psychophysiological investigation.

Authors:  Teresa Gavaruzzi; Michela Sarlo; Francesca Giandomenico; Rino Rumiati; Francesca Polato; Franca De Lazzari; Lorella Lotto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Financial Literacy, Financial Education, and Cancer Screening Behavior: Evidence from Japan.

Authors:  Trinh Xuan Thi Nguyen; Sumeet Lal; Sulemana Abdul-Salam; Mostafa Saidur Rahim Khan; Yoshihiko Kadoya
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Financial incentives to increase stool collection rates for microbiome studies in adult bone marrow transplant patients.

Authors:  Jillian C Thompson; Yi Ren; Kristi Romero; Meagan Lew; Amy T Bush; Julia A Messina; Sin-Ho Jung; Sharareh Siamakpour-Reihani; Julie Miller; Robert R Jenq; Jonathan U Peled; Marcel R M van den Brink; Nelson J Chao; Mark G Shrime; Anthony D Sung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Recommend or not? The influence of emotions on passengers' intention of airline recommendation during COVID-19.

Authors:  Xi Wang; Jie Zheng; Liang Rebecca Tang; Yi Luo
Journal:  Tour Manag       Date:  2022-10-11

7.  Emotional predictors of bowel screening: the avoidance-promoting role of fear, embarrassment, and disgust.

Authors:  Lisa M Reynolds; Ian P Bissett; Nathan S Consedine
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.