Kazuaki Okawa1, Misa Ohno1, Akinori Kashimura1, Masahiro Kimura1, Yuki Kobayashi1, Masayoshi Sakaguchi1, Yasusato Sugahara1, Minori Kamaya2, Yoshihiro Kino3, Peter O Bauer4, Fumitaka Oyama5. 1. Department of Chemistry and Life Science, Kogakuin University, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Department of Applied Chemistry, Kogakuin University, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Department of Bioinformatics and Molecular Neuropathology, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Kiyose, Tokyo, Japan. 4. Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL. 5. Department of Chemistry and Life Science, Kogakuin University, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan f-oyama@cc.kogakuin.ac.jp.
Abstract
Acidic mammalian chitinase (AMCase) is implicated in asthma, allergic inflammation, and food processing. Little is known about genetic and evolutional regulation of chitinolytic activity of AMCase. Here, we relate human AMCase polymorphisms to the mouse AMCase, and show that the highly active variants encoded by nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) are consistent with the mouse AMCase sequence. The chitinolytic activity of the recombinant human AMCase was significantly lower than that of the mouse counterpart. By creating mouse-human chimeric AMCase protein we found that the presence of the N-terminal region of human AMCase containing conserved active site residues reduced the enzymatic activity of the molecule. We were able to significantly increase the activity of human AMCase by amino acid substitutions encoded by nsSNPs (N45, D47, and R61) with those conserved in the mouse homologue (D45, N47, and M61). For abolition of the mouse AMCase activity, introduction of M61R mutation was sufficient. M61 is conserved in most of primates other than human and orangutan as well as in other mammals. Orangutan has I61 substitution, which also markedly reduced the activity of the mouse AMCase, indicating that the M61 is a crucial residue for the chitinolytic activity. Altogether, our data suggest that human AMCase has lost its chitinolytic activity by integration of nsSNPs during evolution and that the enzyme can be reactivated by introducing amino acids conserved in the mouse counterpart.
Acidic mammalian chitinase (AMCase) is implicated in asthma, allergic inflammation, and food processing. Little is known about genetic and evolutional regulation of chitinolytic activity of AMCase. Here, we relate humanAMCase polymorphisms to the mouseAMCase, and show that the highly active variants encoded by nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) are consistent with the mouseAMCase sequence. The chitinolytic activity of the recombinant humanAMCase was significantly lower than that of the mouse counterpart. By creating mouse-human chimeric AMCase protein we found that the presence of the N-terminal region of humanAMCase containing conserved active site residues reduced the enzymatic activity of the molecule. We were able to significantly increase the activity of humanAMCase by amino acid substitutions encoded by nsSNPs (N45, D47, and R61) with those conserved in the mouse homologue (D45, N47, and M61). For abolition of the mouseAMCase activity, introduction of M61R mutation was sufficient. M61 is conserved in most of primates other than human and orangutan as well as in other mammals. Orangutan has I61 substitution, which also markedly reduced the activity of the mouseAMCase, indicating that the M61 is a crucial residue for the chitinolytic activity. Altogether, our data suggest that humanAMCase has lost its chitinolytic activity by integration of nsSNPs during evolution and that the enzyme can be reactivated by introducing amino acids conserved in the mouse counterpart.
Chitin, a linear β-1, 4-linked polymer of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc), is one of the most abundant carbohydrate polymers in nature and it is a major component of fungal cell walls and exoskeletons of invertebrates (Aam et al. 2010; Khoushab and Yamabhai 2010).Despite the absence of endogenous chitin, humans and mice express two active chitinases, chitotriosidase (Chit1) and acidic mammalian chitinase (AMCase) (Renkema et al. 1995; Boot et al. 2001; Lee et al. 2011; Bueter et al. 2013). First human chitinase, Chit1, was identified in Gaucher diseasepatients (Hollak et al. 1994; Renkema et al. 1995). AMCase, encoded by the CHIA gene, was the second discovered mammalian chitinase and was named for its acidic isoelectric point (Boot et al. 2001).AMCase has attracted considerable attention due to its increased expression under specific pathological conditions. For example, significant increases in AMCase mRNA and protein levels were detected in an induced asthmamouse model (Zhu et al. 2004) as well as in antigen-induced mouse models of allergic lung inflammation (Reese et al. 2007). In humans, AMCase has been shown to be increased in lungs of allergen-exposed patients with asthma and in alveolar macrophages in cases of fatal asthma (Zhu et al. 2004). AMCase is highly expressed in mouse stomach. A robust peak of activity was observed at pH 2.0, suggesting that AMCase can function as a digestive enzyme that breaks down chitin also as part of the host defense against chitin-containing pathogens in the gastric contents (Boot et al. 2001; Ohno et al. 2012, 2013; Kashimura et al. 2015).Multiple AMCase variants have been identified based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and associated with asthma risk in humans (Bierbaum et al. 2005; Chatterjee et al. 2008). Seibold et al. (2009) described nonsynonymous SNPs (nsSNPs) that variably endowed isoforms of humanAMCase with differential enzymatic activity and showed that a haplotype encoding an isoform of AMCase with heightened enzyme activity was associated with protection from asthma in humans. No detailed knowledge is available regarding genetic and evolutional regulation of chitinolytic activity of AMCase.In this study, we show that chitinolytic activity of humanAMCase is significantly lower than that of the mouse counterpart and investigate the chitinolytic activity of naturally occurring humanAMCase variants encoded by nsSNPs. We relate these polymorphisms to the active mouseAMCase, and show that the highly active variants contain SNPs consistent with the mouseAMCase sequence.
Results
Chitinolytic Activity of Human AMCase Is Significantly Lower than That of the Mouse AMCase
We expressed mouse and humanAMCase in the periplasmic space of E. coli as a fusion protein containing Staphylococcus aureus Protein A and V5-His tag (Kashimura et al. 2013) as described in the “Materials and Methods” section (fig. 1; supplementary figure S1, Supplementary Material online). To compare the chitin hydrolytic activities of these recombinant proteins, we used 4-methylumbelliferyl (4-MU) N,N’-diacetyl-β-D-chitobioside and colloidal chitin, a fluorogenic and a high molecular weight substrate, respectively.
F
Chitinolytic activity of human AMCase is significantly lower as compared with mouse AMCase. (A) Schematic representation of E. coli-expressed mouse and human AMCase fusion proteins. (B) Western blot analysis of the recombinant proteins using anti-V5 antibody. Arrow highlights the positions of the fusion proteins (Protein A-AMCase-V5-His). (C) Comparison of the chitinolytic activities of mouse and human AMCase proteins using fluorogenic substrate. The values represent actual scale (upper panels) and log scale (lower panels). Error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation from a single experiment conducted in triplicate. (D) Degradation products of colloidal chitin by mouse and human AMCase proteins. Chitin fragments generated by the recombinant proteins were analyzed by fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis. Chitin oligomers are shown in the left margin as standards. Both recombinant proteins released mainly (GlcNAc)2 fragments (highlighted with the arrow).
Chitinolytic activity of humanAMCase is significantly lower as compared with mouseAMCase. (A) Schematic representation of E. coli-expressed mouse and humanAMCase fusion proteins. (B) Western blot analysis of the recombinant proteins using anti-V5 antibody. Arrow highlights the positions of the fusion proteins (Protein A-AMCase-V5-His). (C) Comparison of the chitinolytic activities of mouse and humanAMCase proteins using fluorogenic substrate. The values represent actual scale (upper panels) and log scale (lower panels). Error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation from a single experiment conducted in triplicate. (D) Degradation products of colloidal chitin by mouse and humanAMCase proteins. Chitin fragments generated by the recombinant proteins were analyzed by fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis. Chitin oligomers are shown in the left margin as standards. Both recombinant proteins released mainly (GlcNAc)2 fragments (highlighted with the arrow).Consistently with previous reports, recombinant mouseAMCase had the highest activity at pH 2.0 (Boot et al. 2001; Kashimura et al. 2013), whereas the recombinant humanAMCase was most active at around pH 4.0–5.0 (Chou et al. 2006; Seibold et al. 2009; Goedken et al. 2011) with the human enzyme being significantly less active as compared with the mouseAMCase (fig. 1; supplementary table S1_1 and S1_2, Supplementary Material online; P < 0.01). The chitinolytic activity of the humanAMCase was 1/75 and 1/11 of that of the mouseAMCase at pH 2.0 and at pH 4.0, respectively (supplementary table S1_1, Supplementary Material online), which were essentially consistent with previous reports (Goedken et al. 2011). HumanAMCase was able to degrade the colloidal chitin producing primarily N,N′-diacetylchitobiose [(GlcNAc)2] fragments at pH 2.0, however its hydrolyzing activity was significantly lower than that of the mouseAMCase (fig. 1; supplementary table S1_3, Supplementary Material online). There was no significant difference in the chitinolytic activities of the recombinant proteins analyzed by a fluorogenic substrate of 4-MU N,N′-diacetyl-β-D-chitobioside and colloidal chitin using fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (supplementary table S1_2 and S1_3, Supplementary Material online).
N-Terminal Region in Human AMCase Reduces Chitinolytic Activity
Although human and mouseAMCase proteins share 82% sequence identity and 86% sequence similarity (Boot et al. 2001), these two homologues significantly differ with respect to their enzymatic activities (fig. 1; supplementary table S1, Supplementary Material online). To determine regions responsible for the reduced chitinolytic activity in humanAMCase, we expressed chimeric human–mouseAMCase proteins in E. coli (fig. 2; supplementary fig. S2 and supplementary table S2, Supplementary Material online) and examined the influence of the catalytic domain (CatD) and the chitin-binding domain (CBD). Chimeras C1, C2, and C3, which all contained mouse N-terminal region, exhibited strong chitinolytic activity toward the fluorogenic substrate comparable to mouseAMCase, however the activity was dropping with increasing content of humanAMCase sequence (fig. 2; supplementary table S2_1, Supplementary Material online; P < 0.01). In contrast, the chitinolytic activities were very low in chimeras C4, C5, and C6 as compared with mouseAMCase (fig. 2; supplementary table S2_1, Supplementary Material online; P < 0.01) and similar to that of the human enzyme (fig. 2; supplementary table S2_1, Supplementary Material online; P < 0.01). Although each of the chimeric proteins released mainly (GlcNAc)2 fragments from colloidal chitin at pH 2.0, chimeras C4, C5, and C6 and humanAMCase produced these fragments at very low levels (fig. 2; supplementary table S2_2, Supplementary Material online). Thus, the N-terminal region with conserved active site amino acid residues in humanAMCase significantly reduced chitinolytic activity.
F
Presence of N-terminal region derived from human AMCase containing active center significantly reduced the chitinolytic activity of chimeric enzymes. (A) Schematic representation of E. coli-expressed AMCase chimeric proteins. The amino acid sequences are color coded as follows: pink, mouse sequence; blue, human sequence. (B) Western blot analysis of the expressed AMCase chimeric proteins as described in figure 1. (C) Comparison of the chitinolytic properties of chimeric proteins with mouse and human AMCase in figure 1. (D) Degradation products of colloidal chitin by mouse AMCase, human AMCase, and six AMCase chimeric proteins.
Presence of N-terminal region derived from humanAMCase containing active center significantly reduced the chitinolytic activity of chimeric enzymes. (A) Schematic representation of E. coli-expressed AMCase chimeric proteins. The amino acid sequences are color coded as follows: pink, mouse sequence; blue, human sequence. (B) Western blot analysis of the expressed AMCase chimeric proteins as described in figure 1. (C) Comparison of the chitinolytic properties of chimeric proteins with mouse and humanAMCase in figure 1. (D) Degradation products of colloidal chitin by mouseAMCase, humanAMCase, and six AMCase chimeric proteins.
Chitinolytic Activity of Human AMCase Is Controlled by Amino Acid Substitutions
Eight nsSNPs including three novel variants [A290G (N45D), G296A (D47N), and G339T (R61M)] near the area coding for the enzyme active site have been identified (Seibold et al. 2009). We constructed three naturally occurring variants (A, B, and C) and one artificial protein variant (C/B) to examine the effect of six of these polymorphisms present in the catalytic domain and/or hinge region on the chitinolytic activity of the humanAMCase (fig. 3; supplementary fig. S3, Supplementary Material online). In variant A, all substituted amino acids differ from those in mouseAMCase (fig. 3; supplementary fig. S3, Supplementary Material online). Variant B corresponds to the so-called “wild-type” (WT) humanAMCase described in previous reports (Boot et al. 2001; Chou et al. 2006; Seibold et al. 2009). In contrast to variants A and B, three amino acid substitutions of the N-terminal region in variant C are in agreement with the mouse homologue (fig. 3; supplementary fig. S3, Supplementary Material online). Additionally, we constructed variant C/B with the N- and C-terminal regions consistent with variants C and B, respectively (fig. 3; supplementary fig. S3, Supplementary Material online).
F
Chitinolytic activity of human AMCase can be controlled by amino acid substitutions. (A) Schematic representation of E. coli-expressed human AMCase variants. Human AMCase amino acid substitutions, which are not conserved in the mouse counterpart are shown in blue. The amino acid substitutions conserved in the mouse counterpart are shown in pink. (B) Western blot analysis of tested recombinant AMCase variants. (C) Comparison of the chitinolytic activities of human AMCase variants with mouse AMCase as described in figure 1. (D) Degradation products of colloidal chitin by human AMCase variants and mouse AMCase. A, variant A; B, variant B; C, variant C; C/B, variant C/B; Mus, mouse.
Chitinolytic activity of humanAMCase can be controlled by amino acid substitutions. (A) Schematic representation of E. coli-expressed humanAMCase variants. HumanAMCase amino acid substitutions, which are not conserved in the mouse counterpart are shown in blue. The amino acid substitutions conserved in the mouse counterpart are shown in pink. (B) Western blot analysis of tested recombinant AMCase variants. (C) Comparison of the chitinolytic activities of humanAMCase variants with mouseAMCase as described in figure 1. (D) Degradation products of colloidal chitin by humanAMCase variants and mouseAMCase. A, variant A; B, variant B; C, variant C; C/B, variant C/B; Mus, mouse.Chitinolytic activity of variant A was much lower than that of the mouseAMCase (fig. 3; supplementary table S3_1, Supplementary Material online; P < 0.01). The activity of variant B (WT humanAMCase) was approximately 5-fold higher than that of variant A and variant C had about 100- and 20-fold higher activity than variant A and B, respectively (fig. 3; supplementary table S3_1, Supplementary Material online; P < 0.01). In addition, optimal pH for variants A and B was at around pH 4.0–5.0, whereas variant C showed highest chitinolytic activity at pH 2.0 (fig. 3; supplementary table S3_1, Supplementary Material online). Surprisingly, the activity of variant C/B was substantially higher and reached the level of the mouseAMCase at pH 2.0 (fig. 3; supplementary table S3_1, Supplementary Material online). Although each of the human variants released primarily (GlcNAc)2 fragments from the colloidal chitin at pH 2.0, variant A produced very low amounts of these fragments whereas variant C/B had equal activity as the mouseAMCase (fig. 3; supplementary table S3_2, Supplementary Material online). Thus, amino acid substitutions encoded by nsSNPs at the N-terminal region in humanAMCase had distinct effects on the chitinolytic activity and we were able to reactivate the humanAMCase by introducing three residues (N45D, D47N, and R61M), which were conserved in the mouse homologue (fig. 3).
Inactivation of Mouse AMCase by Introducing M61R Mutation
We next attempted to dissect the effect of three amino acid substitutions at the N-terminal region on the chitinolytic activity of mouseAMCase. Amino acid residues in WT mouseAMCase are D45, N47, and M61 (we named this type DNM) in the N-terminal region (fig. 4). We constructed mutant mouseAMCase proteins named NDM (N45,
D47, and M61), DNR (D45, N47, and R61), and NDR (N45, D47, and R61) (underlined are mutated amino acids; fig. 4). The chitinolytic activity of NDM was at the same level as that of the WT mouseAMCase (DNM) (fig. 4; supplementary table S4_1, Supplementary Material online). In contrast, the activities of DNR and NDR were significantly lower than that of the WT mouseAMCase and comparable to the WT (variant B) human enzyme (fig. 4; supplementary table S4_1, Supplementary Material online; P < 0.01). Both DNR and NDR mutants produced very low amounts of (GlcNAc)2 fragments whereas the NDM mutant had equal activity as the WT mouseAMCase (fig. 4; supplementary table S4_2, Supplementary Material online). Thus, D45N and N47D substitution have low effects, whereas M61R substitution found in humanAMCase has a crucial role in the activity of the enzyme.
F
Inactivation of mouse AMCase by introducing M61R mutation. (A) Schematic representation of WT (DNM) and mutant proteins (NDM, DNR, and NDR) mouse AMCase. Western blot analysis of the recombinant AMCase variants (B), comparison of the chitinolytic activities of mouse AMCase mutants (C) and degradation products of colloidal chitin by mouse AMCase mutants (D) were carried out as described in figure 1.
Inactivation of mouseAMCase by introducing M61R mutation. (A) Schematic representation of WT (DNM) and mutant proteins (NDM, DNR, and NDR) mouseAMCase. Western blot analysis of the recombinant AMCase variants (B), comparison of the chitinolytic activities of mouseAMCase mutants (C) and degradation products of colloidal chitin by mouseAMCase mutants (D) were carried out as described in figure 1.
M61 Is the Crucial Residue for High Chitinolytic Activity
We further examine the amino acid at the position 61 at the N-terminal region of AMCase in New World monkeys, Old World monkeys, and hominoids as well as distantly related mammals. M61 is conserved in mammals as well as in most primates other than orangutan (Pongo abelii) and human (fig. 5; supplementary table S5_1, Supplementary Material online). Orangutan and human have M61I and M61R substitutions, respectively.
F
M61 is a crucial residue for high chitinolytic activity. (A) Alignments of the amino acid at position 61 in New World monkeys, Old World monkeys, and hominoids as well as distal mammals. M61 is conserved in mammals as well as in most primates other than Orangutan and human. Orangutan has M61I substitution, whereas human WT AMCase is M61R. Red diamond indicates the amino acid at the position 61. (B) Schematic representation of WT (M61) and mutant (I61 and R61) mouse AMCase proteins. Western blot analysis of the recombinant mouse AMCase proteins (C), comparison of the chitinolytic activities of mouse WT and mutant AMCase proteins (D), degradation products of colloidal chitin by mouse AMCase mutants (E) were carried out as described in figure 1.
M61 is a crucial residue for high chitinolytic activity. (A) Alignments of the amino acid at position 61 in New World monkeys, Old World monkeys, and hominoids as well as distal mammals. M61 is conserved in mammals as well as in most primates other than Orangutan and human. Orangutan has M61I substitution, whereas human WT AMCase is M61R. Red diamond indicates the amino acid at the position 61. (B) Schematic representation of WT (M61) and mutant (I61 and R61) mouseAMCase proteins. Western blot analysis of the recombinant mouseAMCase proteins (C), comparison of the chitinolytic activities of mouse WT and mutant AMCase proteins (D), degradation products of colloidal chitin by mouseAMCase mutants (E) were carried out as described in figure 1.We next examined the effect of the M61I substitution on the chitinolytic activity of WT mouseAMCase. We constructed mutant mouseAMCase proteins named I61 (DNI, orangutan) and R61 (DNR, human) as well as M61 (DNM, WT mouseAMCase). Chitinolytic activities of I61 and R61 were significantly lower when compared with that of the WT mouseAMCase (fig. 5; supplementary table S5_2 and S5_3, Supplementary Material online). Thus, both M61R and M61I substitutions have major effects on the whole enzyme activity. Based on these results, we concluded that the M61R mutation is specific for humans and that Methionine at this position (M61) is the crucial residue for high chitinolytic activity.
Evolutionary Analysis of AMCase in Hominoidea
As shown above, M61R nonsynonymous substitution resulted in a significant reduction of chitinolytic activity of the human enzyme. As the WT humanAMCase has lost the function, an excess of nonsynonymous mutations in the gene is anticipated due to the relaxation of functional constraint. We compared the ratio of nonsynonymous substitutions to synonymous substitutions (dN/dS) in humans and other hominoidea.To examine the evolutionary history of AMCase genes, we constructed a phylogeny and calculated dN/dS ratio using calculator PAML (Xu and Yang 2013). When we compared the dN/dS ratio in hominoidea, the value of humanAMCase was 3.04, indicating that humanAMCase underwent natural selection (Darwinian selection) (fig. 6). It is interesting to note that AMCase is undergoing purifying selection in other hominoidea.
F
Evolutionary analysis of AMCase. (A) Human AMCase is undergoing natural selection. Phylogenetic tree was constructed by the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA). Rate ratios of nonsynonymous-to-synonymous substitutions dN/dS (ω) were calculated by PAMLX and indicated (shown below the species name). (B) Loss and gain of chitinolytic activity by amino acid substitutions in human AMCase. Human AMCase variants were defined by single nucleotide polymorphisms. The chitinolytic activity of these variants depended on location and pattern of the amino acid substitutions. The chitinolytic activity in human AMCase can be recovered by the combination of the N-terminal sequence of variant C and the C-terminal region of variant B. Resulting novel variant C/B had high specific activity comparable with the mouse homologue.
Evolutionary analysis of AMCase. (A) HumanAMCase is undergoing natural selection. Phylogenetic tree was constructed by the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA). Rate ratios of nonsynonymous-to-synonymous substitutions dN/dS (ω) were calculated by PAMLX and indicated (shown below the species name). (B) Loss and gain of chitinolytic activity by amino acid substitutions in humanAMCase. HumanAMCase variants were defined by single nucleotide polymorphisms. The chitinolytic activity of these variants depended on location and pattern of the amino acid substitutions. The chitinolytic activity in humanAMCase can be recovered by the combination of the N-terminal sequence of variant C and the C-terminal region of variant B. Resulting novel variant C/B had high specific activity comparable with the mouse homologue.
Discussion
In this study, we investigated chitinolytic activity of naturally occurring humanAMCase variants encoded by nsSNPs. The activity of the human enzyme was significantly reduced by specific amino acids that are not present in the mouseAMCase. Variants A and B (fig. 3) could be considered as the enzyme isoforms whose activities have been lost by the amino acid substitutions. Thus, one could hypothesize that humanAMCase became an inactive pseudogene during the course of evolution (fig. 6, lower part). This assumption is supported by a comparison with primates as well as distantly related mammals (fig. 5; supplementary table S5_1, Supplementary Material online). Pseudogenization is a genomic evolutionary phenomenon which has been thought to provide opportunities for phenotypic adaptations by gene function loss (Wang et al. 2006).As shown in fig. 6, only humanAMCase showed the high dN/dS ratio, whereas the evolutionary event of the AMCase gene in other hominoidea is close to be neutral. Thus, humanAMCase is likely to be a novel gene undergoing loss of function during the course of evolution, providing an opportunity for some unknown phenotypic adaptation. In addition to the reduced chitinolytic activity of humanAMCase, the expression level of AMCase mRNA and its product were relatively low in the human stomach when compared with that in mouse (Ohno et al. 2013). Since modern humans do not consume a significant amount of chitin-containing foods, this is not unexpected. Many stomach diseases are associated with infection by exogenous organisms. The severity of gastritis-associated infections such as Helicobacter pylori may correlate with the activity of endogenous enzymes (Cozzarini et al. 2009; Nookaew et al. 2013). It thus remains to be determined whether the low level of chitinolytic activity of AMCase in the human stomach participates in the response to gastric disorders.Biochemical data presented in this report for WT humanAMCase expressed in E. coli was essentially similar to the previous work by Seibold et al. expressed in insect cells (Seibold et al. 2009) and Goedken et al. (2011) in COS cells. These results indicate that our recombinant proteins recapitulate key biochemical features of AMCase that were obtained from different sources in the previous studies and would validate the use of E coli-expressed AMCase proteins in the subsequent chimeric and mutational analyses.Seibold et al. (2009) already identified eight nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms including three novel variants (A290G, G296A, and G339T) near the gene area coding for the enzyme active site and showed that the AMCase variant G339T (R61M) is associated with asthma protection in some populations. Here we showed that M at the position 61 is highly conserved in the many mammals other than orangutan and humans (fig. 5). In addition, introduction of M61R and M61I to WT mouseAMCase lead to a significant reduction of its chitinolytic activity (figs. 4 and
5). Taken together, our present and previous data by Seibold et al. (2009) indicate that G339T (R61M) in humans is associated with asthma protection in the fashion of gain of function.Since the allele frequency of G339T is 26% in African Americans (Seibold et al. 2009), G339T (R61M) is known to be a nsSNP found in the modern human populations (rs41282496). Recently, the genomes of Neandertals and Denisovans have been sequenced (Green et al. 2010; Meyer et al. 2012; Prufer et al. 2014). It will be interesting to determine whether they carry M61 and/or R61 in their AMCase genome.We were able to reactivate the humanAMCase by combining two relatively inactive isoforms present in humans. Resulting new variant, C/B (fig. 3), containing five amino acids conserved in mouse homologue, had high chitinolytic activity and pH profile comparable to the mouseAMCase (fig. 3
fig. 6, upper part). These data indicated that specific amino acids introduced to the enzyme can reduce its activity (particularly M61R and M61I substitutions are critical for the chitinolytic activity), whereas presence of amino acids conserved in active enzymes reactivate the human enzyme to the level of the mouse homologue. In addition, we determined specific amino acids by nsSNPs which are responsible for reducing chitinolytic activity of humanAMCase. The concept outlined here could be utilized for enhancement of the enzyme activity by minimal genetic manipulation, e.g., by genome-editing technologies, in the future (fig. 6, upper part).Elevated or reduced AMCase levels have been reported in numerous diseases such as asthma, allergic inflammation, ocular allergy, dry eye syndrome, stomach cancer, adenoid hypertrophy, conjunctivitis, neuromyelitis, gastritis, or nasal polyp formation (Zhu et al. 2004; Reese et al. 2007; Bucolo et al. 2008; Seibold et al. 2008; Cozzarini et al. 2009; Musumeci et al. 2009; Park et al. 2009; Bucolo et al. 2011; Correale and Fiol 2011; Heo et al. 2011; Nookaew et al. 2013). In addition, AMCase is an important downstream effector of interleukin-13 stimulation in Th2 helper cell-mediated immune responses to pathogens, parasites and ovalbumin (Zhu et al. 2004; Hartl et al. 2009). Although the chitinolytic activity of the humanAMCase was significantly lower than that of the mouseAMCase, our novel C/B variant containing five amino acids conserved in mouseAMCase had high chitinolytic activity and pH profile comparable to the mouseAMCase. Thus, our recombinant proteins could be useful for understanding pathophysiological roles of AMCase in humans. This research could potentially lead to development of AMCase-related therapies as well as for the treatment of specific human diseases resulting from low levels and/or activity of AMCase, e.g., by supplementation therapy.
Materials and Methods
RNA, AMCase cDNA Preparation, and E. coli Expression Vectors
We used human stomach total RNA from the Human Total RNA Master Panel II (Clontech Laboratories) and reverse transcribed the RNA into cDNA, as previously described (Ohno et al. 2012). Mature HumanAMCase was amplified from the human stomach cDNA by PCR using KOD Plus DNA polymerase (Toyobo) and oligonucleotide primers (Sigma-Aldrich Life Science Japan) anchored with the restriction sites for EcoRI and XhoI (supplementary data file S1, Supplementary Material online) as described previously (Kashimura et al. 2013). Amplified cDNA was digested with EcoRI and XhoI and cloned into the same sites of the pEZZ18/pre-Protein A-AMCase-V5-His (mouse version) (Kashimura et al. 2013). The entire nucleotide sequence of the resulting plasmid DNA (pEZZ18/humanAMCase variant/V5-His) was confirmed by sequencing (Eurofins Genomics). Our initial humanAMCase cDNA corresponds to variant C (see fig. 3 and supplementary fig. S3, Supplementary Material online).
Site-Directed Mutagenesis by Primer Extension
We constructed human variant A, B, and C/B as well as chimeric and mutant proteins essentially by the method of site-directed mutagenesis by primer extension (Reikofski and Tao 1992). Detailed methods are described in supplementary text and supplementary data file S1, Supplementary Material online.
Preparation of the Recombinant Human and Mouse AMCase Proteins Expressed in E. coli
Using the plasmid DNAs (the pEZZ18/pre-Protein A-AMCase-V5-His), we transformed E. coliBL21 (DE3) (Novagen) to express pre-Protein A-AMCase-V5-His proteins (figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). Transformed E. coliBL21 (DE3) strains were grown in 1 L LB medium containing 100 µg/mL ampicillin at 37 °C for 18 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5,000 x g for 20 min at 4 °C. The recombinant protein was prepared from the periplasmic fraction of E. coli and purified by IgG Sepharose chromatography as described previously (Kashimura et al. 2013). The protein-containing fractions were desalted using PD MidiTrap G-25 (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with the TS buffer [20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 150 mM NaCl and a protease inhibitor (Complete, Roche)]. We also produced Protein A-WT mouseAMCase-V5-His and Protein A-V5-His as described previously (Kashimura et al. 2013).
SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis and Western Blot
The obtained protein fractions were analyzed using standard SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), followed by Western blot using anti-V5-HRP monoclonal antibody (Invitrogen). The immunoblots were analyzed and quantified using the Luminescent Image Analyzer (ImageQuant LAS 4000, GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Chitinase Enzymatic Assays
Chitinase enzyme activity was determined with the fluorogenic substrate 4-MU β-D- N, N′-diacetylchitobioside hydrate (Sigma-Aldrich) as a substrate in McIlvaine’s buffer (0.1 M citric acid and 0.2 M Na2HPO4; pH 2.0 to pH 8.0) or 0.1 M Gly-HCl buffer (pH 1.0 to pH 3.0) at 37 °C for 30 min as described previously (Ohno et al. 2013). The fluorescence of released 4-MU was measured using spectrofluorophotometer RF-5300PC (Shimadzu) with excitation at 360 nm and emission at 450 nm. The amount of product (4-MU) was estimated using a standard curve based on 4-MU (Sigma-Aldrich).
Degradation of Colloidal Chitin by AMCase
Colloidal chitin was prepared from shrimp shell chitin (Sigma-Aldrich) as described previously and used as a substrate to determine the chitinase activity (Kashimura et al. 2013). All enzymatic reactions using colloidal chitin (at a final concentration of 1 mg/mL) as substrates were carried out in a volume of 50 μL containing E. coli-expressed proteins in McIlvaine’s buffer (pH 2.0). The reactions were incubated for 16 h at 37 °C. The chitin fragments generated from these reactions were labeled covalently at their reducing end groups with the fluorophore 8-aminonaphthalene-1,3,6-trisulphonic acid (ANTS, Invitrogen), and the resulting fluorescent derivatives were separated by high-resolution PAGE, as described by Jackson (1990) and quantified using the Luminescent Image Analyzer as described above. N-acetyl chitooligosaccharides (Seikagaku Corporation) were used as standards.
Phylogenetic Analysis
cDNA sequences of hominoidea AMCase were retrieved from the NCBI GenBank (supplementary data file S2, Supplementary Material online). A phylogenetic tree was constructed by the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) method with MEGA 7 (http://www.megasoftware.net) (Kumar et al. 2016). Bootstrap analyses were conducted with 1,000 replicates. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method (Tamura et al. 2004) and are expressed in units of the number of base substitutions per site.
Calculation of Substitution Rates
Rate ratios of nonsynonymous-to-synonymous substitutions dN/dS (ω) were calculated by PAMLX software, version 1.3.1 (Xu and Yang 2013). We employed a free-ratio model to allow the dN/dS ratios to vary for each branch.
Statistical Analyses
Data are shown as mean with standard deviation (SD). Chitinolytic activities were compared by Student’s t-test.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary figures S1–S3, tables S1–S5, text and data files S1 and S2 are available at Molecular Biology and Evolution online (http://www.mbe.oxfordjournals.org/).
Authors: Sibylle Bierbaum; Renate Nickel; Anja Koch; Susanne Lau; Klaus A Deichmann; Ulrich Wahn; Andrea Superti-Furga; Andrea Heinzmann Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2005-09-22 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Tiffany A Reese; Hong-Erh Liang; Andrew M Tager; Andrew D Luster; Nico Van Rooijen; David Voehringer; Richard M Locksley Journal: Nature Date: 2007-04-22 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Kay Prüfer; Fernando Racimo; Nick Patterson; Flora Jay; Sriram Sankararaman; Susanna Sawyer; Anja Heinze; Gabriel Renaud; Peter H Sudmant; Cesare de Filippo; Heng Li; Swapan Mallick; Michael Dannemann; Qiaomei Fu; Martin Kircher; Martin Kuhlwilm; Michael Lachmann; Matthias Meyer; Matthias Ongyerth; Michael Siebauer; Christoph Theunert; Arti Tandon; Priya Moorjani; Joseph Pickrell; James C Mullikin; Samuel H Vohr; Richard E Green; Ines Hellmann; Philip L F Johnson; Hélène Blanche; Howard Cann; Jacob O Kitzman; Jay Shendure; Evan E Eichler; Ed S Lein; Trygve E Bakken; Liubov V Golovanova; Vladimir B Doronichev; Michael V Shunkov; Anatoli P Derevianko; Bence Viola; Montgomery Slatkin; David Reich; Janet Kelso; Svante Pääbo Journal: Nature Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Steven J Van Dyken; Hong-Erh Liang; Ram P Naikawadi; Prescott G Woodruff; Paul J Wolters; David J Erle; Richard M Locksley Journal: Cell Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Phuwanat Sakornsakolpat; Dmitry Prokopenko; Brian D Hobbs; Michael H Cho; Maxime Lamontagne; Nicola F Reeve; Anna L Guyatt; Victoria E Jackson; Nick Shrine; Dandi Qiao; Traci M Bartz; Deog Kyeom Kim; Mi Kyeong Lee; Jeanne C Latourelle; Xingnan Li; Jarrett D Morrow; Ma'en Obeidat; Annah B Wyss; Per Bakke; R Graham Barr; Terri H Beaty; Steven A Belinsky; Guy G Brusselle; James D Crapo; Kim de Jong; Dawn L DeMeo; Tasha E Fingerlin; Sina A Gharib; Amund Gulsvik; Ian P Hall; John E Hokanson; Woo Jin Kim; David A Lomas; Stephanie J London; Deborah A Meyers; George T O'Connor; Stephen I Rennard; David A Schwartz; Pawel Sliwinski; David Sparrow; David P Strachan; Ruth Tal-Singer; Yohannes Tesfaigzi; Jørgen Vestbo; Judith M Vonk; Jae-Joon Yim; Xiaobo Zhou; Yohan Bossé; Ani Manichaikul; Lies Lahousse; Edwin K Silverman; H Marike Boezen; Louise V Wain; Martin D Tobin Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 38.330