Literature DB >> 12361172

Adaptive optics visual simulator.

Enrique J Fernández1, Silvestre Manzanera, Patricia Piers, Pablo Artal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a prototype instrument that uses adaptive optics to introduce virtually any desired aberration profile in a subject's eye. At the same time, the instrument could be used to evaluate the subject's spatial vision for each controlled aberration profile. This "aberration testing station" or "visual simulator" allows us to study the relationship between specific aberrations and visual quality.
METHODS: The apparatus uses infrared light to measure the wavefront aberration of the system plus the eye with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor. Defocus is added (or removed) with a computer-controlled, motorized optometer, while higher order aberrations are introduced by a 37-channel membrane deformable mirror. A parallel viewing channel is used for visual testing with the instrument. Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and other visual tests are performed under normal viewing for each desired aberration profile.
RESULTS: The range of defocus that can be added is nearly unlimited, while the maximum amount of other aberration modes is restricted to approximately 0.5 microm, depending on mode. Pure modes or any selected combination of modes can be produced with high repeatability and precision (usually better than 0.05 microm), and the system works for pupil diameters up to 6 mm (with a natural pupil).
CONCLUSIONS: The adaptive optics visual simulator is a powerful, non-invasive tool to evaluate how aberrations affect vision. In addition, it can be used for the interactive design and testing of new ophthalmic devices, and for the simulation of visual outcomes in customized refractive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12361172     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20020901-27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  10 in total

Review 1.  Applications of augmented reality in ophthalmology [Invited].

Authors:  Güneş Aydındoğan; Koray Kavaklı; Afsun Şahin; Pablo Artal; Hakan Ürey
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 2.  Adaptive optics for studying visual function: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Austin Roorda
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Vision science and adaptive optics, the state of the field.

Authors:  Susana Marcos; John S Werner; Stephen A Burns; William H Merigan; Pablo Artal; David A Atchison; Karen M Hampson; Richard Legras; Linda Lundstrom; Geungyoung Yoon; Joseph Carroll; Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; Adam M Dubis; Alfredo Dubra; Ann Elsner; Ravi Jonnal; Donald T Miller; Michel Paques; Hannah E Smithson; Laura K Young; Yuhua Zhang; Melanie Campbell; Jennifer Hunter; Andrew Metha; Grazyna Palczewska; Jesse Schallek; Lawrence C Sincich
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Minimum change in spherical aberration that can be perceived.

Authors:  Silvestre Manzanera; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Optimization of the Light Sword Lens for Presbyopia Correction.

Authors:  Walter Torres-Sepúlveda; Alejandro Mira-Agudelo; John Fredy Barrera-Ramírez; Krzysztof Petelczyc; Andrzej Kolodziejczyk
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  A global approach to describe retinal defocus patterns.

Authors:  Miguel García García; Dibyendu Pusti; Siegfried Wahl; Arne Ohlendorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  2-D Peripheral image quality metrics with different types of multifocal contact lenses.

Authors:  Miguel García García; Siegfried Wahl; Dibyendu Pusti; Pablo Artal; Arne Ohlendorf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comparison between optical and digital blur using near visual acuity.

Authors:  David Kordek; Laura K Young; Jan Kremláček
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Impact on stereo-acuity of two presbyopia correction approaches: monovision and small aperture inlay.

Authors:  Enrique J Fernández; Christina Schwarz; Pedro M Prieto; Silvestre Manzanera; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Assessment of subjective refraction with a clinical adaptive optics visual simulator.

Authors:  Lucía Hervella; Eloy A Villegas; Pedro M Prieto; Pablo Artal
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.351

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.